Desktop Replacements and the 11 Pound Pencil

Marco Ramius writes "Tom's Hardware Guide has an article up entitled 'Unwieldy Laptops or Portable Desktops?' in which the author lugs an Alienware Area-51m desktop replacement to a 32 hour LAN to assess what advantages and disadvantages desktop replacements have over desktops themselves." They also have a related article entitled The Case of the 11 Pound Pencil where an office adopts a desktop replacement solution to unsatisfactory ends. Both interesting looks at appropriate uses for hefty hardware.

Alienware Area-51m

This my friends is the source of global warming. A machine that puts out so much heat that you can feel like stripping down as soon as its powered up can melt the polar ice caps. These should be banned in Antarctica and Canada.

Shared devices

When my old Sony VAIO died, I cried. It had no CD-rom, no floppy, and was so thin and tiny that it went everywhere. It barely had any ports. When I needed to burn a CD or connect a peripheral, the network or USB gave me the option, which I rarely used. Now that Sony is on my hit list, I couldn't find a decent replacement, so I bought a reasonbly tiny Compaq (yes, shudder, but it works great) until someone releases a real "on the go" laptop that works well.

I always get aggravated the the market for desktop replacements is to totally replace everything you'd do on a desktop. For me, I prefer a memory stick over a CD-R. I don't need video outputs, and the need to shove every port into a portable machine doesn't seem cost or space or energy efficient.

How many of you with desktop replacements are really using all the options built into it? Hasn't the Internet mostly reduced the need for all these external connection points? For me, I set up a private WiFi AP at every location I visit, and I never have to worry about anything but battery life (I hate plugging my laptop in even to the AC outlet).

Re:Shared devices

I am a consultant. I spend 8 - 10 hours at a client, then go home and work for another 3 or 4 hours. I have a HP Pavilion zd8000. It has enough horse power to run WebLogic, MQ, Apache, Oracle, Eclipse, and any other office productivity software I need to get my work done. It is heavy, yes. But to keep that much software in sync between home and work would be almost impossible. I never worry about performance, the screen is wide and gives me the ability to have lots of windows open. The only anoying thing is the power brick. Although I just might invest in a brick for home and at work.

Re:Shared devices

I agree, there's a lot of people *cough*managers*cough* who get the top end, desktop replacement 'because their role demands it' and then lock it in the drawer at night when they go home. If that's how it's used, get a desktop.

I have a Thinkpad T42 - and I use the modem, built-in wireless, built-in network, PC-Card slots, both USB ports, headphone & mic sockets & CD/DVD drive almost daily.

The only things on this that I don't use are the PS/2 keyboard socket and parallel port. The CD-Writing is rarely used too, but has saved my bacon a couple of times on-site (if I had an external writer, Murphy tells me I'll leave it at home when I need it most).

So while a lot of people can work with a laptop with minimal features (or even a desktop) some of us really do use the 'desktop replacement' features to their utmost. Once I get back to the office, this laptop slips into the docking station and works seamlessly with a nice big external TFT, keyboard and mouse, USB hub, network connection, etc.

Not to say I wouldn't prefer it was lighter, but it's far from the one in the linked article!

Mark

Re:Shared devices

> Aye I'm not sure why the T42 has a parallel port.

Walk into the average office building and you'll see a bunch of HP departmental laser printers that all have parallel ports (and very few if any have USB). If you think of the on-site salesman or consultant, they want to be able to print without worrying about how to get on someone's network.

The 11lb. pencil is an example

of how NOT to do an IT project. (No talking to end users before implementation, questionable usage of laptop, wrong choice of laptop for use if OK, and no benefit to effencies or data retention.)

The Desktop Repleacement Laptop, is an interesting read: The machine held up in the LAN Party (E.G. Extremely heave use) for the first 2/3 of the party, then started giving some errors that they have seen in desktops as well. The Machine itself appears to be a desktop shoehorned into a LARGE laptop case.

While personally, transportable computers are anathama to me. (I don't want anything over six pounds (3Kg.) If you really want to run fraggers that most of my machines will choke on... more power to you. No, literally - remember to bring an extension cable.

my $.02

Come again?

"they have had something of a mixed reception among IT professionals."

Since when did any "IT Professional" ever consider purchasing a fucking AlienWare machine? A laptop that has "a little alien head on the back"? Or is someone trying to convince me that gamer kids should now be considered "IT Professionals"?

Re:Come again?

Since when did any "IT Professional" ever consider purchasing a fucking AlienWare machine? A laptop that has "a little alien head on the back"?

Well... Maybe the guys who work at SETI ;)

Re:Come again?

If you work at a company casual enough to permit employees to wear Thinkgeek apparel and have various tchotchkes/toys/etc at their desks, a little alien head on your laptop doesn't seem so bad. Most of their "business" offerings have pretty muted styles compared with their gamer machines.

If I were a sales guy, whipping out an OMGGAMEZ0RD00D laptop might look a bit professional, especially when the Quake "humiliation" sound plays instead of the usual "ding" beep. For IT folks in an office it's no worse than lugging around a Dell 8000/9000 laptop.

This reminds me of...

...George Carlin's [wikipedia.org] theory of stuff. I have a desktop computer at home, and then I go on vacation with my laptop, which I leave in my hotel room. I leave my hotel room with my PDA, which I leave in my car. My PDA stays in the car, and I bring a pencil and notepad to the park where I scribble my deep thoughts [wikipedia.org].

Typical

This happens all over. I've fought with more small businesses about spending a little bit of extra money to test a "solution" now rather than scrapping a "solution" later than I can count. It's absurd, and it's something I'd assume advanced business degree wielding managers would understand. As a result, many places I've worked have had their own versions of 11# pencils... like printing one copy of a several hundred page document for each region to be mailed to a print shop in that region so that photocopies can be made...

Frustrating.

Are Lan Parties still Revalant.

With almost everyone having having highspeed internet. Which seems to counter act the old problems of Lag. I mean it is not like the old days of 1995 where you needed to connect the computers up to a Hub or a Null Modem cable to play these game. Because the average rate of house to house comunication was 14.4k. If you are a gamer just get a mega system with more wires then there are bacteria on your keyboard. Save the laptop for "Professionals" who need to do less System intensive applications and whos poor computer perfomance will not bother other people.

Re:Are Lan Parties still Revalant.

Some geeks actually like to leave the house and meet other people once in a while.

Yes, they are

The high-speed connection at home can never replace the feeling of being in a hall with 150+ other nerds.
Also, a LAN tends toward rock-solid near-zero latency. I know that many FPS gamers appreciate this.

Lag...

I know ppl on DSL and Cable, and lag is occuring spuriously and even disconnects
as the internet traffic is continuing to rise , but the backbone Infrastructure
is not receiving upgrades at critical points .

This is causing slow web browser loads, intermittent disconnects, and ping times
that spike from time to time at predictable points along a trace route .

The choke points are literally choking, and you can run network monitoring
tools to see where various ISPs and long haul providers are skimping
on spending and it is causing odd behaviour from our broadband .

It doesn't happen all the time, but at peak usage times it is more prevelant .

Ppl in online games like everquest often type in messages to ppl on different
ISP networks the question "lag???" and get a chorus of resounding echoes "yes" .

Some of this could be blamed on the game servers, and networks til you look at
a test that was done by myself .

Different game, Different provider, Different ISP, corresponding lag spikes .

Key points of DNS or routing is reaching critical mass .

It could be the massive increase of p2p apps, it could just be total traffic,
I do not know, but it does pose a important question.

How bad is this going to get ?

Ex-MislTech

Re:Are Lan Parties still Revalant.

Yes slashdot....a female

Hosts Mom?

Duplex Printers

FTFA: Why, oh why didn't they spend a few thousand dollars to buy for enough duplex printers like HP's 1320 for each office?

He also mentioned showing them how to flip the page.

I have an old HP 682C. When I first got it for a Windows 95 system, HP's driver had a duplex feature built in. When you selected duplex printing, it would prompt you with a picture showing you exactly how to flip the pages around and insert back into the machine to print on the other side.

Now, on XP, I have to use the MS driver. It doesn't have a duplex feature so I have to do it manually, remembering that when printing even pages only that I have to set the "print in reverse order" check box. Sometimes I forget and waste a tree. And for some wacky reason, I just can't get MS Word to do this correctly. It's like it ignores the check boxes or something - Arrg!

My point is: doesn't HP's drivers come with this "manual" duplex feature anymore? That way, these folks on really tight budgets can get a much cheaper machine and still print "duplex" without having to remember or read notes on exactly how to position the paper. Yeah I know, it does seem like an incredibly stupid thing to deal with. But when you have a lot of shit going on, it's really easy to screw it up.

portable ENIAC

First of all, I'd like to say that I don't even own a laptop. I'm the last of a dying breed.

Having that said, I'd like to say that I agree with this article. I think a lot of laptop use does not offer any benefits. I also think a lot of laptops are overkills.

Examples:

• Back in college, I took a software engineering class where I was the only student without a laptop. I also go the highest grade in the class. The laptops were distractions. I saw people using instant messenger, playing video games, reading slashdot... (cricket, cricket). I thought it was a complete waste. They didn't offer any "educational benefit" whatsoever.
• My dad works as a plumbing and mechanics inspector in one of the richest counties in America. This is funded by the county government. They have provided him with a Sony 4 megapixel digital camera, a Samsung Blackberry PDA, and a Panasonic Toughbook laptop. Now his job is to make inspections to ensure there are no code violations (this is the complex part). He then takes pictures with the camera, puts them on the laptop, and emails them to the office. He then uses his PDA to update the status of the request. While I'm sure this is a very effective system, he doesn't need a $40,000 twelve pound laptop that can survive a two-story drop, works underwater, and can render 3D graphics in 2400x2000 resolution.

Now before anyone goes jumping down my throat, I'm only saying that most people don't seem to understand that buying the biggest, most expensive laptop isn't always the right choice. I don't expect a lot of those people to be reading this article right now, and I do think that laptops can be used effictively and efficiently by people who know what they are doing. I just think that 90% of the time, this is not the case.

Re:portable ENIAC

You're right, a Toughbook is way too much for your dad's job. In order to prevent this shocking misuse of equipment, I hereby volunteer to take it off his hands. I know, I know... it's a dirty job, but somebody has to do it.

HP pavilion ZD8000

My desktop replacement notebook does just what I need it to do, it replaced my desktop. Plus it's mobile. I spend 90% of my time using it near an outlet anyway, so the brick just goes everywhere with me and the machine itself. Combined weight with brick and targus case is ~15 pounds. Battery lasts about an hour unless you try something ridiculous like transcoding and burning a dvd.

The nice thing is, the 2.8 GHz processor and constantly running fans literally warm up the entire room where I happen to be working and provide a pleasant, white-noise droning all the time. My hands stay nice and toasty because there are built-in handwarming areas. Plus I can keep my coffee reasonably warm by resting it on top of the power brick.

All in all, no complaints from me.

This is a product review?!

In the final third of the LAN, however, we began to notice increased instability that was not allayed by restarts. All the games we played would switch to the desktop, though strangely not crash entirely, at random intervals. This was an annoyance, needless to say, and damn well fatal during one or two of our more infamous matches.

We can only put the instability down to sheer wear and tear.

Wait a second. This machine got a positive review. I'm sorry, but I don't see how instability after 24 hours of usage on a brand new machine can in any way be considered tolerable unless usage involves throwing large blunt objects at the thing. What am I missing here? I can think of a lot of processor intensive tasks that take longer than 24 hours to complete, and I *really* do not want to see any instability while they are in the middle of running. Are my expectations out of line here?

Re:This is a product review?!

Ever been to a lan-party? I don't know this one in particular, but the last one I attended took place in a gymnasium and had about 200 participants. After about 20 hours we had to have doors open and bigass fans running to circulate cool outside air inside for two reasons:

1) The stink
2) The gymnasium AC wasn't buit for 200 people each toting a 300 W rig. That's about 60 kW of heat being dumped into the air constantly.

We hit temperatures of abut 35 deg C (95 F) in the middle of the gymnasium before the doors were opened.

I wouldn't be surprised if this was part of the problem. Using a computer in a non ventilated hot area will make it difficult for it to be stable if it's only designed to be used in "normal" temperatures. Doesn't matter if it's a laptop or a desktop at that point.

Machine was in motion for 32 hours straight - how?

The gaming fun and festivities began with a round of Counter-Strike Source, went through various strategy games, and was interspaced with bouts of Unreal Tournament 2004 and various single-player games along the way. The machine was in motion for 32 hours straight.

Was this done by one person or a group? From the article you would think that the guy sat there playing games for 32 hours straight.
If it was just one person, this marathon gaming feat should be immediately entered into The Guinness Book of World Records. [guinnessworldrecords.com]
There are currently no entries for marathon LAN gaming.

firewire?

It's great to see that a laptop with 2 cd drives, 4 usb ports, etc etc still does not have a full-fledged 6-pin firewire port.

Less of a difference than there used to be.

With the large adoption rate of LCD monitors for desktops and the use of USB/Firewire on both laptops and desktops, the difference between the two is getting smaller and smaller from a usage and space standpoint (and even from a price standpoint). I've even seen some of the low end Compaq desktops using a keyboard that is basically an external laptop keyboard, shallow buttons and all. I haven't used a desktop for regular daily work in about two years. Even though I used to loathe laptops, I don't really miss using a desktop as much as I thought I would. In fact, last year I bought my first laptop for home use. I use it to play games and browse while my old desktop is connected to the TV as a media player and my older desktop sits in the basement largely unused (might make it a MAME/emu gaming machine or a file/print server). I don't think the desktop will ever die out but with laptops being about as cheap as desktops nowadays I can certainly see laptops becoming (if they're not already, I have no idea) the primary computer that families buy for their home, especially if they have a wireless Internet setup.

RAID array!

From TFA:

...there's even a RAID array!

Wow, how'd they pack all those drives in there?

One computer.

I know that this is a shocker but many people only have one computer. For those a desktop replacement laptop can be a good option. I know that many of us have at least a whole room dedicated to their computers but we are the minority.
For some home users the fact that they can just put it into a desk drawer when they are "I know this part will shock you all" not using it is a big plus.
What is even more strange is some people don't think that computers are an attractive part of their home decor and want them out of site when not in use.
That ideal set up is a small light notebook for portable use and a desktop for heavy use but for many they have to find a one computer solution.

What is the need?

In my environment I hear a lot of people buying laptops mainly because you can fold them away and saving space. Some people want to buy laptops and do all kinds of demanding things on their battery, which is simply unrealistic. If you buy a multimedia machine with a lot of "bells and whistles" then you should expect very short battery times, bye bye dream. If you consider games to be not fast enough yet, allthough your desktop has a serious expensive 3D card, laptops will never be as good.

If laptops are not good workstations / gaming stations or burning batteries, they still have aesthetics and can be easily put out of sight. Which most of not-geeks would prefer. Office work can be done to perfection with a seriously effcient equiped laptop (centrino for example), presentations and 5 hours battery life.

A nonconformistic gamer doesn't buy a laptop, it's a nice ac-adapter-driven media-center, and a nonconformistic company owner/ salespeople probably want one. For aesthetics there is so much room for improvement, Apple has some answers. However I would like to see a good looking efficient laptop or a good looking nonbox like desktop computer, great at games and playing media (broadcasting over the net) And in the mean time,unless youre in the office stuff, why even pay so much for so little portabillity and power?

Small form factor systems and eSATA

I think a better compromise is an SFF using eSATA drives. I have an iDEQ 200N ( AMD Althon XP) and iDEQ 330P ( AMD64 x2 ), and I can use eSATA to 'share' the i386 operating system. I can even carry it with me, and use it whereever. This is an option for Linux, but it's not possible with some OS like Windows that don't like you to swap motherboards, etc.

I run an internal AMD64 build of ubuntu on the 330P, and load the i386 as a chroot. I also have a windows and OS X development enviroments under the Linux i386 image. It's a portable solution for my development needs, and my eSATA case can also do USB 2.0 for lower end machines without eSATA.

The cure for the 11 lb pencil

The cure for the 11 lb pencil is the one ounce Hipster [43folders.com] PDA.
My laptop and Palm have been sitting in a drawer since I started using a Hipster...

Two Words:

Link Whore.

Now, I now we all need to pay for our precious little websites somehow, but if the real estate is 90% advertising and 10% "original content" -- and a one-page article is spread across five, I stop reading...well, lately I don't even start. The advertisements wouldn't bother me as much if people would just keep the article all on one page. You know, we do have these things called "scroll bars," so we don't have to load the same 1MB of crap five times just to find out what happened to sister Debbie's "11lb pencil."

Honestly...

perfect for iMac

This is the scenario for an iMac.... replace a tower + screen with a small footprint all in one. Laptops don't make for great desktop replacements... they are too cramped, not ergonomic... display is too small, etc. etc. for day to day office use. They are even less expandable and upgradeable than an all in one type pc, the list goes on.

iMacs are wonderful for desktop use and relatively portable when it comes down to it... ie: you can move them around by yourself... all the connections are easy to get to, they have built in wireless so no need to rewire or extend the network to a new space.. if you have a wall port for ethernet no problem... built in speakers and headphone jacks for privacy... the new ones have the built in iSight for video conference and all have a built in mic for audio conference. New ones have bluetooth built in for use with wireless input and for synching up your pda with entourage or ical....

Bonjour is a god send for IT... just buy a printer that uses zeroconf and you'll never have label another ip address on it again just 'add printer' and pick bonjour , voila.. the printer shows up and will work without special drivers, though you may want to download them for extra features for special people...

So many nice things to say about the combo of OS X and iMac for office use.

Re:perfect for iMac

The majority of people I know who use laptops as desktop replacements have add on USB keyboards and mice they use at their desktop. With an iMac, you can't pick up your work machine, do a few hours work on the plane/train and get set up in a client's office in a minute: you have to have an extra laptop, which means duplicating files and setup.

Centrino laptops these days are powerful enough for most things (I can play BF2 on mine with decent graphics setttings) and have at least 3hr battery life in normal desktop usage

viva la resolution

I have seen laptops as toys ever since they came out, because the display resolution has always lagged so far behind what's available on a desktop that writing code—especially in an IDE—is a cruel joke.

As soon as I saw that someone had come out with a 1920x1200 laptop, I bought one, and now it's my primary machine. It was expensive, and there are things that annoy me about it, but you can't argue with being able to sit down in a coffee shop or on the plane and with two pages of code side by side and all of your debugging windows visible.

I can truly write code in comfort anywhere I want now, not just at my desk.

Catering to a specific niche market

There's a couple of users that really benefit from DTR's. Programmers and web developers heavily benefit from the WUXGA screens. Graphic artists require fast GPUs and dual core CPUs for rendering. Hardcore gamers simply require the best of everything.

I'd be hard pressed to find anyone else that could find the new 11lb DTRs useful. I have a sager 9750 and it suits my purposes perfectly (I'm a web developer, programmer, graphic artist and gamer). I do transport the machine, but rarely run it off of the built in UPS. Satisfies my needs perfectly.

Cheaper Than A New House

Well at least the luggables are cheaper than buying a new place. I generally prefer the white box PCs I've built myself because they can be upgraded as necessary very easily. But now, I'm facing the problem of needing to carve out another room in my place. So I'm thinking of desktop replacements that can be used anywhere in the house and turning the white box machines into servers and putting them in the closet. If I upgrade the home network as well, I might even be able to use the laptops as decent remote terminals to the servers for graphics intensive applications that I'd rather run on the servers. This would all not be cheap, but still much cheaper than buying a new, bigger, place and moving. So if the U.S. home market does cool off, maybe there'll be a little blip in sales of desktop replacements as more people choose to do more with less.

Right idea, wrong CPU

The 3.6 GHz of Pentium 4 power is desktop standard, and the mobile GeForce 6800

Or buy the Aurora M7700 [alienware.com], which is the same thing but with an Athlon 64 X2 CPU. Significantly less heat and way better performance. That would be much less likely to overheat than the P4 version. Plus bringing a recently purchased P4 machine to a LAN party is a good way to scream "CLUELESS!" to your fellow gamers.

Better yet, get the same Clevo D900K [amdboard.com] notebook without the expensive bling from a vendor with a less elaborate marketing department.

The Area 51 is worth it.

I purchased my Alienware this last November, and I'm not sorry in the slightest. 3.8GHz P4-hyperthreaded/2GB RAM (room for 4gb)/240 GB HD/DVD+-RW/Combo Drive/5.1 Dolby/17"/internal 802.11abg/12-in-1 card reader/video in AND out/256 MB Video, it just cannot be beat. Before my purchase, I put together the best laptops I could find on all the major manufacturers websites. They all came in at just a few hundred less, with half the specs. Heat is the major issue. I have found that if I can place my laptop where the video card vent hangs off the side of a desk, it stays cool. Some might complain about the weight. I carried more weight when I was in the Army. It lugs just fine, and I count it as more exercise. If I could wish for anything more, it would be room for just one more miniPCI slot, so I could have internal Bluetooth. It's got two cards, but they're already taken.

My Thoughts on Alienware m51-7700

Alienware m51 7700 is a performance beast. Problems: It is not doubt heavy for a laptop Another big problem is overheating. I have to throw something under the front to raise it up about a half, or else the fans underneath don't seem to pull enough air to keep it cool. Having your laptop shut down continuously is a pain in the ass. This only happens when I am playing graphics intensive games, and if I do not tilt it up with something; minor but VERY annoying. Alienware support sucks a big one too. I sent my laptop in for repairs (ya the damage was COMPLETELY my fault) and they lost my laptop for two weeks after they supposedly 'confirmed' they received it. Parts were backorder for two months, and then they shipped it out saying it could take a month or more to receive it (I am overseas military); it arrived in 6 days. Incompetent to the core. On the flip side, I definately disagree with the article about being unable to upgrade. The graphics card is a mobile PCI Express daughterboard you can unplug and take out, and therefore replace. I am sure they will offer better graphics cards in the near future from what I bought in mine, and there is nothing stopping me from calling Alienware, buying one, and upgrading it. It's less than 8 screws to do so. It _may_ even be possible to buy a card from a 3 party (have NOT looked into it) and upgrade that way too; there are less options than a desktop to be sure, but definately not impossibe. The CPU is easily accessible, and I'm sure can be upgraded, though I have not looked to see what processors the motherboard does support. You have 4 memory slots. You can insert two mobile HDD and two slimline CD/DVD drives. You can even upgrade the audio via PCMCIA/USB solutions. There are 4 USB ports and 2 firewire ports for additional peripherals. That's similar to most desktops, so you can't argue on that from either. I'm not really sure where he was going on that one.

There's a trade-off, of course

We all want to have it all, but like every other area of life, choosing a notebook involves choosing between incompatible choices. You can have small, thin, and light, or you can have powerful and robust. There doesn't seem to be an option for an ultra-thin, ultra-light notebook with a top-of-the-line processor and long battery life.

My personal leaning has always been towards the small/lightweight side of the equation. After all, I'm much less likely to lug around a 15x17", 15-pound behemoth that runs on batteries for 20 minutes than I am to tuck my 8x11" 4-pound powerbook under my arm. As it is, I still frequently leave the PowerBook behind when I don't think I'll need it. Of course, I do carry it to meetings and when I'm traveling overnight--but there are a lot of times when it might be nice to have it "just in case" where I leave even this fairly small and light computer behind.

I'd rather...

Have all the features and not need them rather than need them and not have them. I have a DTR (Dell XPS Gen2) that has saved my ass with its burning capabilities when I've been out in the field and needed a driver or something for a PC that didn't have a functioning USB port to work with my flash drive (I've worked on some fairly old workstations). It's also nice to be able to game a bit when there's some downtime and not have to go to my desktop to play.

I long for a modern affordable clamshell pc

If someone would make one of those old clamshell style handheld pc's with a 3/4 size keyboard, wifi, and a decent sized hardrive, I would snap it up in a minute. Something like the NEC 900 [necsam.com] with the current windows mobile os on it would be a killer app for college students. The ability to have an instant on device you could easilly type on to take notes in class and be online with (hell, throw in mp3 player and video too) and it would be a nice alternative to lugging around a heavy laptop that takes forever to boot up and shut down.

Uh? Lightest Post!

Why are you lugging 11lbs worth of geekish love-handles? Shed some pounds! Go on a diet!

Try my Sony PCG-Z505HS with triple-battery life, tricked out with 120GB HD, built-in 100MB Ethernet which ONLY weighs ...

      3.75 lbs (8.2 kg)

That's right, only 3.75 lbs... Thinnest laptop alive today... It can be yours for only $249.99 from E-bay.

One can have running Gentoo Linux with seven VMWare images at your fingertips.

Love the dent-proof magnesium case.

The review sucks

I like the second article, but the first one really sucks. Sorry, but it does.

-No mention of the performance other than that it was okay for the LAN party.

-The reviewer says that the pictures don't really show the size of the machine. Well, why doesn't he take some pictures of the device instead of using photoshopped stuff that probably came from the manufacturer's press office??

-He talks about the weight and the battery life, but provides no information about it (apart from saying that it's heavier than a monitor).

Okay, maybe the reviewer was stll hung over from the LAN party. But then, why doesn't he wait until the next day to write a sensible review?
This review is nothing more than a feel-good piece of writing that does not provide much more info than what could be gleaned from the manufacturer's web site or a store. It's more like an ad-even though he mentions the problems that arose later on.

Portable, my ass

If you want a real laptop, import from japan. The libretto and the lifebooks are nice and small.

Portable computing has come full-circle. Desktop replacement laptops today are the lunchbox luggables of yesterday.

I want the ideal couch-coding machine

I'm guessing that a lot of people who don't need an ultraportable for travel, still need a fully functional machine that's reasonably easy to tote and use just about any place. I find I need a laptop that is in many ways a desktop replacement, that is, has all the hardware (CD burner, ethernet wireless, full keyboard), but doesn't weigh a ton.

Since I got wireless, I neglect my desktop and code (and surf and read and look up crap on imdb while I watch TV) on my couch. I find, though, that my 10-pound Dell Instpiron 5150 is too big. And what's with the damn fan on the bottom of the computer? That means I can't set the thing down on the sofa or the ottoman w/o worrying about it overheating.

For a lot of stuff, my work computer, a 15" Powerbook, is perfect -- great size, back-vented so I can set it on the sofa cushion, light enough both it and my bulldog can be on my lap at the same time, X11 -- but it's a pain in the neck to use for coding on Emacs. I need Control and Option keys on both sides of the space bar, dammit!

Workable desktop replacements

Personally, I hate the so-called "desktop replacement" notebooks that weigh 8 pounds or more, but I want pretty much all the functionality of a desktop computer. I wish I could use one of the little 12" ultralights, but I need more screen resolution to run Visual Studio and other apps effectively, and I hate integrated graphics.

My current compromise is to use a midweight (5-pound) notebook that's light enough to easily carry around most places -- for example, if I want to work through something over lunch, a 5 pounder is reasonable. It's practical to use for web surfing or (moderate) gaming while lying on the couch or in the car. For all of those things, a big notebook is overkill.

When I want something even more portable for using while walking around (or whatever) -- taking notes, playing MP3s, portable video player, mini-games, tasks, text reading -- I've found a Pocket PC pretty workable, though there are other similar alternatives.

Re:Well...

Had you RTFA'd, you would know that the "11lb Pencil" is a name that the editor from THG gave a HP laptop (can't remember the part number) that was given to employees to replace forms which were previously filled in with pencil. The new laptops and the associated changes with "going digital" were of little practical use. In the end, the things were no more useful than a pencil for the application they were purchased for, but much bulkier, hence the term 11lb pencil.

I'm not sure if the parent post was just unfunny or ignorant, but it's definitely -1 overrated.

Re:Well...

Sounds expensive ..... I would have thought you could get a pencil for eleven pence if you went to the right place!

Re:It's not a big deal

Oh, like this [xbags.com]? Jesus, search Google before you say something stupid. That took me all of 2 seco