Slashdot Log In
New Font Uses Holes To Cut Ink Use
Posted by
timothy
on Wed Dec 17, 2008 04:38 PM
from the more-you-take-away dept.
from the more-you-take-away dept.
An anonymous reader writes "A Dutch company has taken an open source Sans Serif font and
added holes to it to try and save on printer ink costs. The Ecofont is claimed to save up to 20 percent of ink costs, but it allegedly took the firm a while to perfect the ratio of the maximum number of holes possible without sacrificing readability."
Related Stories
Submission: New font uses holes to cut ink use by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Practicality? (Score:5, Interesting)
Looks interesting, but probably not very practical. Surely simply printing in draft mode and in grey-scale is an easier way? On screen this is probably going to be more headache than its worth.
Re:Practicality? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm waiting for the serif version of that font; there they'll replace the serifs with spoilers. I also think they will add a special Type-R sticker glyph in a Unicode Private Use Area to make it go even faster. Then the only thing that could possibly beat the font would be drift typing - but everyone knows that technique can be handled only by the most extreme Japanese fonts.
Parent
Woohoo! (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Practicality? (Score:5, Insightful)
Ahhh... so, bonus points for @media print{body{font-family:Spranq Eco Sans;}}?
Parent
This is pointless (Score:5, Informative)
These people don't seem aware that typefaces are usually available in many weights.
You can save much more than this by simply changing to a lighter weight. [fontshop.com]
(I am a typographer. But it shouldn't take one to figure this out.)
Re:This is pointless (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:This is pointless (Score:5, Insightful)
Yea, Light is so last century. It's all about the Eco now.
Parent
Re:This is pointless (Score:5, Funny)
So "green" is the new "pink" and "eco" is the new "black"? Or is "black" the new "light"? I'm so confused.
You are so dead at the next zebra crossing.
Parent
Re:This is pointless (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes but lighter weights either make the font thinner and harder to read, When it prints it uses a dithering option to get the lightness sometimes giving it a choppy edge to it. This font makes sure the edges are solid allowing you to more clearly read the font.
Parent
Re:This is pointless (Score:5, Funny)
Shouldn't they have done this with a serif font if it is meant to save ink/toner?
They started with a serif font. What's left is sans serif.
Parent
Re:This is pointless (Score:5, Insightful)
What I meant is, they seem to have modified a screen font. If you are trying to save toner/ink, I would think that choosing a printed font would be more effective.
I know that you CAN print a sans-serif font, but I thought that the rule of thumb was that serif fonts should be used for print.
That said, I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about - thus why I asked the question :)
Parent
Re:This is pointless (Score:5, Funny)
That said, I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about
Don't worry, it doesn't show.
Parent
Mod parent down! (Score:5, Funny)
Really, guys. I'm not that funny.
Parent
Re:Mod parent down! (Score:5, Funny)
Ironically, it was, then somebody modded it down.
Parent
Re:This is pointless (Score:5, Interesting)
Newspapers are ususally more concerned with legibility than readability: how much can we pack on a page and still have the reader make it out at all, not how fatigued the reader is after reading hundreds of pages. Maybe you're an exception, but on the whole newpaper fonts tend to be different from book fonts in just that optimization choice.
If you have studies that show you can pack text as densely on the page with sans-serif fonts as serif, I'd believe that. The legibility advantage of serif fonts was largely in the redundancy provided in case part of a letter broke off in the press - hardly a concern with modern equipment.
But for reading a book's worth of text, serif fonts win hands down. I *hate* technical books where some asshole thought it would be clever to use a sans-serif font to show how technical the book was - as I grow older, this sort of thing causes me physical pain. The changing of the default Word font from serif to sans will be a source of annoyance for years to come, and no doubt cause me to toss that many more resumes on the "ow, my eyes!" pile.
Parent
Horrible (Score:5, Insightful)
At big sizes the holes make it look horrible. At small sizes it's not all that readable as far as fonts go.
You might as well print at 80% grey instead of black to get the same savings and have it look better.
Re:Horrible (Score:5, Insightful)
From the website:
View the Ecofont
In the picture you can see how the Ecofont is created by omitting parts of the letter. At the shown size, this obviously is not very nice, but at a regular font size it is actually very usable.
It must look pretty horrible at smaller sizes too otherwise I think they might have shown us a sample, no?
If they'd constructed it out of Sierpinski gasket they would have saved a lot more!
Nice bit of viral marketing for Spranq methinks.
Parent
Unfortunately (Score:5, Funny)
I'm willing to make that sacrifice if it means saving Mother Earth!
Not just for saving ink (Score:5, Funny)
Just imagine how many electrons could be saved if people used this font in their browser.
Re:Not just for saving ink (Score:5, Funny)
Just imagine how many electrons could be saved if people used this font in their browser.
I always recycle my electrons.
Parent
Re:Not just for saving ink (Score:5, Funny)
On an LCD, you should use a dark theme in the winter so that the dark pixels soak up the extra backlight photons and convert them into heat. In the summer, go with a lighter theme that will let all of the photons out before they have a chance to run up your AC bill. Oh, and make sure you set the monitor up near a window so the extra photons can just keep right on going.
Parent
Re:Not just for saving ink (Score:5, Funny)
You got green? Mine is black text on a black background. I have to guess what everybody is saying.
Parent
Re:Not just for saving ink (Score:5, Funny)
Bonus tip: if you put everything in quote tags, it saves on black electrons.
Parent
This is the printer's job. (Score:4, Interesting)
The 'economy mode' on my rather old laser printer basically does this. It just sort of prints letter outlines instead of the full letter. Ecofont's solution seems like... leaky abstraction? The print-saving settings are now embedded into a document rather than determined at print time. Sounds like a terrible idea for a problem that's already been solved.
But how much e-ink (Score:5, Funny)
will it save while I view documents on my ereader?
Dot Matrix Draft (Score:5, Funny)
I prefer to use Inverted Ecofont, in which everything else is removed and only the holes remain. This saves 80% of the ink, and it known to some people as "dot-matrix draft mode".
This is new font is stupid and not news.
Coming soon... (Score:5, Funny)
The eco-boat.
A day in the font (Score:5, Funny)
I read Slashdot today, oh boy
Four thousand holes in ecofont sans serif
And though the holes were very small
They had to count them all
Now they know how many holes it takes to fill "the Albert Hall"
I'd love to turn you on
They're a marcomms company: this is a stunt (Score:5, Insightful)
Sigh. As the various outraged typographers here attest, this is a self-promotional stunt and has nothing to do with innovation or even typography. The clue is the first line of TFA:
"Dutch marketing and communications company Spranq has come up with a novel and free way of slashing printer ink costs by developing a font with holes in it."
I work for a marcomms agency as well. This is how such agencies get clients: you pull stunts like this to make yourselves look like gurus in some way, so when you go in for pitches you have lots of press clippings (clients don't read them, they just look at where they were published) so you have some kind of differentiation over your rivals. I worked for a place where we made a big fanfare about recruiting an "artist in residence" (and got lots of press) - others in our space have launched "labs" or various kinds, etc. etc.
There's no substance in any of it. It's all just a marketing con-job and sad to say Slashdot has fallen for it (not that a marcomms agency's clients would be interested in a /. story anyway).
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Funny)
I agree. Their idea is redundant as most letters come pre-made with holes in them.
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Insightful)
I have a way to save 100%. Don't print it!
Parent
I agree many things don't need to be printed (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed (Score:5, Informative)
12 point font means the font's vertical size is 12/72in = 1/6th of an inch.
Keeping a constant aspect ratio, the ink savings would be (12*12-10*10)/12*12 = 30.56%
For 20%, sqrt(.8)*12 = 10.73pt font. He was underestimating! ... and yet, no one cares....
Parent
Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed (Score:5, Funny)
Or modify English spellings to conform with those used by 13 y/ olds in their text messages.
u cn save ink n papr 2 !
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Funny)
Since there are printing costs overruns, I suggested we should charge people by the number of pages not picked up at the end of the month. My suggestion was quickly shot down. I'll never make it into management.
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Informative)
Paper trees are always re-planted after being cut down (it would get unsustainable very quickly if this didn't happen) - and generally also have a lot of recycled material in the final product. The tree-cutting damage comes from the food industry clearing the way for beef cows or corn crops.
Never mind how insanely expensive ink is. The wasted ink is by far worse than the wasted paper. If you want to save a few sheets, shrink your print margins; either way, there's really no net gain or loss in trees.
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Insightful)
First of all, the idea that everything required for the class should be included in the price of the class is ridiculous. Books aren't included. Neither are pens, paper, or laptops.
Second, what difference does it make whether you pay for your printing at the printer or in your tuition? Theoretically speaking, if nobody abused their printing privileges, the cost would average out and the cost to you would be the same either way.
However, if charging three cents at the printer reduces abuse, then you, as a student, actually save money. Even if you're one of the students that's abusing your printing privileges, you'd still save money because you don't have to pay for all the other students that are abusing their privileges. Putting all the cost in the tuition causes the tragedy of the commons. [wikipedia.org]
My college actually charged nine cents per page; it was really no big deal. Although I'm curious if the GP meant three cents per page, or three cents per job. If it's per page, the 70% drop doesn't surprise me too much, but if it's per job, then that's pretty amazing.
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Funny)
Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Unfortunately, since you don't take ink seriously, I'm guessing you are spending too much printing your newsletter and will be out of business shortly.
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Informative)
Deforestation is almost exclusively the result of agricultural expansion. It makes no sense to say that saving paper = saving forests.
Here is what Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] has to say about the matter:
Even when deforestation is the result of lumber harvesting activities, it is primarily because the roads used to access the lumber make it easier for farmers to move in and use the land.
While forest area is on the decline in the US, it is due to urbanization, not timber harvesting activities (the same article discusses this).
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Insightful)
Mod parent interesting, insightful, and informative.
It seems counter-intuitive, but if we stopped using wood completely, then forested land would no longer be profitable! If that happened, people would just replace the forested land with something that is profitable, like housing developments or farms.
I agree that deforestation is a big problem, particularly in third-world countries, but reducing paper use could reduce reforestation, which would cause more harm than good.
I think it's more important that we focus on passing laws to protect natural habitats; when forced to, logging companies have no problems making the most with the land they own.
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't know for you but for me 99.9% of the paper I consumed won't be readable in a year, because I will have thrown it away.
Text-files? I'm sure they will.
PDF? No idea.
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Funny)
ask me how!
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Funny)
f u cn rd ths u cn
I blushed when I read this: "fxxx xxu cxnx, rxdx thxs xxu cxnx"
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:What a fucking stupid idea! (Score:5, Insightful)
I have a much better one, change the quality settings in the printing dialog. There you have it ..
I doubt it will be less readable than that crap and it will also work for all fonts and images and so on ..
Parent
Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies (Score:5, Funny)
Poke holes in the cookies before serving. The cookies are now 20% healthier!
Parent
Re:Horrible on screen (Score:5, Informative)
I printed off a quick test to an HP LaserJet 4100 from Word 2007 in WinXP, and it looks a lot better in print than on screen. 10 & 11 point being where it looks best. You can still see the holes, but they're not as glaringly obvious or jagged as when displayed on screen.
Parent