Slashdot Log In
Home-made Helicopters in Nigeria
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Mon Oct 22, 2007 09:39 AM
from the financed-entirely-by-dead-princes dept.
from the financed-entirely-by-dead-princes dept.
W33dz writes "A 24-year-old undergraduate from Nigeria is building helicopters out of old car and bike parts. Mubarak Muhammed Abdullahi, a physics student, spent eight months building the yellow model seen on yahoo or on Gizmodo using the money he makes from repairing cell phones and computers. While some of the parts have been sourced from a crashed 747, the chopper contains all sorts of surprises."
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Home-made Helicopters in Nigeria
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 319 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Ay AY yay caramba! (Score:5, Informative)
Certain absolutely mandatory items, like X-ray and ultrasonic parts inspections, are not practical for the home builder and are likely to lead to a very short trip.
Re:Ay AY yay caramba! (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://thepeckfamily.us/ | Last Journal: Thursday November 08, @11:19AM)
Re:Ay AY yay caramba! (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.christopherculver.com/)
Re:Ay AY yay caramba! (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday October 15, @11:53PM)
I don't recall the Wright Brothers' first plane weighing half a ton, and being powered by a 133HP engine...
Experimenting with powerful engines, allowing for heavy construction, means that any small mistake is going to be much, much more disasterous than it would have been in the old days.
Re:Ay AY yay caramba! (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not sure that ligher weight has anything to do with safety though. I can take my 385 pound motorcycle and hit a cement wall at 150MPH after all. I can take a 12HP scooter and hit the same wall at 60-70MPH too.
Generally you weaken a structure when reducing weight. I'd immagine this helicopter is probaby more sturdy than the Flyer I.
Keep in mind you can learn more about planes, trains and automobiles (and helicopters) in a 15 minute internet search than the entire world knew in 1903. I bet the second-hand civic engine is more reliable than the flyer I's one-off custom hand built (in a mere 6 weeks) engine.
Kudos to the kid. He's done what the vast majority of
Re:Ay AY yay caramba! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Ay AY yay caramba! (Score:4, Informative)
(Last Journal: Monday October 15, @11:53PM)
Helicopters don't fly in a vacuum.
Re:Ay AY yay caramba! (Score:5, Funny)
The sheer amount of... (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.nova.edu/~jonaadam)
Re:The sheer amount of... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Ay AY yay caramba! (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.last.fm/user/schmod)
Re: D&D Trap worthy of Tomb of Horrors (Score:5, Insightful)
Crashing Home-made Helicopter: CR 10; mechanical; location trigger; no reset; Atk +16 melee (8D6+8, bludgeoning); burning fuel (equivalent to an incendiary cloud spell, 15th-level wizard, 4D6/round for 15 rounds, DC 22 Reflex save half damage); Search DC 20; Disable Device DC 25. Market Price: unknown (unique).
Re:Ay AY yay caramba! (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://kamthaka.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday March 30 2005, @03:18PM)
So, think of your building your own helicopter vs. buying one from somebody in the business. For simplicity's sake, let's say that if you pay yourself a reasonable amount for your time, the cost comes out even. In your homemade helicopter, you have a death risk of 1% per thousand hours of flight. In a "real" helicopter, let's say your risk was 0.001% per thousand hours.
If you go ahead and build your home helicopter, you have just spent 0.999%/hr of "opportunity risk" for the thrill of flying in your own invention.
I can't tell you whether that's a good "investment" or not. Maybe the thrill means a lot more to you than it does to me. Maybe you were on the fence about committing suicide, so the risk doesn't really mean much other than an end to unbearable indecision. It's up to you to make the calculation. I can say this though: if the thrill of flying your own invention has no value to you, you're a fool to try it.
On the other hand, the marginal risk calculation may be utterly meaningless to this guy. If having access to his own helicopter is for practical purposes an impossible dream, it makes no sense to upbraid him for not choosing that instead. His calculation is only based on having his own aircraft versus not having his own aircraft.
Even if it weren't, the project may have utility for him that we can't even imagine. Maybe he'll be the Igor Sikorsky of Africa. Goodness knows small scale aviation innovation is glacially slow in the US because of safety concerns. The cost of Africa developing indigenous technology would seem appalling, but it's up to them to determine if it is worth it.
Sour grapes? (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://cafepress.com/phototravel?pid=5934485)
According to the article — which we all read, did not we — the contraption is built in part from the pieces of a 747, which crashed nearby some years ago.
This points at two things at once
That said, I'm afraid, the regulations/inspections you consider "essential" are not really such — I sense the "sour grapes" sentiment. Sure, it is far riskier to fly in this guy's machine than in a factory-built helicopter. But the fact, that it flies at all — and that he is still a student, who works on the copter in between studying and repairing other people's electronics to supplement his income — are rather remarkable. If a 24-year old in the dirt-poor Nigeria can do this, where is my flying car in the US?
hummm.. (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.gemstate.net/friends | Last Journal: Tuesday September 11, @10:32AM)
No pitch control (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Indeed (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.gemstate.net/friends | Last Journal: Tuesday September 11, @10:32AM)
In a helicopter seven feet is enough to kill you. Heck you can kill yourself on the ground with just a little bad luck. All it would take is for the transmission to let go and have a 133 HP chain whip through the cabin. Helicopters are complex beasts.
Re:Indeed (Score:4, Informative)
(Last Journal: Wednesday October 05 2005, @10:39AM)
Here's what the FAA requires:
A - Airspeed indicator.
B - Altimeter.
C - Magnetic direction indicator. (read: compass.)
D - Tachometer.
E - Oil pressure gauge.
F - Oil temperature gauge for each air-cooled engine.
G - Fuel gauge indicating the quantity of fuel in each tank.
H - For small civil airplanes certificated after 1996, an approved aviation red or aviation white anticollision light system.
I - An approved safety belt with an approved metal-to-metal latching device for each occupant 2 years of age or older.
J - For small civil airplanes manufactured after 1978, an approved shoulder harness for each front seat. (other req'mts R.S. 1986)
K - An emergency locator transmitter, (excepts - sing. place ++)
Now, if you're flying an ultralight -- under 250 pounds -- you can do any fool thing you want, but in the US, if you have an airplane with an airworthiness certificate, you have to take along some stuff.
(The above list from an Experimental Aviation website quiz [eaa1267.org].)
Would you buy one? (Score:5, Funny)
I think I'll keep saving for my skycar [moller.com]
I WANT ONE! (Score:1)
Helicopter or Hovercraft? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.mainecoon.plus.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday January 17 2007, @11:05AM)
or until it encounters a tree, telegraph pole, house, giraffe....
Excellent! (Score:1)
Seriously good luck to him, the guy has talent, but I wouldnt ride it..
Unusable Prototype But a Promising Individual (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/~eldavojohn/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 16, @03:26PM)
"No one from the NCAA has come to see what I've done. We don't reward talent in this country," he lamented.
Nigeria would pay a premium to start up a helicopter plant or to start R&D but since the resources are not readily available and there's already another country selling the choppers, this man will most likely partake in the brain drain and go somewhere where his knowledge and resourcefulness are recognized and rewarded.
The government should either change its ways or just deal with being known only for e-mail scams and human suffering from inept governance. That's the problem with inept governance though, it usually persists by definition.
Re:Unusable Prototype But a Promising Individual (Score:4, Interesting)
I'll admit it's amazing that he managed to build it. I'll admit that he has big dreams. I'm not yet willing to admit he's capable of making a safe helicopter, and I bet they aren't either.
If he really -can- do it, he should be looking for investors, not buyers. He's never going to manage a proper, safe helicopter without a lot more money than he put into his current one. And he's never going to get a buyer until he has a prototype.
It's like saying, "I've got a small garden at my house. Why won't they pay me to grow cabbage for the whole country?"
Re:Unusable Prototype But a Promising Individual (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.gemstate.net/friends | Last Journal: Tuesday September 11, @10:32AM)
After he goes to college then maybe building helicopters in country could be an option.
Or crop dusters?
Or UAVs?
Or maybe even just a shop to do helicopter maintenance in country?
The man seems to have lots of raw talent. Now he needs education and opportunity.
Re:Unusable Prototype But a Promising Individual (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Unusable Prototype But a Promising Individual (Score:4, Interesting)
http://www.wired.com/gadgets/miscellaneous/news/2007/09/paraglider/ [wired.com]
picture here...
http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/multimedia/2007/09/gallery_paraglider?slide=1&slideView=2/ [wired.com]
With what money? (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday June 21 2004, @04:25PM)
1. you _must_ use that money to buy from the country that gave you the money. Often they'll even tell you what, and from exactly what company.
For example, let's say Nigeria wants to build a dam. (Or anything else, including helicopters.) The sane way would be to pay some local construction company to build it. After all, they work cheaper, you inject some money in the local economy, and might even stimulate some specialists to stay in your county instead of skipping over the border at the first oportunity. But you won't get a loan, much less foreign aid, for that. Unless you can prove that you're so solvable that you didn't even need a loan at all, except for some uncontrollable desire to pay interest.
The loans you can get come with strings attached like "but you'll contract the building from this American corporation." Sometimes you don't even actually see the money. They're transferred from an USA bank account to another USA bank account, and that's that. Of course, it only costs a few times more than letting the locals do it, and helps ruin yet another local industry, but such is being on the shit end of the imperialism stick.
And if you think that dam building is something you can do without, picture the same deal on grain, trucks, and other such. Essentially there's a _shitload_ of loans and foreign aid that isn't what you think it is. It's tied to destroying your local agriculture and industry.
2. you _must_ implement some good ol' right-wing reforms. Cut government spending, let companies go bankrupt, cut down social security, raise interest rates, etc.
Sounds like good, common sense advice, right?
Well, the problem with common sense is that it isn't that common and often makes no sense. In this case, according to modern Keynesian economics, those are the exact measures that will transform a recession into a depression, or a depression into a crash. That's stuff you do in an economic boom, not during times of crisis. It's counter-intuitive, but modern economics tend to be that way.
Essentially we, the West, have been asking the third world countries to destroy their own economy, ever since WW2. Welcome to the wonderful world of imperialism. They're supposed to be busy sewing cheap sports shoes and mining cheap iron for us, not to start industrializing.
And as a third world government, you'll be nailed to a cross whether you take it or not. Your choices there are (A) refuse and get to explain to a whole country why they'll have less bread or more brownouts this year, and that in the long term it's better for them, or (B) take it even if you know that in the long term you're only harming your country. Damned if you do, damned if you don't, and someone will blame you for either choice.
Oh, and if you chose A, congrats, now you've got all the first world treating you like the great Satan too, for refusing to play their game. Some economic sanctions might be in your future, to destroy you that way. On the other hand, choice B at least makes you look good in the short term and often comes together with some bribe.
It's easy to blame it on inept governments or kleptokracy, but that's really the only choices they typically have there. It's a lose-lose choice. But option B at least doesn't cause massive unrest and a bunch of other problems.
It's easy to look at it and say that they took choice B only because they're fucking stupid or because of the bribe. And I guess it some cases it even is so. But in a lot of cases I genuinely wonder if it's that simple.
Would be interesting to see how it "flies" (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Wednesday October 31, @08:33AM)
Sure I am glad there is atleast one Nigerian working with his hands and brain instead of sening emails about 18 million dollars in a slush fund left over from the coffers of General Abacha.
DEAR SIR (Score:5, Funny)
(hey it's caps-lock day today anyway)
Good for him. (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.gcsquared.com/)
I wish him better luck than the X-Wing (Score:2)
BS (Score:5, Informative)
(http://blog.lynxworks.eu/)
I would love to see more photos of this but suspect we wont. His description of the controls doesn't really fit with how rotary wing aircraft operate and there are other reservations.
133 horsepower is very underpowered considering the smallest I work with is the Gazelle with 858shp and the quoted 300 rpm on blades that size is very low to give any kind of lift, in fact it is ridiculous. Car engines are relatively heavy and looking at the welded head and the car seats, I cannot imagine this has the capability to lift off with a person on board.
Looking at the photo, it also appears not to have a swash plate or similar mechanism, so how the rotor disc is positioned to give directional flight I have no idea. On the plus side he does have a big red navigation light on top. Never mind that it's not on the port side as it's supposed to be.
Gazelle != good example (Score:4, Informative)
Obviously you don't need over 800hp to get a helicopter to work. Granted, I'm sure his aircraft weighs a great deal more than an R22.
heh. (Score:4, Interesting)
(I'm informed by a pilot colleague that without squash plates and cyclic controls - whatever the hell they are - its not a true helicopter and hence is uncontrollable. Still we all agreed it was better then we could do.)
Whoever measured the 'copter... (Score:2, Interesting)
Neat... (Score:2, Insightful)
Something like that would actually be handy for travelling in many parts of the world where the roads are poor and access is difficult - cheap helicopters would be great for getting around and getting access.
Imagine using these in the aftermath of natural disasters when the roads are washed out and areas are inaccessible in places like the Honduras or New Orleans. In America, we can't/don't build cheap aircraft like this. Heck, an auto mechanic could probably do most of the maintenance on the thing...
Re:Neat... (Score:4, Insightful)
Cheap and small is all well and good, but when you want complex tech to be reliable, the "cheap" goes away real quick. Especially when you're trusting lives to that tech.
stealthy! (Score:1)
(http://www.usflowerhaus.com/)
Why shouldn't they buy? (Score:2)
1. Built from random car parts. Parts from broken cars, obviously quality material to start with. Better make sure your junk yard is properly stocked with old buicks.
2. Maximum altitude is 15 feet. But if anything goes wrong, you can just jump to the ground.
3. Carrying capacity. If it can lift one person 15 feet, how high can it lift with 1 ton of cargo?
4. Besides the maker, who are you going to convince to trust their life to this?
Good effort, lots of kits for homebuilding (Score:1, Informative)
I was just recently at "Rotorfest" at the helicopter museum in Pennsylvania. There were a few small homemade helicopters on display. There are also more small home-built kiy helicopters available than I realized. An Air Command kit, Benson Sport kit, the Robinson, the Rotorway Scorpion kit...
Some nice kits, as well as the big well-known helicopters, shown here:
http://www.helicoptermuseum.org/Aircraft.asp [helicoptermuseum.org]
Shades of B.A. Barracus (Score:3, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/)
It's easier to crash one too.
Send this kid to the US and offer him a job.... (Score:1)
Well done! (Score:3, Insightful)
Give that Kid a Visa!! (Score:2)
all sorts of surprises. (Score:1)
How long is it going to be before he uses parts from a "crashed helicopters [made] out of old car and bike parts." ? That would be all sorts of surprises.
Someone should point him at hovercraft (Score:2)
(http://www.conversal.co.uk/)
ah huh! (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Thursday April 06 2006, @09:11AM)
Ninjas (Score:1)
I read that title as "Home-made Helicopters with Ninjas"
--Q
Dear beneficiary (Score:2)
(http://www.gargoyleslanding.com/)
Yours in Service,
BARRISTER CHRIS WALLACE.
(Head of Chambers.)
some language translation for you: (Score:4, Funny)
(http://circletimessquare.com/)
Quick! Somebody give that kid a VISA and... (Score:2)
(http://www.opengeek.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday July 07, @02:25PM)
Nice talent and even better, motivation.
If Nigeria doesn't appreciate him, somebody else will.
Media hype? (Score:2)
(http://technical-writing.dionysius.com/ | Last Journal: Monday November 05, @03:35PM)
Sikorsky (Score:5, Insightful)
"You can't make a helicopter without ultrasonic and x-ray fracture inspection."
Well sure that makes it safer, but Sikorskiy didn't have any of that. Hell, I don't think they did that in the Vietnam era.
"You need 900 horsepower (or some damn thing) to make a working heli."
Sikorskiy's first helicopter ran on a 90-hp piston engine, with a welded steel frame.
It's true that this guy's helicopter is probably overweight, flying on ground-effect only, and it seems to be missing the most important (and complicated) part, the swashplate / cyclic blade control. But give him the resources Sikorkiy had, and I think he could do it.
A real GEM (Score:3, Informative)
(http://www.ajwm.net/amayer/)
Mind, I'll give the guy props for effort and ingenuity, and if he gets the 15 foot altitude version working that would be kind of fun to skim around in over open enough terrain. But an actual helicopter that can fly out of ground effect is a bit more of a challenge. (Me, I've lusted after Rotorway's homebuilt kits since their original Scorpion [rotorway.com] days.)
well... couldn't they wait for.. (Score:1)
Telling typo in TFA (Score:2)
A quick search for "RMP" comes up with "Risk Management Plan," something that will no doubt come in handy in any homemade helicopter.
The Real Story... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://samwyse.suprglu.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday December 06 2006, @11:22PM)
First, I must solicit your strictest confidence in this transaction. This is by virtue of its nature as being utterly confidential and 'top secret'. I am sure and have confidence of your ability and reliability to prosecute a transaction of this great magnitude involving a pending transaction requiring maximum confidence.
I am a physics undergraduate in northern Nigeria who is interested in production of helicopters with funds which are presently trapped in Nigeria. In order to commence this business we solicit your assistance to enable us to transfer into your account the said trapped funds.
The source of this fund is as follows; during the last military regime here in Nigeria, the government officials set up aircraft companies and awarded themselves contracts which were grossly over-invoiced in various ministries. The present civilian government set up a contract review panel and we have identified a lot of inflated military contract funds which are presently floating in the central bank of Nigeria ready for payment.
However, by virtue of my position as a physics undergraduate, I cannot acquire this money in my name. I have therefore, been delegated as a matter of trust by my colleagues of the university to look for an overseas partner into whose account we would transfer the sum of US$21,320,000.00 (twenty one million, three hundred and twenty thousand US dollars). Hence we are writing you this letter. We have agreed to share the money thus; 1. 20% for the account owner 2. 70% for us (the students) 3. 10% to be used in settling taxation and all local and foreign expenses. It is from the 70% that we wish to commence the helicopter manufacturing business.
Please, note that this transaction is 100% safe and we hope to commence the transfer latest seven (7) banking days from the date of the receipt of the following information by telephone/fax; 234-1-7740449, your signed and stamped letterhead paper. The above information will enable us write letters of claim and job description respectively. This way we will use your name to apply for payment and re-award the contract in your name.
We are looking forward to doing this business with you and solicit your confidentiality in this transaction. Please acknowledge the receipt of this letter using the above telephone/fax numbers. I will send you detailed information of this pending project when I have heard from you.
Yours faithfully,
Dr Mubarak Muhammad Abdullahi
First steps of many. (Score:1)
Snarky reply (Score:2)
That said, cool idea to build your own copter...
Stanley Hiller did it.. (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.hiller.org/in_memory.shtml/ [hiller.org]
Although UC Berkeley had little chance to influence young Stanley because he dropped out to build his business at the end of his freshman year, the university did yield the love of his life, Carolyn Balsdon, whom he married when they were both 22.
By 1944, Stanley Hiller, Jr., completed the first successful flight of a helicopter in the western United States. He flew his yellow fabric-covered contraption himself, although he had never flown a helicopter nor seen one fly. After at least one mishap, in August of that year a successful demonstration was made at San Francisco's Marina Green, where a plaque today commemorates the historic event. The flight propelled the young inventor-who had no engineering degrees and, in fact, never finished college-into international headlines. He became the youngest person ever to receive the coveted Fawcett Aviation Award for major contributions to the advancement of aviation. Eventually, the little co-axial XH-44 "Hiller-Copter" would earn a permanent place in Smithsonian Institution.
try it in the usa (Score:1)
For those of you that want to build and fly (Score:2)
(http://www.danslagle.com/)
For those of you that want to learn to build and fly a RC Helicopter check out HeliFreak.com [helifreak.com]. Heck, they have helicopter build videos from box to flight you can download for FREE! Building a model is not as exciting but it has got to be a 100 times safer ;)
6 Buttons (Score:2)
"The cockpit consists of a push-button ignition, an accelerator lever between the seats which controls vertical thrust, a joystick that provides balance and bearing.
A small screen on the dashboard connects to a camera underneath the helicopter for ground vision, a set of six buttons adjusts the screen's brightness while a small transmitter is used for communication."
Let's see
Button 1: Brighter
Button 2: Darker
Buttons 3 through 6: ???
Moller needs to move to Nigeria? (Score:2)
(http://www.scarydevil.com/~peter/ | Last Journal: Monday September 26 2005, @06:53PM)
He's a biggen... (Score:1)
(http://www.southurst.id.au/)
Looking at the image on the article, that makes him about 6 metres tall and probably a metre or two wide. I think we can assume that none of those measurements are correct...
Or maybe it's 7 metres tall when the rotor breaks and folds upwards...
and.. (Score:1)
Don't worry about autorotating (Score:2)
Re:Ballmer says helicopter violates Microsoft IP (Score:2)
Re:Come on dude... whiner (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Friday November 09, @01:36AM)
The flight lasted 12 seconds and covered 120 feet. [eyewitnesstohistory.com]
Patience, Grasshopper
re: -1 redundant (Score:2)
(http://home.swbell.net/kingtj | Last Journal: Saturday September 30 2006, @01:07PM)
Life, at the speed of Slashdot, I guess....