Hacking the Free "La Fonera" Wireless Router 67
wertarbyte writes, "FON is still giving away their wireless routers for free in Germany and Austria until Wednesday — under the premise that the devices will be connected and used as FON access points. The router, called 'La Fonera,' is a variant of OpenWRT, but locked down to prevent modification, including a signed firmware image to prevent the upload of new software. It is, however, possible to get shell access by connecting to a serial port present on the circuit board. And now two students from Germany have discovered vulnerabilities in the CGI scripts used to configure the device, and successfully activated an SSH daemon on the device by exploiting them, giving owners a root shell on their router. They also provide a detailed description of the procedure and 'ready-to-use' perl scripts to open up your router."
Whats so great about this? (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe Im crazy but I think the FON system is very clever and if peope werent abusing it, it might take off interesting ways. Instead it "doodzz free wireless routers here!!!" Shame really.
Reminds me of something... (Score:1)
You can't give geeks a free gift then cry when they use it for something other than you intended. That business model has been proven unworkable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Morally, there is a difference. Cuecat was a lame method of delivering ads; fair game. This, I gather, is service to share wifi access: unless I misunderstand, it's providing a real service. Hacking this is like hacking a P2P client so you can leech without uploading; or even more, like those assholes [slashdot.org] who "hacked" (in this case, meaning stealing) rental bicycles to get free rides.
Re: (Score:1)
Hacking is an important and necessary part of the geek approval process. Once the hackers give the rest of us geeks the thumbs up, we(the rest of us - non-network device hackers) know it's ok to pick one up and check out and at our own dis
Re: (Score:2)
Okay, point taken, investigatory hacking isn't evil. I've read one of the articles which was about mostly monitoring what it did. But obviously some will use this to make it a private server, breaking the implied contract (talking morally, not legally). But this will be beyond most users, so it's probbaly not going to make much impact on the scheme if it is on the up-and-up.
Re: (Score:1)
Not as much of a difference to CueCat as you might think. The firmware on the box is signed and locked, preventing you from customizing it. Their business model doesn't have any allowance for pricing that reflects the costs of providing a Fon service (which is an issue in those parts of the world that still have volume-based pricing or volume limits on services) and also doesn't guarantee that you'll see any money out of it anyway.
obDisclaimer: I wrote Charon [wiki.rcpt.to] with a mind to specifically dealing with thes
Re: (Score:2)
But is the system just locked down per se or is there anything legally binding in the agreement against hacking it? The serial port headers are a well-known attack vector, almost as much as several cgi-bin scripts, if they are just using the standard ones... Makes me wonder if the default config allows access to those scripts only from a LAN wired port (as opposed to the WAN side), or if it potentially allows anyone to get in.
if it is free, take two (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Haven't you heard the joke on how the Jews got the _Ten_ Commandments?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I disagree. It is quite like an item they bought and are hacking to get more features out of-- the only difference is the price.
If a provider is detrimentally underpricing an item on just the hope-- and no more certainty than that-- that people will use their other related more expensive items or methods to make up the cost, than that company is the one t
Assorted thoughts on the Fonera (Score:4, Interesting)
First at all, it isn't called "La Fonera". "La" in Spanish is just the "The" article, making it the Fonera, a Fonera, or how you want to call it.
It is free too here in Spain, but obtaining it's a really strange scheme that looks a lot like a scam to get private info from people. For example, it was offered for free for the readers of a well known digg-like web and they recommended to use the same user and password to request it as the people had in the web page?! WTF!? And a month later they bought part of the page!!!!
Extremely strange.
And what to say of the Fonera using hidden DNS servers property of the FON makers or scripts allowing free access for them with root privileges to your private network?
--
Superb hosting [tinyurl.com] 200GB Storage, 2_TB_ bandwidth, php, mysql, ssh, $7.95
Re: (Score:2)
I am aware that "La" is an article in Spanish, but the device is called "La Fonera" on the german FON website [fon.com] ("Hol dir deine gratis La Fonera" == "Get your free La Fonera").
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Ugh, I wouldn't take a flier from Circuit City as an authority to abuse the language like that.
Re: (Score:2)
Fon is a good idea, but sketchy implementation (Score:4, Informative)
Also, the only way to access your wired network from the wireless is to allow ALL wireless users to have that access. Well, okay, you could do things like SSH out to a machine on the Internet, SSH back in, and set up port forwarding that way, but nobody would ever do that :). And your own wireless access is treated the same as everybody else's-- you have to log in every time. Annoying in combination with Firefox2's ability to resume sessions-- it loads the Fon login redirection page for every tab you had open.
They've been promising a firmware fix which would allow two SSIDs with different configurations for a long time, but last I checked it still isn't out.
The upshot of this is that I thought I would be getting a nifty solution which would let me share my access while covering my own needs. Instead I really have to run two routers, one for me, and one for everybody else. And despite the fact that I live in a pretty densely populated area, in about six months the number of people who have signed on to the Fon router, besides me, is zero. Oh, correction: the buddy who told me about Fon came by and tried to sign in with his account, which he is supposed to be able to do as a "Linus" user. That didn't work either.
In summary... it's more work and their system is not transparent or secure (oh yeah, there's no encryption on the wifi connections). It's a nifty idea, but I can't really recommend it.
Re: (Score:2)
It's an interesting idea, but their site needs work. I tried to use the map to find access points and I couldn't make heads or tails out of it. It's a machup with Google Maps and seemingly works, but there's weird inconsistancies and it's hard to use in general.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
(and yes, I have one - although I don't live in a place where I'd expect to get anybody to take advantage of it other than me)
Re: (Score:2)
dude.. (Score:1)
geeks will be geeks (Score:2)
I guess you have a valid point here. Then again, there may be some of us who feel a value calculation like yours is less impressive than the joy of finding a way.
usage metering? (Score:2)
So I'm wondering how people are going to use this thing.
Re: (Score:1)
German courts now ruled that if you're running an unsecured WLAN and somebody unknown does bad things via it (i.e. leech kiddie pron or infringe some copyrights by running p2p apps) you're fully responsible for that. I guess Austrian courts wont rule differently.
And somehow I doubt you'll be able to get any info on who used your AP from fon.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You can get a DSL capped at 2Gbyte per month, if you want, but why if you can get it totally unlimited for 2 or 3 more per month?
inode flat rate. (Re:usage metering?) (Score:1)
mod him up, pls (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
secondly, I do believe the GPL trumps the "contractual" agreement as Fon would be found to be not in compliance by
Re: (Score:2)
The SSH key on the FON server. It prevents this kind of spoofing.
I got one of the older ones (Score:3, Interesting)
Based on a cursory examination, I determined the system was insecure. Suppose I enable the router, and somebody comes near and tries to connect. To connect, they try to connect to my wireless network, and the AP authenticates them against the FON RADIUS server.
Now, the problem is that I'm in control of the router, so I can easily fetch their username and password. SSL wouldn't help because at best you have User AP RADIUS, as my understanding is that the AP isn't acting as a router here. The user isn't talking to the RADIUS server directly, the AP does on his/her behalf. So there's no way of stopping me from sniffing people's passwords.
After I get passwords I can easily find some other FON AP, use somebody else's credentials, and have reasonable chances that the person getting in trouble for downloading/uploading something illegal won't be me.
I voiced my concerns on the forum, but the replies weren't satisfying, so now I reflashed it with new firmware and there's no FON-related stuff left on it.
Re: (Score:1)
Been there, done that (Score:1)
Not regional (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Free = $14.10 in America
Re: (Score:2)
OT perhaps, (Score:1)
The reality behind FON's hype [tech.am]
and much more at:
tech.am [tech.am]
(I am in no way connected with this site, apart from the fact that I occasionally enjoy reading it)
Well at least we can now fix annoying bugs (Score:3, Informative)
things such as opening up the POP SSL ports (993 and 995).
FONERA only allows access to ports 80 and 445 to the internet even on the *private SSID*, making it useless for me as the sole router.
Also, even is the router gives the public and private clients different IP addresses to theoretically prevent the public from browsing on my private LAN, well they are on the same subnet and I can type my private LAN ips from the public network and get access!
This thing then NATs my NAT, making it even more difficult for me to sandbox it properly.
Hopefully, open-wrt will make it more useful as a mini mail server or something like a mini Asterisk server.
Re: (Score:1)
Wow, no wonder people consider it to be insecure...
Sign me up (Score:2)
I'm not interested in hacking the device or anything, but I am interested in using it and promoting the service. The more of these there are in the wild, the more opportunities there are for me, as a registered use
The bug (Score:2, Informative)
Fon's service is... questionable. (Score:2)
It's a bug on ther website (Score:1)
Should take FON a minute to fix it and then they can see which users are trying to hack into the router. Remember, they know the MAC-address of the router they sold you.
This will be useless tomorrow.