Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Abit To Bow Out of Mainboard Market

Posted by timothy on Thu Aug 28, 2008 01:49 PM
from the market-dynamics dept.
Steve Kerrison writes "Taiwanese technology firm Abit will be pulling out of the mainboard market at the end of this year. HEXUS.channel, citing sources close to South East Asian distributors, reports that the company will continue to deliver mainboard products until the end of 2008 and will still honour all warranties in subsequent years. Rumours of this decision circulated in May but were dismissed. Apparently the decision was made in the last couple of weeks. Abit is a popular brand amongst PC hardware enthusiasts, many of whom will be disappointed to see it leave the market."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Abit To Close Its Doors Forever On Dec. 31, 2008 195 comments
ki1obyte writes "Earlier this year the Taiwanese firm Abit, once a leading-edge maker of computer mainboards and other components, was slated to shut down motherboard production by the end of 2008 and focus on consumer electronics devices. Now X-bit labs reports that Abit will cease to exist entirely after midnight on the last day of 2008 because the owner of the brand, Universal Scientific Industrial, is in the process of restructuring and cutting their costs."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • RIP (Score:4, Interesting)

    by everphilski (877346) on Thursday August 28 2008, @01:53PM (#24783071) Journal
    I think I'll fire up my dual processor 366 MHz BP-6 [bp6.com] for old times' sake.
  • Capacitors (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Ark42 (522144) <slashdot@morpheussoftwar e . n et> on Thursday August 28 2008, @01:55PM (#24783099) Homepage

    Abit was the only brand of motherboards I knew of that acknowledged the capacitors problem and claimed to use 100% known-good Japanese caps in their boards. With them gone, does that leave any good companies, or will all motherboards still be doomed to leaky budging and exploding capacitors?

    • Wow, didn't see you post that before my tirade, but, when it comes to bad caps, Abit is just as guilty as anyone else. I have the boards to prove it.

      • and you can send them in and they will replace them .. either the whole board or the caps..

        • They refused to fix or replace my KT7 back in the day after too many caps had finally blown.

          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            i'm very supprised.. all of the boards we had with bad caps they replaced with no questions.

            at first they didn't but after about 2 months of them being out and they made the public acknowlagement - they replaced them

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Yeah, Abit *was* just as guilty, when the problem was first noticed, but they admitted there was a problem, and took a stance of Japanese-only caps later on. Newer boards from Asus and Epox have STILL had bad caps as recently as a year ago, while Abit boards no longer have any problems. This is from my limited experience with all my relatives and friends that I buy parts for and/or fix computers for.

    • I hardly think this a problem any more.

      My MSI K9N neo has all solid caps, and thankfully it seems many boards are going this way, filtering in from the high end down.

    • Abit was the only brand of motherboards I knew of that acknowledged the capacitors problem and claimed to use 100% known-good Japanese caps in their boards. With them gone, does that leave any good companies, or will all motherboards still be doomed to leaky budging and exploding capacitors?

      Can you please explain when this started happening? Cause unless this is a recent development, and if you would like to pay shipping, I can offer you a motherboard that says otherwise.

      • Indeed, I'm intrigued also as I've yet to have any problem with capacitors on my various motherboards through the ages.

        I know at work there was a dodgy batch of MSI motherboards with capacitors that blew but it was literally just a single batch.

    • Giga-Byte

        • What is wrong with Abit? We've used them in the shop for our budget boards for ages and never had a problem. My SG80 is purring like a kitten,running so good in fact I'm picking up a P4 3.4GHz just so I can finally say I've upgraded it as far as it could go(within reason). But we never had any problems with the caps,or those weird driver issues that'll drive you nuts. In fact we've had more trouble out of those cheapy "consumer special" Dell and Compaqs than we ever had out of Abit.

          It is just a shame I w

    • I was a big Abit fan until I had to return a faulty motherboard to NewEgg. Purchasing items online leaves no tolerance for that sort of thing.

      Ever since then, I've only bought Asus boards, and I've been completely satisfied.

      • I was a big Abit fan until I had to return a faulty motherboard to NewEgg. Purchasing items online leaves no tolerance for that sort of thing.

        Uhh, components fail. Having one failure is hardly a statistically significant sample. It could have been Asus, it could have been Intel, it could have been anyone.

        • I have a zero tolerance policy.

          Anyway, a lot of other people had the same problem with that board.

          • I have a zero tolerance policy.

            And that makes no sense as it does not take into account how hardware fails and plain old statistics.

            • So if I buy a product that sucks, I'm supposed to say, "Well gee, this could have happened to any company. I will give them a second chance."

              Companies aren't all that compassionate, why should consumers be?

              • So if I buy a product that sucks, I'm supposed to say, "Well gee, this could have happened to any company. I will give them a second chance."

                "Sucks" is a very subjective term. There's a difference between you making a subjective decision that "this product isn't for me" and saying under the guise of objectivity that "this product failed so it must suck."

                • Well, shit, I give up!

                  I'll continue on doing what works for me. Maybe you should buy two items from every vendor that sells me one faulty one, just to even out this grave injustice.

            • I have a zero tolerance problem with companies that choose to make it hard to fix/repair their defective shit: ECS, I'm looking at you!

              Dodgy manufacturers shift support responsibility onto retailers, but when those retailers are horrible (not newegg, thank the godz), they refuse to pony up and support you.

              Promise... now you are amazing, yes, I had to give you my credit card number before you'd cross-ship the warranty replacement, but you did, and it only cost me shipping.

              ECS, you morons left me with no alt
          • Receiving a bad part is good evidence of a faulty manufacturing process around the time of purchase, but maybe they had improved after that? Even great manufacturers go through bad patches : IBM (disks), Sony, Apple, etc. Usually the situation corrects itself or the company doesn't stay in business.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Many of the motherboard makers including Gigibyte and Asus have switched to using OSCON style solid electrolytic capacitors which do not suffer from the same problems that normal aluminum electrolytic capacitors do. While they like to brag about how noble this makes them, I suspect the real reason is that it just became more economical because of the increasingly stringent requirements for the processor's voltage regulator. In designs where the capacitors' equivalent series inductance and resistance have

  • As I was when my KG7 and KT7 both quit last month with bad caps. To heck with ABIT!

  • Good night, sweet prince, And packs of capacitors sing thee to thy rest.
  • Given the generally good quality of Abit main/motherboards, and the fact that they were reasonably priced: will the loss of their competition raise the price of their competitors? Or is the market broad enough this won't impact the price points? (I would place them in the same field as Asus / ASrock / MSI / BIOSTAR / Foxconn / etc.)

    Either way. It is a loss.

    • My experiences of abit boards are nothing less of horrible. For example the AB9 Pro motherboard's bios didn't use ACHI or left a whole sata-controller uninitialized depending on the version.

      So good riddance, where can I get my lost hair back?

  • by BitterOldGUy (1330491) on Thursday August 28 2008, @02:12PM (#24783345)

    It looks like the margins have become too tight for all but the largest mainboard makers to survive, with massive companies like Foxconn able to exploit extreme economies of scale.

    Which is exactly what the TV industry went through. Even the big players left and licensed their names to Chinese companies. Do you really think the Sony TV is really a Sony? Or RCA or GE .... It's just a commodity.

    The margins are just too low to even bother with them.

    • Sony still makes their own screens. RCA is owned by the Chinese now. I'm pretty sure you're right about GE though.
    • Sony doesn't license their name out, though they do have other companies make many of their products and components for them, then Sony sells those products under their own name. I think Toshiba rebadges someone else's TV with their branding for at least some models.

      Westinghouse is another one of those names that was licensed to some other company to make TVs and computer monitors.

      • You do know that there is still a motherboard in notebooks right? It is different but it is still there.

        • Yea, but in five years you'll have System-on-Chip with Infiniband hubs to your external peripherals.

          Motherboards will be things of the past.
  • I think Abit is the manufacturer of my girlfriend's computer who's motherboard just died. It better be coincidence only!
  • I remember getting the Abit BH-6 and the Celeron 300A which easily took to overclocking @ 450mhz.

    Most stable, rock solid board I've ever owned.

    RIP.

    • I had one of the first ABIT soft-set motherboards (I put an AMD K6-200 in there to give you the vintage) - to be honest it was a piece of crap. It frequently forgot the settings and forced you to go into the bios.

      I got it replaced because it died one day, and the one that replaced it wasn't much better.

      Sadly - last abit board I ever had.

    • I had one of those and it was wonderful. It was really cool to have more-or-less the fastest computer that any of us had ever seen back in high school, to impress all of my other nerd friends. I was even able to overclock it to 504mhz for a bit, but it was a little unstable.

  • My motherboard was never great to begin with, but they haven't released new drivers or a bios update in over 2 years, and the board has only been out for 3. This means the motherboard doesn't support more than 2.5GB of ram even though it can theoretically support 8GB, and is one of the reasons I'm not running Vista right now. Abit seemed to go way down hill after socket AM2 and 754 came out.

    Then again, with board manufacturers all over the place (Palit, Zotac, Asus, Intel, Foxconn, ECS *shudder*, Gigabyte
  • Abit is a popular brand amongst PC hardware enthusiasts, many of who will be disappointed to see it leave the market.

    In the late 90s and early 00s maybe. They've been more of a problem-child as of late. Frankly, I thought they were already out of the market.

  • First VIA drops Chipsets, and now Abit drops boards. Couldn't happen to a better MB manufacturer.

    Worst board I ever owned was an Abit KT7A. To this day I'm convinced that Abit Golden Sampled the reviews of that board.

    My KT7A was blue screen after Kernel Panic after lockup, And half the time, it would corrupt the drive even though it would pass every hard drive, Processor and Memory test known to man. Abit Finally put out a BIOS that removed the suck from it, but it was pretty much EOL when it came out and c

  • they had good support and a good product so let's hope they still have a foot in the market. UMPs might be a good place for them to shine again.

    LoB

    • I'm still using an IC7 (dash nothing) and it has been working very well until the last few months with a minor issue. This is the longest that I've ever used the same PC (five years). I disconnected the motherboard fan due to noise within the first year and never had any problems. Now the only issue that I have is that I have to hold its hand while rebooting. It often freezes at the initiation screen. Simply resetting it gets it to properly boot. Before that I only used Abit boards and built about 25
    • you're on crack. IN9 32X-Max board was a dismal failure in terms of product quality and actual function. Certain high level Abit officials have already made comments suggesting that they knew the boards didn't work when they sold them. Abit RMA'd most of their production runs from that model. Though most of the blame lays on nvidia for a crappy chipset and faulty memory controller design, the real blame lays on the company who wrote the BIOS software and the company who sold it to me.

        • I can't cite, it was a conversation I had with one of them. Not allowed to let that cat out of the bag.

      • VIA is more likely to be moving to System on a Chip setups. I don't see them getting out of the ITX business anytime soon.