Slashdot Log In
Can REDFLY sell in an EeePC market?
Posted by
Zonk
on Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:01 PM
from the how-it-feels-to-be-a-fembot-living-in-a-manbot's-manputer's-world dept.
from the how-it-feels-to-be-a-fembot-living-in-a-manbot's-manputer's-world dept.
palmsolo (aka Matthew Miller) writes "I was lucky enough to get a chance to evaluate an early beta of the REDFLY device and just posted some initial impressions at ZDNet. As a person who commutes on the train 2 hours every day and usually always has a Windows Mobile device in tow, this is actually a perfect device for me; real productivity is possible with text entry and enjoy surfing on a larger display. However, at $500 can this device really compete in the Asus EeePC market or will it die like the Palm Foleo?"
Related Stories
[+]
Linux: Stalwarts Claim Asus eeePC Violates GPL 247 comments
WirePosted writes "Members of the Linux community have complained that the hot new sub-notebook from Asus, the eeePC, may have violated the spirit of the Linux General Public License (GPL). Some Linux advocates claim the eeePC has not included required source code with the installed Xandros Linux distribution and does not easily enable users to install another distro. However, there are indications that eeePC fans probably don't care."
Submission: Can REDFLY sell in an EeePC market? by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
well (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Complacency does that to you...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:well (Score:5, Informative)
I think it has more to do with a lack of updates from Palm. They effectively stood still for so long that hardware finally reached a point where WinCE could be run at a reasonable speed. When device makers looked at the (non-existent) multimedia features of PalmOS and the (competent) multimedia features of WinCE, they chose WinCE almost by default.
Now if Cobalt had been pushed out the door, maybe things would have been different. But instead, Cobalt sits on the shelf with not a single device maker using it. Not even Palm hardware.
Parent
Yep (Score:5, Interesting)
So sure, when Windows CE first came out, I can see how Palm thought it was laughable because it was. The problem comes from assuming that is all MS will ever put out. Well, no. With each version they learned more about what they needed to do. Pretty soon CE had surpassed PalmOS and Palm was scrambling to catch up.
In business in general you can't just sit stagnant and assume nobody will surpass you, but when MS enters the market that is particularly true. They have numerous times released a product that was quite poor in its first version, only to continue to refine it to the point that it surpasses it's competition.
Parent
Re:well (Score:5, Interesting)
It was never the case that slow hardware plagued Microsoft's PDA offerings. The problem is that the use-case models (if there were any) for the Pocket PC user interface were absurd. They have a kind of "desktop replacement" mentality; yet to the degree something is convenient to carry in your pocket, it is awkward as a general purpose computing device (with an interface mimicking a desktop no less). And vice versa.
It is the badness of the Windows Mobile interfaces, coupled with the excessive bulk of the early WinCE PDAs that made them crap. It was a cascade of bad consequences, all starting with the attempt to be good at everything: to give a desktop-y kind of experience, you needed lots of pixels, and those pixels had to be color and they had to come cheap, so you ended up with a large device with a big honking battery to drive the backlight through the cheap lcd. It's the hi-res displays and the high capacity batteries that make modern Windows Mobile PDAs tolerable. Not the CPU speed.
Palm, in its heyday, created a niche product that was convenient to carry, and performed in a few limited roles very well. Think about this: that very same description also fits Apple's iPod. Now, there were people like me who exploited the fact that Palm was a platform, and made a nice living off it for a while. We could define new roles for the device.
It is true Palm made some mistakes, but the idea that they failed to make a spiffy enough OS is a myth. The real problem is that the PDA niche became unprofitable as prices dropped. Most who had a Palm V would probably be happy with one today -- if it cost about $35. But that's not the kind of thing Palm sells; they sell stuff in the 200-$500 range. So, they began to add spiffiness to their products, spiffiness that their users neither needed, nor wanted, but was mandated by the price range they wanted to occupy. So they blurred the distinction between PalmOS and PocketPC by becoming more PocketPC like.
In the end, it was not so much a case of Palm moving too slowly, as not having a very good place to move towards, other than into smart phones.
In smart phones, business friendliness continues to be a weak spot for Palm and a marketing strength for Microsoft. But Microsoft isn't as dominant as people here seem to think. It is the carriers rule the smart phone market, not Microsoft. I see the smart phone as only an interim solution, not because PDA functions need to be liberated from a phone, but vice versa. We're in a state of incredible flux at present, with categories of mobile devices multiplying rapidly, and the boundaries of those categories being very fuzzy.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That explains it. (Score:2, Interesting)
Cellular carriers, you mean ATT - that little company that did not want people using 300 baud modems? That would explain everthing about the US market but iPhone. Even iPhone is understandable when you hear about multiple thousand dollar "data" bills.
Re:That explains it. (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Blackberry needs two things and then i'll be out of complaints entirely: 1) HTML email (i mean, c'mon already) 2) improved browser
Neither is a show-stopper. I have a company provided BB...well i have about 7 of them being the Desktop Manager...and use it for my personal cell as wel
Re: (Score:2)
I'm using BBSmart's Email Viewer, and it works pretty well. Worth the $24 IMO. There's another that's only $10, but BBSmart's had good reviews. Annoying to spend $24 on something so simple? Sure. But then again, it's just $24.
I don't have much trouble with the Internet Browser on the BB Curve (8320). It works well enough. My biggest problem is my flakey wifi access point.
The BB Curve is a good device. Now if only there were a decent text editor...
Re:well (Score:4, Insightful)
With the multitude of super-subnotebooks out there that can run a real OS (WinXP, Linux) with real applications that don't require a "host PC" (even my Toshiba Libretto 110CT with 64MB RAM from 1998 has more potential than this pice of junk), and given the eeePC + XP-Home costs the same as this, what is the market for such a machine at this price??? Cut the price in half and it might be worth talking about...
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
It's slow. It crashes frequently. It randomly doesn't work. Like right now - I was taking pictures with it earlier (always a risky proposition) and now it's dead. Gotta hit the reset button and wait until it reboots. If I want to use the brows
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I recently upgraded it from WM5 to WM6 and it's fast, stable and works well. It seems the smartphone edition of WM5 and WM6 works better than the touchscreen enabled version.
I even like it WAY better than the Windows Mobile Treo and palm Treo. It's all in the hardware being designed for the software it runs.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The phone itself is junk but I'm trying to focus primarily on the problems with wind
Re: (Score:2)
The best part is t
Re: (Score:2)
Have a look at the WM5 Treo to see what a quasi-properly set up smartphone should be.
Beavis and Butthead (Score:4, Funny)
If it can run Linux w. Compiz? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:If it can run Linux w. Compiz? (Score:5, Funny)
1. It kills the battery life.
2. It's actually not that useful. No more user friendly than eeeXubuntu is, and, like I said, the decreased batter life prevents it from being that viable.
3. Shininess does not create usability.
4. The Eee is great, can't argue with that.
5. You are a bit too excited about this, and your grammar has suffered. It should be "then you have to pay more than $100 extra," not "then you have to Pay MORE THAN $100!!!"
6. Using more than one exclaimation mark makes people think that you are insane. It makes people pay attention for the same reason that people pay attention to the crazy people on the street - if you don't, they might stab you.
Parent
Seen it, not very impressed (Score:5, Interesting)
Colin Cook (CTO of Celio, makers of Redfly) came to speak to our Information Technology guest lecture class at BYU, so I've seen this thing in action.
I asked them about computers like the EEE PC and there was a definite brief look of worry, then he claimed that people didn't want to carry around a whole extra computer, and that by being able to keep the PDA on your person, the Redfly would be more secure than a laptop which you might leave in a bag or briefcase. He also said that the target customer (Windows PDA users) wouldn't want to buy an EEE PC because it had Linux on it.
He also seemed to get slightly flustered when I informed him that you could buy EEE PCs with Windows on them.
I think that when they started working on this project, there was a need and a market for it, but now that it's almost ready their market has disappeared because functional affordable UMPCs are finally on the market. That said, it was kind of neat, but not $500 neat. Maybe PDA accessory neat($50-$100).
Re:Seen it, not very impressed (Score:4, Funny)
Maybe we can get Barack Obama to do a speech about it.
Parent
Have an eeePC device (Score:4, Interesting)
Plus are you going to sit on a train juggling a display, a keyboard, a mouse, and a PDA.
Touch iPod is cheaper (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't about ideology wars. It's purely pragmatic. I want to do stuff like load Eclipse [eclipse.org] on it, and type code while on the train. Or any other program that I already know from the PC. Even if a PDA sorta-equivalent exists, maybe I can't be arsed to learn it, when I already have a perfectly good program that I'm familiar with.
In that vein, I plan to buy an Eee
Re: (Score:2)
Keyboard and Monitor? (Score:2, Insightful)
No. 'nuff said. (Score:3, Interesting)
Attention EEE PC competitors (Score:5, Insightful)
These convergence devices bug me to a certain point. I turned off my wireless data plan and opted for a plain-jane phone when I realized I never used it enough to justify its cost. So with the few poeple like me that are cheapskates when it comes to a cell phone, you lost a customer if your 'top requires it. What if I just want to use existing free wifi spots or just go offline to whip up some notes or play games?
Let's not add a needless layer of complication to the equation. Pricing it to $100 less than a real laptop is just asking for failure. So if you sell off your cell phone, do you sell off the redfly as well?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm the same way. I've been very tempted lately to purchase a Nokia n810 tablet to use at wifi
Re: (Score:2)
Y'know what I want from a phone? Text and voice. Sure, it's fun to have a camera sometimes and all that, but that's really it. The Eee PC is nice, but a bit too overpriced right now. So making an Eee PC competitor that's wedded to the smartphone market, and does nothing without a smartphone, for about the same price as an Eee PC?
Huh (Score:2)
Apparently just a USB hub, with accessories... (Score:2)
I think... (Score:2, Insightful)
The USB enclosure made nice with my spare DVD drive and let me put XP on my EEE which lets me do work things and have fun with Doom and Quake when I'm waiting at the car shop while my car gets its regular maintenance done.
If you don't have a spare copy of XP like I did then you'd have to fork out another $200 for it. Still.. thats a whole PC for something the size of this dumb terminal (It doesn't
DOA (Score:2)
I may be the only one who has dealt with Microsoft when they promise a vendor big things in order to get a Microsoft-reliant product to market, then mysteriously all of the promises evaporate.
What makes matters worse, is Microsoft's OEM OS business will screw new device makers every time. You bet Microsoft will choose the probable volume of the EEPC versus
Pointless device, poor product targeting (Score:3, Interesting)
Redfly is small-ish, but it's not cheap, and it runs Windows Mobile. That makes it a bastard PDA, and the industry has proven time and time again that PDAs suck, and PDA phones are just bulky overpriced phones with crap features. No love.
At $500, it's within kicking distance of many cheap full-featured laptops from ECS and Acer, even Dell! If you really want to be a road warrior and get some work done on the bus, you don't want an oversized Blackberry, you want a real laptop! With a real keyboard, real apps and 100% compatibility with your existing software investment and infrastructure. The hardware is peanuts these days, it's all about the software.
It's a Trojan (Score:3, Interesting)
Nope! People want full applications (Score:3, Insightful)
Eeepc gives you just that, full blown Linux applications (or Windows if you have to install it).
Powerful PDA's need to run Linux or Windows these days or at least have ports of popular Linux apps.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Or... (Score:5, Informative)
I've seen a number of them out and about - I don't think they can fail by any sane measurement, as they have already succeeded by most.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm thinking more long-term. Sure, the EeePC has sold well so far, but it seems mostly as a novelty. Even among the people I talk to about them they complain about the small disk space, strained eyes with extended use, etc. As other laptops become cheaper and remain far superior to the EeePC, I forsee them quickly dropping away.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe as a more general laptop, but not as the same type of device it is now.
I know I'll get panned for saying it, especially here where it seems many have a love affair with the EeePC, but the device never seemed like a good investment. I guess in a time when people are paying in excess of $350 for an iPod it seems like a good deal, but I tend to value my money a bit more and would much rather pay more for a considerable boost in power and practicality.
Though I will admit: it looks pretty cool. But I thi
Re: (Score:2)
My last trans-atlantic flight I sat by someone with an eee pc an
Re: (Score:2)
By the way, I think it's actually pretty robust, I've dropped my girlfriend's eee twice (I use it because I find my 12" powerbook (!) too big and clunky for actual laptop use), with no ill effects.
Re:Or... (Score:4, Funny)
Or a man-bag, if you're a man -- or a murse, if you're an American man.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Why do you think we are starting to see similar devices?
I think the market was ripe for such a thing, particularly at these price points. I know I "had to have" mine, and for $379USD am loving every minute of it.
Now, Windows mobile could be a nice somewhat lean OS for the thing, and I'd find this REDFLY pretty good if it was a little sleeker and more refined then my eeePC. I would prefer the Linux though because I'm a big L