Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Upside Down Phone Patent

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:59 AM
from the upsidedowntalkin dept.
An anonymous reader noted that "A patent has been filed for the "Upside Down Phone", which features the keypad on top and the screen on the bottom. The idea behind the upside down phone is, apparently, to allow faster texting by have a more comfortable position for the thumb to work from. A quick check of this seems to confirm the theory, making this one of those "Why didn't I think of that?" moments."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Upside Down Phone Patent 25 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • "Why didn't I think of that?" (Score:5, Interesting)

    by alexhard (778254) <alexhard@@@gmail...com> on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:01AM (#17920702) Homepage
    I don't know..maybe because the hands will be right on top of the screen and you won't be able to see anything?
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      not if you hold it right.

      I had a job during the summer where I had to do a lot of data entry into phones and I ended up holding the thing upside-down and using it that way because it was easier.

      Of course, this was all on a bicycle, so that makes a differen
      • cool (Score:5, Funny)

        by White Yeti (927387) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @02:51PM (#17924050) Homepage Journal

        Of course, this was all on a bicycle, so that makes a difference as well.
        We need more posts that end with this line.
        [ Parent ]
      • by ozbird (127571) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @03:53PM (#17924904)
        I had a job during the summer where I had to do a lot of data entry into phones ... this was all on a bicycle, so that makes a difference as well.

        I find your ideas fascinating, and I would like to subscrib*CRASH*.
        [ Parent ]
    • Re:"Why didn't I think of that?" (Score:5, Informative)

      by fang2415 (987165) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @01:54PM (#17923216) Journal

      One of us *did* think of that. [slashdot.org]

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Really? Not for me. (Score:4, Informative)

        by sconeu (64226) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @01:31PM (#17922890) Homepage Journal
        I've never understood the infatuation with flip-phones

        No keyboard locking necessary. I can't count the number of times my wife has forgotten to lock the keyboard on her Nokia, and buttons get pushed on it in her purse.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:"Why didn't I think of that?" (Score:4, Interesting)

          by Retric (704075) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @03:50PM (#17924862)
          The problem with that story is once your break it it's no longer an egg. It's the same with this keyboard idea many have considered placing the keyboard on the other side but considered it useless to not have the screen visible while you type. To truly be a "novel" solution it needs to not just be "new" but also useful. Otherwise several people may have considered and rejected the idea. Which is why you can patent using an existing drug to treat a new disease. Drug patents are not just about the drug but how to use or make it.
          [ Parent ]
        • by squiggleslash (241428) * on Wednesday February 07 2007, @05:35PM (#17926184) Homepage Journal

          Good story, and it reminds me of another story, involving - interestingly enough - Christopher Columbus again.

          In the story, Christopher Columbus attends a meeting involving Craig McCaw, Christopher Gent, Steve Jobs, and the entire staff of Nokia. Christopher asks all the people in attendance to design an easier way of entering text messages into a cellphone. After all those present have tried and failed, they state that it's impossible to get better than iTAP. Columbus then pulls out a whopping great IBM Model M keyboard, attaches it to his phone, and types in his text message. Columbus then states that it is "the simplest thing in the world. Anybody can do it, after he has been shown how!"

          Columbus then went on to patent his invention, but in one of the great tragedies of science and technology, received nothing in royalties due to the slight issue with his "solution" being as idiotic as his more famous attempt to stand an egg on end.

          It's a sad story, I know.

          [ Parent ]
  • haHA (Score:5, Funny)

    by TinBromide (921574) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:02AM (#17920724) Homepage
    Gonna get rich! I just filed a patent for the upsidedown laptop, where you pull up the keyboard and look down at the screen.

    Makes it easier for those of you who type with your feet. (I'm looking at YOU, AOLers...)
  • Garmin GPS did this 10 years ago (Score:5, Informative)

    by cvd6262 (180823) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:04AM (#17920742)
    I bought a Garmin GPS12 [garmin.com] back in '98 that had the screen on the bottom. It made for great one-hand used.

    I guess adding "cellphone" to a design is just like adding "on the Internet" to a business plan.
  • Not Why Didn't I Think of That (Score:4, Insightful)

    by ISoldMyLowIdOnEbay (802697) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:05AM (#17920754)
    More

    How the H*ll Can You Patent That?
  • Layout patent? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by FredDC (1048502) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:06AM (#17920778)
    How is it possible to patent the layout of something? I'll just go and patent a much used way of laying bricks on top of eachother and everyone who builds a house has to pass by my bank account first? This patenting is getting way out of hand!
  • Nothing new (Score:5, Informative)

    by earthloop (449575) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:07AM (#17920792) Homepage
    Ericsson did this way back in 1999 with the "Hedvig".

    Project was cancelled, one reason being users didn't like the upside down configuration.
  • No more dirty screen ? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Rastignac (1014569) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:08AM (#17920810)
    The screen (at the bottom) won't be touched by the ear, so it will stay clean.
    No more dirty sticky traces on the screen !
  • Baseball caps (Score:3, Informative)

    by xs650 (741277) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:09AM (#17920830)
    What's next, a patent on wearing baseball caps backwards?

    As another poster said. my 7 year old Garmin MAP12 handheld GPS had the screen on the bottom and buttons on the top.
  • 'Texting' (Score:4, Funny)

    by bytesex (112972) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:13AM (#17920896) Homepage
    Brought to you for the people who do the most 'texting' (shudder at the term); British teens. So what if you gave one of 'em, when, in a rare moment, they use their phone for its intended purposes, a big push on the phone: they'd press all the buttons at once with their zitty cheecks. You'd have to scrape all that pus out from in between the buttons. Yek.
  • I can't help thinking that... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by TheSHAD0W (258774) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:15AM (#17920916) Homepage
    ...the iPhone can do this in software. :-P
  • Plenty of Prior Art (Score:3, Informative)

    by LordSchnitzel (677741) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:17AM (#17920952)
    Here's a phone by B&O that came out in europe two years ago: http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/serene-bang- -olufsens-upside-down-cellphone-210756.php [gizmodo.com]
  • by neonux (1000992) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:31AM (#17921160)
    "A patent has been filed for the "Upside Down Slashdot" which features the comments on top and the fucking article on the bottom. The idea behind the upside down Slashdot is, apparently, to allow quicker reading by not having to RTFA. A quick check of this seems to confirm the theory, making this one of those "Why didn't I think of that?" moments."
  • It's an *application* people (Score:4, Insightful)

    by hacksoncode (239847) on Wednesday February 07 2007, @03:18PM (#17924416)
    Complaining about the ridiculousness of a pending patent *application* is about as useful as complaining about people spending time thinking of what they'd wish for if they found a bottle with a genie in it.

    So someone thought they had a cool new idea because they hadn't ever seen anything like it and they were wrong... so what? If the patent *issues* then there's something to complain about (though pointing the patent office at the prior art would be a useful public service, unlike whining on Slashdot).