Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Memristor — 4th Basic Element of Circuits

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wed Apr 30, 2008 05:27 PM
from the old-meets-new dept.
esocid writes "Researchers at HP Labs have solved a decades-old mystery by proving the existence of a fourth basic element in integrated circuits that could make it possible to develop computers that turn on and off like an electric light. The memristor — short for memory resistor — could make it possible to develop far more energy-efficient computing systems with memories that retain information even after the power is off, so there's no wait for the system to boot up after turning the computer on. It may even be possible to create systems with some of the pattern-matching abilities of the human brain. Leon Chua, a distinguished faculty member at the University of California at Berkeley, initially theorized about and named the element in an academic paper published 37 years ago. Chua argued that the memristor was the fourth fundamental circuit element, along with the resistor, capacitor and inductor, and that it had properties that could not be duplicated by any combination of the other three elements."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Memristor Based RAM Could Be Out By 2009 142 comments
neural.disruption writes "According to the EETimes, HP is announcing that it 'plans to unveil RRAM prototype chips based on memristors with crossbar arrays in 2009.' I don't know if you remember the earlier story about HP Labs proving the existence of the Memristor that had been predicted in 1971 by Leon Chua, and has the nice property of maintaining a memory of the current that passes by it. This could bring us a new type of small non-volatile high-speed RAM at low cost because of the low complexity of the mechanism employed."
[+] HP Creates First Hybrid Memristor Chip 155 comments
An anonymous reader writes "HP researchers have built the first functioning hybrid memristor-transistor chip. Lead researcher Stanley Williams and his team built the very first memristor — the '4th fundamental element' of integrated circuits after resistors, capacitors and inductors — back in April. Memristors can remember their resistance, leading to novel electronic capabilities. The new FPGA circuit uses memristors to perform tasks normally carried out by (many more) transistors and is therefore smaller, more power efficient and cheaper to make, HP says. Memristors could also turn out to be a more compact, faster alternative to flash memory."
[+] New Memristor Makes Low-Cost, High-Density Memory 86 comments
KentuckyFC writes "A group of electronics engineers have discovered that a thin layer of vanadium oxide acts as a memristor, the fourth basic component of circuits after resistors, capacitors, and inductors that was discovered last year. At a critical temperature, a current passing through the layer causes it to change from an insulating state to a metal-like state, thereby changing its resistance (abstract). The effect lasts many hours — which is what makes the layer a memristor (a resistor with memory). The team says this could be scaled up to make resistive random access memory, or RRAM, at very low cost, from little more than layers of vanadium oxide."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • One more thing to wipe after surfing porn.
  • by fahrbot-bot (874524) on Wednesday April 30 2008, @05:41PM (#23257388)
    develop ... computing systems with memories that retain information even after the power is off, so there's no wait for the system to boot up after turning the computer on. ... create systems with some of the pattern-matching abilities of the human brain.

    As far as I know, human brains don't retain much information when the power is turned off and there's usually some trouble after the power is restored. Furthermore, I'm not sure how power-down information retention relates to pattern-matching abilities.

    But what to I know, I had my brain off last night.

  • I wouldn't say this is the 4th basic circuit element- that is quite a stretch.

    Basically you have Ohm's law which is v =Ri. There is a component for each variable: Capacitors for voltage, inductors for current, resistors for resistance. It is all there, in nice little differential equations.

    Yes, this is a great discovery. But please stop with the sensationalist headlines. This is getting out of hand.

    • hmm... electronics component which has a function that can not be duplicated by any combination of the other 3.... seems pretty basic to me. Perhaps Ohm's Law needs a revision, or perhaps it does not cover memristors.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 30 2008, @05:55PM (#23257576)
      What are you talking about? V does not equate to capacitors any more then it equates to electric generators or batteries. And where on earth did you get inductance as i? In many cases capacitors and inductors behave fairly similarly (baring the fact that inductors have a charge time). If anything inductors relate to a delta i and not i directly.

      Ohms law does not describe the basic componets of a circuit, it only provides a simply way to determine simple information about a simple circuit (Mainly a energy source, and a resistor). It has no room for capacitors or inductors. You need much higher math for that.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Unfortunately, everything about this device seems like higher math. If you bring in the Laplace representation, then Ohm's law becomes:

        V = (R) i + (1/(s C)) i + (s L) i

        This "memristor" is actually a function of the history of the electric flux going through the circuit:

        V = M(q(t)) i, where M is the memristance
        M(q(t)) = d Phi(t) / d q, where q is the electric charge particle
        Phi = electric flux = integral of electric field E over an area A
    • Capacitors don't provide voltage, they resist a change in it. Ditto for inductors & amperage. Although I'll agree it's not the fourth element - it would be the fifth. A NP junction in its various forms would be the fourth.
    • by dfedfe (980539) on Wednesday April 30 2008, @06:03PM (#23257666)
      Figure 1 in the paper explains it. The four fundamental circuit variables are current, voltage, charge, and magnetic flux. There are six ways of choosing two of these four, which correspond to differential equations relating the variables. Two of them are "given" in that charge is the time integral of current and magnetic flux the time integral of voltage: dq = idt. dphi = vdt.

      As for the others, they are components. For instance, a resistor R fits in dv = Rdi. A capacitor C fits in as dq = Cdv. An inductor as dphi = Ldi, and a memristor fills in the missing dphi = Mdq.

      • Ah, well that makes sense then.
        • by Orne (144925) on Thursday May 01 2008, @10:21AM (#23263698) Homepage
          Is there an equivalent memristor for the mechanical world, e.g. mass, spring, dashpot, xxx?

          Maybe a Thixotropic [wikipedia.org] object like the viscocity of ketchup? It is an object that changes its resistance to flow over time with repect to the force of the flow that was previously applied.

          The more force you apply to ketchup, the easier it is to pour. A memristor would be like the more electric flux you apply through the area of the device, the more/less resistance current will flow through the device.

          -- Scott
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      The only thing covered by Ohm's Law is the resistor, that being the "R" in V = iR.

      For capacitors the equivalent law is i = C (dV/dt), and for inductors it's V = L (di/dt).

      You can combine them all for an RLC circuit, but the result isn't Ohm's law.

       
  • This sounds like a great advance. However, computers that don't need to be booted or that boot instantaneously is not new.

    TRS-80 Color Computer, for example boots instantly since it runs from ROM unless you are using OS-9.

    The TRS-80 Model 100 keeps its file system in RAM and has a separate NiCD to backup the RAM. It boots instantly. The backup lasts months in my experience (even today with old NiCd's).

    And any computer can simply be left on... no boot time.

    So there's nothing here that cannot be done with a m
  • Based on the comments above me I'm not the only one who picked up less than nothing from the article...What is it and how does it work? This is less detailed than a Star Trek Particle description.
    • Article [nature.com] and commentary [nature.com] at Nature. (I'm not sure whether either or both are subscription-only.)

      The bizarre characterization of this as a discovery instead of an invention originates in the paper itself.

  • Does this mean I will eventually not be able to use "try rebooting the system" (to try and solve a problem)? In all seriousness, I think this will make us rethink our problem-solving approach. Powering-off is a great way to "wipe the slate clean" as it were.

    Would this also inspire new forms of malware/viruses/trojans that persist in memory even after the system is powered off?

    And another thing... forensic computer evidence. I guess you could sort of tell what the user was last doing before they turned off t
    • Doesn't matter.

      If memory is settable -- and that is certainly a requirement -- then it's possible to set it all to zero at the flick of a switch. Hence, rebooting.

      Also: it's possible to recover the state of current RAM a surprising amount of time after the user switched off the machine. (Well, okay, tens of seconds, at least).

      I suppose if it became a problem you could always encrypt it on powerdown...

  • An engineer, a physicist and a mathematician are staying in a hotel.
    The engineer wakes up and smells smoke. He goes out into the hallway and sees a fire, so he fills a trash can from his room with water and douses the fire. He goes back to bed.
    Later, the physicist wakes up and smells smoke. He opens his door and sees a fire in the hallway. He walks down the hall to a fire hose and after calculating the flame velocity, distance, water pressure, trajectory, etc. extinguishes the fire with the minimum amount of water and energy needed.
    Later, the mathematician wakes up and smells smoke. He goes to the hall, sees the fire and then the fire hose. He thinks for a moment and then exclaims, "Ah, a solution exists!" and then goes back to bed.
  • by Chris Burke (6130) on Wednesday April 30 2008, @05:46PM (#23257468) Homepage
    I don't understand what makes it a "fundamental" part of a circuit, while say a diode or MOSFET isn't. You can't make a transistor out of resistors, capacitors, and inductors... That's why it always showed up as the magical "voltage-controlled current source" in entry-level circuit analysis courses. I thought the three classic "basic" elements were because they were just the simplest.

    Or maybe they're "basic" because every circuit (that's not superconducting), whether or not it contains semiconductors or more exotic stuff, has some amount resistance, capacitance, and inductance. Even if you don't want it, in which case you call it "parasitic". I don't think you're going to accidentally create two separate layers of titanium oxide.

    So while I get why this discovery is totally awesome, I don't get what they mean by "fourth fundamental circuit element". Anyone got the skinny?
    • by moosesocks (264553) on Wednesday April 30 2008, @06:39PM (#23258046) Homepage
      This one took quite a bit of thinking, although this wikipedia article [wikipedia.org] summarizes it best.

      A transistor may be approximated as a variable current source. Similarly, many applications of transistors are as "active" devices, which supply external power to the circuit being considered.

      A diode is effectively nothing more than a voltage-controlled switch. In a DC circuit, it simply passes current through (with a small voltage drop that can be approximated by an inline negative voltage source).

      Likewise, all transistors can be abstractly considered as networks of diodes. This is why they are inherently binary devices, and why computers "think" in binary.

      The classical circuit elements (Resistor, Capacitor, Inductor) each fundamentally affect the electromagnetic properties of the electrons flowing through said circuit.

      Resistors impede the flow of current; a capacitor is a current "bucket" that also blocks DC signals in AC circuits; and an inductor builds up a sort of inertia for the flow of current, through the creation of a magnetic field.

      The distinction is hazy, but I think I can see it where it comes from.... when a diode/transistor does something, it affects of the "layout" of the circuit, rather than directly affecting the electrons flowing through it.

      The memristor is extremely interesting, as it blurs the line between analogue components and solid-state devices, and provides exciting possibilities for the development of analogue computing and data storage.

      Even more exciting is that they can already be made smaller than transistors, and two can be combined to create a device that functions analogous to a transistor.

      Considering that we're quickly approaching the limits of Silicon-based technology, this invention may very well offer the key to the true "next generation" of electronic devices, and may very well be as significant to our generation as the transistor was to the previous. This is Nobel Prize-worthy stuff we're talking about.

      Kudos to HP for supporting "true" R&D. They most definitely will be reaping the benefits of this one for years to come.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 30 2008, @06:54PM (#23258198)
      I don't get what they mean by "fourth fundamental circuit element"

      There are four fundamental circuit variables; current, voltage, charge, and flux.

      We can define the relationships between charge and current and between flux and voltage. (charge as an integral of current, flux as an integral of voltage over time)

      A resistor provides a function to relate voltage and current.
      A capacitor provides a function to relate charge and voltage.
      An inductor provides a function to relate flux and current.

      Until now we did not know how to construct a passive device which would provide a function relating charge and flux. The only remaining combination of these fundamental variables.
      • by whoever57 (658626) on Wednesday April 30 2008, @07:27PM (#23258458) Journal

        between flux and voltage. (charge as an integral of current, flux as an integral of voltage over time)
        According to EETimes, flux is "change in voltage", [eetimes.com]rather than an intergral. From the article:

        The hold-up over the last 37 years, according to professor Chua, has been a misconception that has pervaded electronic circuit theory. That misconception is that the fundamental relationship in passive circuitry is between voltage and charge. What the researchers contend is that the fundamental relationship is actually between changes-in-voltage, or flux, and charge.
  • I've just invented the memristor!

    Another grand name from the creator of the finglonger.
  • Repeat after me: the researchers constructed a membristor.

    Somehow, I don't think these scientists really care about the abstract existence of memristors. Moreover, you can't prove the existence of something that didn't exist before you started. You might be able to proved the feasibility of such devices, but only in mathematics it may be appropriate to say you "proved the existence" of something when you actually have a construction.
  • by Tumbleweed (3706) * on Wednesday April 30 2008, @05:49PM (#23257500) Homepage
    and then we'll have Leeloo and her multi-pass! Totally cannot wait...
  • So there you have it - the four fundamental elements are now earth, air, fire, and memristor. We never really wanted water in our computers anyway, so it's good to eliminate it (and don't even think about water cooling your systems - that's sacrilege).
  • http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn13812-engineers-find-missing-link-of-electronics.html

    This is very interesting stuff. I wonder if these will ever be produced for amateur use, or if they'll only ever find their way into DRAM and such..
  • The possible uses outlined in the article inspire the imagination, but for my money, a technology that remembers everything presents a privacy risk too extreme to contemplate.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Good: You're trying to recognize privacy problems.

      Bad: You apparently don't understand the problem well enough to differentiate problems from non-problems.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memristor [wikipedia.org]

    You'd think the article would link to it.

  • PROM's, EPROM's, EEPROM's, FLASH, etc., have been around for a very long time. Is this "memresistor" different/better because it's denser and cheaper to manufacturer? Unless I missed it, the article never cites any advantage over existing non-volatile memory technologies.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Practical use, probably 15 to 20 years.

      Insanely expensive prototypes with virtually no functionality in modern use, probably 4 to 10 years.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Why do you think it will be such a long time?

        IBM discovered GMR and that was nearly universally used in hard drives within ten years.
        • got the wrong episode. [wikipedia.org]
        • analog memory (Score:5, Informative)

          by mo (2873) on Wednesday April 30 2008, @07:07PM (#23258306)
          The difference between a memristor and FeRAM is that because the memristor is constructed without using any transistors, it can be used as a kind of analog memory. Instead of just storing 1's and 0's, it's resistance is an analog value anywhere in the range of on and off. Of course you can still use it to store digital data, but the real fun will come when you interconnect these things to emulate the analog behavior of the brain. This is where the claim of pattern recognition and facial recognition come in. They're not actually talking about software there but the actual analog capabilities of circuitry built with memristors.

          The other amazing thing about memristors is how small they are. The articles state that you can emulate a transistor by connecting a few memristors, and that transistor is smaller than any we have today. Also it states that the memristor actually performs better at smaller sizes. This really is neat stuff.
            • by A beautiful mind (821714) on Wednesday April 30 2008, @07:59PM (#23258686)
              Exactly! After reading the few articles, wikipedia and the available information from HP, it looks more like a generational change in technology rather than just a new kind of memory. I think the Nature article's wording of discovery is correct here, this looks like an interesting piece of base research with large real world applications, instead of a specific invention to store things.

              Given that this memristor looks like to be using very little power, can be scaled down very well and can be used both as storage and to build transistors - I'm pretty excited about this. Yeah, there are other attempts at non-volatile ram, but they are either slow (flash), cannot be written to many times (flash), expensive (a lot of flash alternatives) or just simply too energy consuming, the memristors should bring in some nice competition into the field, since the articles specifically state that it doesn't generate much heat at all, compared to currently existing other technologies, it can be made to change state faster than they could measure(!) in the lab and it can be repeated many times. So, the only part that is left is whether it is economically feasible to mass-produce these. I'm guessing it shouldn't be a very large problem either given the relative simplicity of this discovery.
            • Re:Leakage Current? (Score:4, Informative)

              by The_Wilschon (782534) on Wednesday April 30 2008, @09:23PM (#23259266) Homepage
              Closer to 200 atoms wide. Take a glance at http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/sili2.html [gsu.edu] and notice the arrangement of the crystal (face-centered cubic) and the cube size. Going along one face, we pass two atoms before reaching the other side (one corner and one face center), so we have two atoms per 0.5 nm. Now chips are being mass produced on a 45 nm scale. This is about 100 times the silicon crystal cube size, with two atoms linearly per cube.
              • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

                To extend what you said, there are two problems we're seeing with current transistor technology.

                Most inexpensive chip processes involve using blue and UV light to effectively (with chemical baths and deposition treatments) etch the surface of the chip into the correct shape and size. The biggest limitation here is that the light is around 300nm. When you're working significantly smaller than that, etching with this light is not as effective. Using higher frequency light can break down the materials (bath
                    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

                      I think where you're really going astray is in assuming that a system which doesn't typically need to perform a full reboot would somehow be incapable of doing so; you even imply OS developers might forget that's a requirement, which is a huge insult to every OS developer. Having a system be able to boot itself from a clean slate (as it would have to for a new install, replacement of memristor-RAM sticks etc.) is not only a blindingly obvious requirement, but code that would be required anyway to boot the

          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            Well, for starters, a transistor has a base, an emitter and a collector. A current flows from the base to the emitter which also lets another current flow from the collector to the emitter.

            A memristor only varies the resistivity from one of the wires, which effectively isolates the two circuits. This cannot be effectively be achieved with resistors, capacitors, or inductors. So, the memristor is actually a "resistivity transistor", which happens to have memory included.

            A practical application for this would
            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              Well, for starters, a transistor has a base, an emitter and a collector. A current flows from the base to the emitter which also lets another current flow from the collector to the emitter.

              You have described a bipolar transistor. However, with field effect transistors, there is no current between the gate (base) and the source/drain (collector/emitter). In the case of a bipolar transistor, the emitter/collector current is controlled by the base/emitter current, whereas the source/drain current of a FET is
    • by ettlz (639203) on Wednesday April 30 2008, @05:38PM (#23257354) Homepage Journal
      In about 200 years' time, when Evil returns.
    • This article on wired's site talks about that: http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/04/scientists-prov.html [wired.com]

      In short - it's going to be a while

    • It is easy to make a whole lot of might and could style predictions for some discovery that works in a controlled lab environment, but it is a lot harder to deliver them in product form: reliable enough and low cost enough to be useful. The tecno development hiway is littered with technologies such as bubble memory that just never worked out.

      We've had Non-volatile state storage for ages (eg. FeRAM and floating gates (as used in flash) and battery backed up RAM). State storage is only part of the picture.

      W