Slashdot Log In
New iPod Checksum Cracked, Linux Supported
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:08 AM
from the well-that-didn't-take-long dept.
from the well-that-didn't-take-long dept.
An anonymous reader writes "After 36 hours of reverse engineering, the method for producing the checksum on new iPods has been discovered." You can also get linux support working if that's what you crave for your shiny new toy.
Related Stories
Firehose:New iPod Checksum Cracked by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
What's the draw? (Score:5, Insightful)
What makes Apple's offering any better than anyone else's?
I don't get it at all.
What I don't get more than that is the people who buy the iPod just to put Linux on it. That actually causes negative understanding.
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Insightful)
Same thing with linux. It's not linux, it's you! You're the problem!
No, guys. Things should be usable in a natural state. You should be comfortable with something as soon as you start using it. If you're not, then the products usability has failed you. If someone thinks the scrollwheel is better, that's a perfectly valid opinion. You can't tell them their opinion is wrong because YOUR mp3 player works just by holding down a button instead of the scroll wheel. Guess what... that's not natural to this person.
And no, I don't own an ipod. Yes, I've tried linux. No, I don't use a mac. I'm just a usability guy who builds websites.
And sorry if this seems like a rant.
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Insightful)
Integration with iTunes (not necessarily the store), such as syncing Smart Playlists, and 3rd-party accessory support that's an order of magnitude greater than for any other music player.
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Insightful)
It also comes pre-installed on all Macs, so there's that going for it.
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Insightful)
There are some other reasons too. First of all, take iTunes. iTunes may not a real windows-like interface, and some apparently consider the Windows version to be bloated, but it does organize music well, and is easy enough to teach to people who are not computer literate. Some other players have good software, but others have software that is terrible.
iPod is easy to use. There is no denying that the scroll wheel interface is highly intuitive, and accessing features is fairly easy. Some other player do have interfaces that are just as good.
The iPod does not have feature bloat. Many other mp3 players have many extra features, but most of the times those features are very poorly implemented, and has the effect of just wasting menu space. These poorly implemented features also tend to drag the perception of the whole player down.
The headphones. For low to low mid-end earbuds, the ones that come with the iPod are some of the best. Of course, many headphones, or high-end earbuds are better.
The iPod has many accessories. It is one of the few players to support near full integration with some car head units (receivers).
It's name. Tell somebody you want an "iPod Nano" and they will be able to remember the name. There is no part of the name that looks like "z647", which people are quite likely to forget. Even if you wanted to specify the capacity it is still easier to remember. Many of the generations have distinct names like iPod Color, and iPod Video, which are easy to remember.
It has Apple's reputation for ease of use and reliability behind it. Most of the other closest competitors are marketed under brands with well known poor models, which can really hurt
The simple fact is that while many players are as good or better in some of those categories, they are lacking in one or more of the others. The combination of these atributes is why the iPod is the leading mp3 player.
Just a side note: people who are mentioning gap-less playback, please realize that many people have no such albums, and have no interest in this feature, so it should not be surprising that apple waited for so long before implementing.
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Insightful)
When shopping for an MP3 player, I considered alternatives (and in fact looked at alternatives first), and in the end went with iPod because:
1) Most of the alternatives I looked at weren't any cheaper than the iPod
2) Most of them got slammed in reviews for bad user interfaces
3) Most of them were not available in B&M stores allowing me to return it easily if I hated the UI.
In short, in the end the iPod wound up being the "safe bet", and unlike most Apple products, wasn't grossly overpriced compared to the competition. (Disclaimer: This was over a year ago, things may have changed since then.)
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Informative)
That's huge. You can get iPod interfaces for most higher-end car stereos for example, not to mention the plethora of docks, cases, etc.
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Insightful)
I also suggest that once this has occurred, the discussion should cease (much like a Godwin). My hope is that such a rule would put an end to the pointless arguments over the device. People buy the iPod because they like it, and they pay for it themselves; why is this a problem?
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Funny)
Hey! It's a problem because we are the experts, ok? People should ask us what to buy. And we'll suggest some sort of unheard-of niche device, because that's why you asked an expert. Do you need an expert to suggest the most popular device? No. Do you need an expert to configure something that's easy to use? No. We're important. Don't you know that? We know better. We can't look down on the ignorant masses when we acknowledge they made the right choice. So they didn't, no matter how happy they are.
I can't believe you even asked.
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Informative)
I can take an iPod plug it into a connector in my car and completely control it from my steering wheel and see the info on the stereo's display. works perfectly. I can do the same with my Crestron Whole house audio system, my alarm clock, etc...
No other mp3 player on the market can do that. NONE. Apple opened up the connector interface and had a rs232 control interface down in that connector so other devices can control it, All other mp3 makers sit in the corner curled up screaming "MINE MINE!" or are not smart enough to think about 3rd party control like that.
That is why I use it, my daughter uses it, and I reccomend the iPod to all my clients what are doing whole house automation and audio integration. Only the ipod can do advanced integration that is seamless from the car to the home to the bedroom. (even the wife if you buy a iGazim attachment)
That is why.
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Informative)
Linux support is so obvious for 99 out of 100 usb mp3 player out there it is not even worth mentioning. These mp3 players just behave like a generic USB pen disk. That you need a special (circumvention?) program for a iPod is the strange issue here.
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:What's the draw? (Score:5, Funny)
If you want to use it in a way it's not designed to be used, then don't be surprised if it doesn't "work out of the box" for that.
My efforts to use my iPod as a waffle-iron have met with little success so far.
Good because linux support is better (Score:5, Interesting)
I hate poorly named mp3s, gtkpod can get my entire ipod properly organized in a matter of minutes because of the nifty variety of views.
Unimpressive (Score:5, Funny)
A integrity checksum or a crypto checksum? (Score:5, Insightful)
A user can unplug a device at any time, even in the middle of a catalog write. It only seems prudent to checksum the data to make sure you don't have a corrupt file.
I'd be interested to hear if this is a tricky crypto algorithm, or the sort of simple MD5 or CRC of data that a programmer would whip out for integrity. This is important because if the intent was integrity we can expect it to not change. The problem is solved. If it was intended to detect reverse engineered and possibly incorrect files then we can look forward to more algorithms in the future.
TFA was silent on the matter. <wtbw> can i hear a fuck yeah? didn't really tell me much.
Re:A integrity checksum or a crypto checksum? (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, yeah, but why would you want to actively disable access to the parts of the music library that aren't corrupt simply because some of it might be? It's not as if the iPod will explode (or become more corrupt) because of a bad read.
I'm having a hard time understanding the justification for this change, both the "It's just to prevent corruption" explanation, and the "It's a conspiracy by Apple against GNOME users" one. In the absence of anything concrete from Apple, it seems all we can do is speculate.
Maybe it's for a faster sync (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:It makes me wonder (Score:5, Insightful)
Apple rarely fights hard when it comes to hacking of their products. Often any "fix" they give out is easily removed by people in such a way that it is obvious Apple wasn't even trying.
You have little far to look at the "please dont pirate this software" code in OS X intel.
Re:usable? (Score:5, Informative)
Although it would be interesting to have an open-source iPod OS...
Re:usable? (Score:5, Informative)