Slashdot Log In
DARPA to Raise Robot LANdroid Army
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:15 AM
from the hey-baby-wanna-destroy-all-humans dept.
from the hey-baby-wanna-destroy-all-humans dept.
Banekartr writes "The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency plans to develop a fleet of robots that soldiers can deploy in urban combat settings as they move through houses and along streets.
The program, dubbed LANdroid, envisions miniature autonomous drones that can form a network capable of relaying radio traffic in a setting often considered challenging for communications equipment.
According to a notional image of a LANdroid included in a DARPA pamphlet, each robot will be about the size of a deck of cards, and must be rugged, lightweight and able to operate for seven to 14 days, the agency said.
Demand for technologies to improve the military's ability to fight in urban settings has increased in recent years because many of the operations in Iraq take place in Baghdad and other Iraqi metropolitan settings.
DARPA officials will provide additional information about the program during a July 6 industry day."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Not very covert .... (Score:2)
Really, how difficult will it to put a bounty out for kids to go about smashing such things with rocks or something? Unless they can stay undetected they're gonna be prime targets for rem
Re: (Score:2)
I jus
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Hopefully that's true. But, I don't get the impression that when there's a running firefight in urban p
Re: (Score:2)
Ew. Robotic cockroaches. Armed. Hundreds of them.
Better hope that IFF thingy works.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Please no (Score:3, Funny)
Seriously, the little guy running with a rifle icon, that has to be from some grade school art contest. No one could possibly think those are functional informational graphics intended for grown ups.
And the green clouds?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's from a clip-art collection. I swear to god I've seen it before.
I think the "green cloud" is intentional -- if you look at it, it's not just a cloud,
LANdriod? (Score:3, Funny)
And anyway, I thought that Lucas had a copyright on anything 'droid.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Simpsons (Score:2)
I can't wait (Score:3, Interesting)
As long as I could turn them off at night that is.
Not as good for the soldiers as advertised (Score:2)
To Serve Man (Score:2)
They'll probably need to recharge their batteries rather than dedicate a lot of space to bigger ones.
When the Pentagon sends out little robots that feed on "battlefield casualty" bodies, we're all doomed.
Re:To Serve Man (Score:5, Interesting)
At your service. I saw the bat-signal and came a'running.
It would be nice, but I doubt it. RTGs are still incredibly expensive and wouldn't be used on something throw-away like this. In fact, the military as a whole tends to shy away from nuclear technology unless it's a bomb. The only reason why NASA still uses RTGs in the face of public protests is because nothing else will work. (Spacecraft live and die by the power available to them. Nuclear is not just an option, it's a requirement for extended space travel. People are going to need to accept that if we ever want to push out into space.)
More likely the military will look into using fuel cells or microgenerators to power these little buggers. For about the same space as it would cost to pack a couple of LIon batteries, the engineers could stick an alcohol fuel tank & (power cell | micro-gas turbine) with many time the energy density. That would allow the robots to meet or exceed the 7-14 day life expectancy.
Here's an example of just such a fuel cell: http://www.gizmag.com/go/5325/ [gizmag.com]
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
just abandon them in place afterwards.
That may not be a good idea, since enemy forces could just then grab the abandoned droids, and use them to listen in or jam our communications. A better idea would be a self-destruct mechanism of some kind, to prev
Must... resist... urge.... (Score:2, Funny)
hmm .. us gov plus robots (Score:2)
But if it saves hum
WiFi Repeater With Wheels? (Score:4, Insightful)
Leave the drive unit and motor control out, double the battery life, halve the weight and price, drop twice as many. Then design a separate device to do whatever they hell those tracks are on there for (giving the brass stiffies, is my guess).
JM2C, but this looks like a tits-on-a-mule cockup between war scientists and dipshit generals. "That looks good. Can you put wheels on it?" "Wheels, Sir?" "Yeah, wheels, so it can drive around, like that Grand Challenge thing you did. And the Predator. Autonomous warfighting robots, it's the future, son." "Umm, well, I guess it's possible." "Outstanding! Let me know when it's ready."
Not that I don't dig the shit out of DARPA, and I definitely want an autonomoous WiFi tank of my own, but this seems a little stupid.
Re:WiFi Repeater With Wheels? (Score:5, Interesting)
Seems like, if you had enough money to spend on the design, you could make a wifi (or similar UHF/microwave) repeater that was really tiny. Use custom ASICs, and I bet you could get something that was less than an inch in diameter and a few inches long, including batteries. Harden them appropriately, and you could drop them from planes over a target area, and even if you took substantial losses, would still have a functioning mesh network on the ground.
What you really want isn't a miniature tank with a Wifi AP strapped to it, what you want is an overgrown self-powered RFID tag with transmit/receive and basic routing capabilities.
I for one ::tab:: (Score:2)
incidentally how does one include strings in gt/lt brackets without the
I for one... (Score:4, Funny)
I predict (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:urban pacification .. (Score:4, Funny)