Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Gaming Gear Showdown, Simplicity vs. Hype

Posted by timothy on Wed May 07, 2008 03:30 PM
from the do-these-ruffles-make-my-avatar-look-fat? dept.
Slack3r78 writes "Gizmodo is running a feature putting the gaming marketing hype to the test and seeing whether it really makes your playing any more 1337. They match up the latest products from Razer and SteelSeries along with some five-year-old Logitech products and come to the conclusion that ... it doesn't seem to matter that much. It looks like maybe you can't buy your way into finally beating that annoying 13-year-old at your favorite FPS after all."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Colin Smith (2679) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @03:32PM (#23329292)
    It's about the social status.

    Gotta be honest though. Having the 'leetest rig' just makes you top of a very small pile.

     
  • by Tominva1045 (587712) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @03:43PM (#23329446)
    That 13 year old is gonna own ya because he has become exhalted with the Scryers, has a sweet Tier 5 armor set, and spends all day dueling his homies because he doesn't have a job and can play WOW 13 hours a day. It's not the computer harware.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Actually, they were talking about fps not mmorpg. If the 13 year old beats you it's because of many reasons. The first is close to your point, and that is he has a lot of time to practice. No matter what input device you have, there must be some mastery to it. The other thing you can practice in is also the mechanics of the game. It doesn't matter how skillful at sniping you are if you're in close quarters with a shotgun. People who study the map know the right array of weapon pickups to have the advantage
    • If that 13 year old is using Tier 5 armor to own you (assuming pvp), you should probably look into some arena gear and other pvp gear that's *designed* for it, and stop trying to carry on with some pve gear that allows for big juicy crits on you.
  • Um (Score:4, Interesting)

    by dreamchaser (49529) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @03:55PM (#23329606) Homepage Journal
    I'm 41 and at most games I've play online, and they are many, I totally own the 13 year olds. They don't like it much either. Then again I've been playing various games in arcades on on PC's since I was...hmmm about 13. Maybe experience and natural dexterity is better than good gear or having too much time on one's hands?
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        Eh, I think it's not a bad point to make. The 13 year old uber gamer stereotype gets passed around a fair bit, so it's worth pointing out that it's not very common.
        • That was exactly my point. The meme of 13 year old uber gamers is very, very old and quite incorrect.

          I'm happy to say that I can enjoy recreation. I don't have much time to game these days but it's still a good outlet.

          The flames and naysayer posts are just jealous ;-)
      • I'm 41 and at most games I've play online, and they are many, I totally own the 13 year olds.
        I'm sure your mother would be proud.
        ... as she yells down the basement stairs to tell you that it's time for dinner.
      • Thank you, she is. Not because of my recreation activities but because of my other accomplisments in life like my career and my lovely family.
          • Nah. Experience has showed me that trying to be clever or thinking one is clever usually leads to failure. Read my latest journal entry and you might understand. I could care less how I'm moderated or what people think/say about me. I just like to talk sometimes (or type, as the case may be)
  • by netsavior (627338) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @03:58PM (#23329640) Homepage
    It is about buying a product that is comfortable to use for 18 hours straight. I mean in hour 1, I have the same skill with a $5 optical mouse on a piece of cardboard as I do with a reasonable mouse on a reasonable surface, but come see me in 18 hours with the crap setup and I will not be as sharp as with the comfortable one.
    • I'm prett sure you will be in the same state either way:

      Hungry, tired, thirsty, and in need of a trip to the nearest bathroom... unless you have the 1337 catheter add-on for your gaming rig.

      In that case, I guess you would be in better shape. Just hungry and tired, because you can always drink from the catheter.

      and I bet you would even be able to spell catheter at
      • Not only do I have the

        1337 catheter add-on for your gaming rig.
        but in an effort to reduce reuse and recycle, I use the urine as coolant to c001 my uber h07 processor! \rant - by the way, i'm hungry, tired, thirsty and in need of a trip to the nearest restroom, after only 2 hours of work.
    • Should we be more worried that being able to game for 18 hours straight is a requirement for you, or that your comment gained an "Insightful" moderation?
  • by Cthefuture (665326) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @04:04PM (#23329730)
    Games have gotten more and more sucky over the years. Everything is "realistic", slow and boring. Nobody plays the twitch games like Quake where it actually mattered how good your equipment was. This may be why the specialized gamer hardware does nothing.

    I have personally found that it's not hard at all to play games like COD, Crysis, Battlefield, etc. on a poor refresh rate LCD and piece of shit optical mouse. It just doesn't matter. There is no way I could kick ass in Quake3 with that stuff though because just moving the mouse fast enough makes it lose tracking. This is where better equipment could show its worth.
    • I love that people describe CoD, Crysis and Battlefield as "realistic" games.

      What the hell is realistic about any of them? Just because they aren't a methamphetamine induced hyper-kill-fest doesn't mean they don't require fast reflexes and accurate movements.
  • Coding keyboards? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by atrus (73476) <atrus@at[ ]trivalie.org ['rus' in gap]> on Wednesday May 07 2008, @04:10PM (#23329818) Homepage
    Now for what really matters, how do those keyboards do for coding? :-)

    I'm always interested in "better" keyboards for large volumes of text entry. It does get minus points for putting the Ctrl key in the wrong spot - who uses capslock anyway?

    • Gateway "AnyKey" keyboards.

      Every keycode was reprogrammable, so you could change each key's output (or key combo, like shift+ctrl+A) to any other letter, or series of letters up to 250 characters. Plus, it was self-contained. No external program necessary. Hit the remap button, select your target keypress, type in the new output you want, hit remap again, poof. OS and program independent.

      Plus it's got an additional 12 function keys down the left side. And a 9 button arrow key group. And after 12 years of us
  • 1 guy plays 1 game in 1 role for a mere 15 matches per game and somehow thinks that he has come to an "objective" conclusion regarding which is better? I hope he doesn't design nuclear reactors.
    • I agree. How is a completely subjective article written by some guy any kind of evidence that these are or are not better?

      My personal experience has been the opposite. When I went from an old 19" CRT to a crisp flat panel it improved my game. As did going from an old Intellimouse to a 3200 DPI "gaming" mouse. In both cases it was the improved resolution that helped me. In TF2 it's not something you notice much, but in CounterStrike getting your reticle right over someone's head - and fast - is crucial. (A

  • by The Moof (859402) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @04:18PM (#23329942)
    Honestly, I've never really cared about beating that 13 year-old kid.

    I always take the stance that I'm an adult who works 40+ hours a week and has other responsibilities that take my time. The kid likely plays every waking moment. The fact I can come close to beating him with significantly less practice says something about my skill at the game. Or the kid's.

    Then again, ignorance is bliss.

  • not a mouse, but i'll put out there that i'm enjoying the ideazon fang [ideazon.com] gaming keyboard i got a few months ago.

    i happened by it when looking for a usb keyboard after i decided i just cannot crouch, strafe diagonally, and change weapons at the same time with my wireless keyboard. i now use that + a usb extender on my living-room set-up (plus the extender enabled a wired mouse and microphone to be near me again too, while still stashing under the couch nicely)

    i like that it reaches for ergonomics and don't-hav
    • Re:You don't say? (Score:4, Informative)

      by Fx.Dr (915071) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @03:41PM (#23329424)
      Exactly.

      As stated at the end of TFA, just buy what feels comfortable - the rest will, or should, come naturally. If you have to contort your fingers to fit the mouse/kbd, it's only natural your game will take a hit.
      • Re:You don't say? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by keithjr (1091829) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @03:45PM (#23329460)
        Comfortable or not, it'll be a cold day in hell before I drop $150 on a keyboard, and another $90 for the mouse. The article really doesn't dwell on the cost factor, which for me is the major deterrent to buying "gaming gear."

        • Re:You don't say? (Score:4, Insightful)

          by Gerzel (240421) <brollyferretNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Wednesday May 07 2008, @04:49PM (#23330382) Journal
          High cost keyboards CAN make a difference in the long run, but not for gamers.

          For a typist the feel of the keys and layout of the keyboard really can cut down on wear and tear to the hands. An investment in a good keyboard can save you a payout for medical care later.

          Still in the world of ergonomics there are a lot of quacks so you really do have to do your research on what is truly a good keyboard.
          • by antifoidulus (807088) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @04:12PM (#23329836) Homepage Journal
            What is spending $150 on a Keyboard and $90 on a mouse when your talking about spending countless hours using them. Your getting a lot more bang for your buck then you would for darn near anything else you'd spend the money on.

            I dunno, your mom is going to want you to EVENTUALLY kick in for food and use of basement.....
          • Yes, to the above.

            I spend a lot of time on my gaming rig, and I want input devices that are not only comfortable, but fun to use. And I use Logitech for just about everything, including a G15 keyboard (the blue one), MOMO force-feedback wheel, MX620 mouse and Precision headset. Does spending all that money make me a better gamer? Probably not*, but do I enjoy playing video games with them? Definitely.

            *Actually, with the purchase of the mouse, it has. The MX620 is the same form factor as my mouse at work

      • by Slack3r78 (596506) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @04:04PM (#23329724) Homepage

        As stated at the end of TFA
        You know that you've just implicitly admitted breaking one of Slashdot's oldest and most revered rules, right? ;)
        • Don't worry, assumption and speculation are still my main source of info. :)

          I feel so at home here.
    • Re:You don't say? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by VeNoM0619 (1058216) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @03:43PM (#23329452) Journal
      I disagree. Sure "fancy" stuff won't make you game better, but functionality DEFINITELY has a huge effect on gameplay.

      The functionality of your mouse makes the greatest difference in a FPS: binding the extra buttons to prevent keyboard movement allowing you to continuously move/jump/crouch etc. to dodge instead of "press whatever key to throw grenade/use good gun". This assumes you have 2-3 fingers for movement, 1-2 for movement actions, you only have at best 1-2 random fingers lingering for a select few keys.

      My personal example would be playing spy in TF2, before I had my 8 button mouse I had issues stabbing engies while placing sappers immediately. Now, I can do it with 90% success - meaning I don't die. Why? Cause all I have to do is press left click, thumb click, left click, while maneuvering with keyboard effectively.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Which still doesn't warrant a gaming mouse. You just need a mouse with multiple buttons. The only factor that gaming equipment offers is comfort, basically you can play longer without wearing yourself out. Then again, maybe you have bigger problems if you're getting to the point where you can wear youreslf out.
          • Re:You don't say? (Score:5, Insightful)

            by vux984 (928602) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @04:35PM (#23330196)
            So, if that's what it all boils down to, than why bother calling this stuff "gaming" equipment?

            Its marketing. They've identified a target demographic with:
            a) interest in the product
            b) disposable income

            Your average enterprise manager isn't interested in equiping his team with higher quality peripherals, and is even less interested in shelling out for them. To a phb, they only reason you got an optical mouse was that they were the same price as wheel.

            Why can't you get the same features and comfort on something that doesn't have that doesn't make you look like a status-whore to own?

            You can actually. Razer for example has a 'pro' series of its mice that are white. And the product name is 'Click v1.6' or something instead of 'Death Adder in Biohazard Green', specifically to be more palatable to getting your PO approved at the 'office'.

            Logitech and Microsoft also make decent quality mice that aren't overly garish.

            But at the end of the day the big market for this stuff are teens. And they buy it as much for the status as the performance. And there is plenty of 'gaming hardware' that is ALL flash and no substance. The same 'Razer' that makes extremely good quality mice also has a 'cord manager' (to keep your mouse cord from getting out of control, pulling, tangling, etc. That little dohickey is little more than steel bolt and screw that that they charge $20 bucks for. You could improvise somethign equivalent from the hardware store for maybe $2.

            Other products, like gamers computer cases are often poorly designed cheap plastic monstrosities -- while others are genuinely high end product.

            Mousing around for eight hours a day is a significant part of many jobs the average /.er will take. You should have something better than a dollar-store wrist-rapist for that.

            You should. Do you? If not, why not?

              • Re:You don't say? (Score:5, Informative)

                by vux984 (928602) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @05:39PM (#23330968)
                Stop talking about Razer.

                I both mocked and applauded them in the same post.

                Why does anybody care about them?

                They make very good quality mice in general.

                They make very good quality AMBIDEXTROUS mice in particular.

                I hate ergonomic mice. As a left hander I find most of them, being designed for right handed people, extremely uncomfortable. Logitech, for example, doesn't make any of their worthwhile products in a left handed configuration, hell they don't make anything really good that's ambidextrous.

                Their mice only have two buttons,

                Mine (copperhead) has 6 'buttons', two of which are hard to reach. Plus a clickable scrollwheel, so 7 if you count that. Being that its ambidextrous I can forgive 2 buttons being hard to reach because its symmetrial. The buttons I can't reach are the right hand thumb buttons. I'm sure a right hander would find it equally awkward to press the two left hand buttons. But all the buttons are discrete and can be mapped independantly.

                and half of them have the laser in the ass for some bizarre reason.

                A lot of gamers hold the mouse with their fingers instead of resting their hand on it. And they make fine left/right mouse movements by swivelling the mouse with their thumb and ring finger, instead of actually pushing the whole mouse because you can make much more precise movements with minimal effort - e.g. for sniping. (imagine it was bolted to the table through the scrollwheel; that's the rough axis its swivelled on). Locating the laser in the 'ass' gives you better control and range doing this.

                Razer's not for everyone. I like their mice, not much else. Their cable management system and 'mouse surfaces' are a scam on par with Monster, I prefer the saitek eclipseII to their keyboards, and their headsets? Nothing wrong with them, but I use plantronics . And honestly evem with mice I recommend logitech to most people. They make some very well regarded mice. But if you are a left handed mouser logitech sucks complete and total ass.

                Like I said in my original post... you have to separate the quality products from the hype.
    • Re:You don't say? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by eln (21727) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @03:48PM (#23329508) Homepage
      You have more faith in humanity than I do.

      You could just as easily say that no one really believes their Monster cables make their stereos sound better. And yet, that company is still in business.

      I think for most people there is a psychological relationship between how expensive something is and how good it is. If these things cost $20, no one would even consider the idea that they would make anyone play better, even if they were built exactly the same. At $300, though, people are more likely to believe it.
      • Re:You don't say? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Shagg (99693) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @04:00PM (#23329672)
        You could just as easily say that no one really believes their Monster cables make their stereos sound better.

        Knowledgeable people don't believe it.

        And yet, that company is still in business.

        The world is full of stupid people.

        I think for most people there is a psychological relationship between how expensive something is and how good it is.

        Yep, see above. ;)
      • I think for most people there is a psychological relationship between how expensive something is and how good it is. If these things cost $20, no one would even consider the idea that they would make anyone play better, even if they were built exactly the same. At $300, though, people are more likely to believe it.

        There is a relationship there. Pick up "Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion" if you want a good book on the subject of marketting and persuasion. Often times it is more difficult to give aw

      • Re:You don't say? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by vux984 (928602) on Wednesday May 07 2008, @04:04PM (#23329722)
        an optical mouse is better than a ball,

        And a laser mouse is better than an optical mouse.

        a silent and/or small motion motion keyboard helps

        I tend to say, "go with what is most comfortable". Quality keyboards tend to have 2 crucial gaming features:

        1) more simultaneous key presses. Nothing sucks worse than side strafe moving while crouching and flicking the reload button and having nothing happen.

        2) quality = durability/consistency. the only thing that sucks worse than 1) above is playing on a keyboard where one of the w-a-s-d has gone 'squishy' or 'sticky' or otherwise doesn't have the same feel or travel as the other 3, for example. Any keyboard can fail, but cheap ones fail sooner and more often.

        most of these 15 button mice are useless because only the standard 5 buttons can normally be mapped without having to run some special software in the background which impeeds the performance

        Trading 0.1 fps to be able to run a useful mouse macro is nearly always worth it. The trick is coming up with useful macros -- some games have them... some don't.

          • 1) Something is wrong with your G5. Mine is smoove. This, of course, highlights the one big drawback with these fancy mice: you can't open them to clean them out or anything. My RMB has started sticking every now and then, and there's nothing I can do about it except run a toothpick through the groove. :/

            Let me clarify -- the wheel itself is fine but it absolutely blows as a middle mouse button. They completely compromised the clickability to get a left-right action that I never use into the mouse.

            I've been told the new MX Revolution is better, but I have no interest in wireless mice.

              • Honestly, I've gotten where I just hook up my G5 for gaming and leave my old MX500 at work for exactly this reason. I've never mapped the middle click for games, but given most browsers use it for opening/closing tabs, etc, it's more or less essential to me for anything other than games.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      You do realize that mouse sensitivity is COMPLETELY dependent on software, right? The "DPI" rating of your mouse hardware is totally irrelevant.

      Think about it. What's the smallest distance you can move your mouse pointer on screen? One pixel. No matter WHAT the DPI rating of your mouse is, this will never change. It's the sensitivity settings in software that are determining how far you have to move your mouse in order to move the pointer one pixel on the actual screen.

      DPI ratings are a scam on mice.