Slashdot Log In
Microsoft Says Your Phone is Your Next PC
Posted by
samzenpus
on Wed May 16, 2007 06:22 PM
from the the-swiss-army-phone dept.
from the the-swiss-army-phone dept.
eldavojohn writes "While other companies are marrying the obvious functionalities to cell phones (calendar, MP3 player, GPS, etc.), Microsoft is aiming for it to be your next computer. Microsoft Research chief Craig Mundie said that, "Microsoft has a research project called 'Fone+' that would allow the phone to work with a TV as a secondary display, and one that could allow video stored on the device to be played back on the television.""
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Shhhhhh! Everyone be quiet! (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Shhhhhh! Everyone be quiet! (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Shhhhhh! Everyone be quiet! (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I'd put this right up with the recent threats about Linux and patents as press releases that really mean, "Hey, we're making it sound like Vista is doing great, but it's crashing, and we're really scared we might no longer be the big bully on the block. Instead of seeing how desperate we are,
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I presume you didn't read TFA and instead projected your negative preception of Microsoft onto the summary. FYI, that bit of the summary relates to this quote from TFA:
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, you can use a TV to watch videos, if that's all you do with your toys. On the other hand, if you read the first sentence of the article, it uses the phrase "formalize the transition of the phone to a mobile PC." I don't know about you, but I use my computer for a lot of things, most of which need text and very few involved just video.
So I'd suggest reading a
Re:Shhhhhh! Everyone be quiet! (Score:4, Funny)
This is meant to be a portable pornography portal.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe Microsoft can `deliver` their `phone` in pizza boxes.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
More? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Vacuum cleaners? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:More? (Score:4, Interesting)
If you read Bill Gates' book The Road Ahead [amazon.com] sometime, you'll realize that Gates has some very impractical visions of the future. WebTV was everything he dreamed of for the future of home computers, which is why Microsoft bought them out. It didn't seem to quite occur to Gates that the computer would absorb the television instead. (A subtle but important distinction.) Expect Microsoft to try and make your cellphone into a "Digital Wallet"/Personal Assistant rather than following the more practical "micropayment" designs that Europe ties to cellphones. (Gates believes that the digital wallet will completely replace the leather one.)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Also here in Singapore there is no way you can refill said wallets online, or link them to a bank account (whether its a good idea is another thing) You're limited to paying paper money to load them up, or having to go to an ATM machine and do the t
Tablets.... yawn... (Score:3, Insightful)
MS direction is not set by listening to the market, but by Bill's ego. This is
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The Phone that runs Windows Vista (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:The Phone that runs Windows Vista (Score:5, Insightful)
You're dialing (8), cancel or allow?
.
.
.
.
ten minutes later after you actually are talking to someone
.
.
WinPhone has downloaded and installed an important security update, please reboot your phone
.
.
.
Missing WINPHONE.DLL, Please Restart
Parent
Gee.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Gee.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Gee.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Gee.. (Score:5, Informative)
That really depends on how far back you want to go and how long you want to carry out an argument. Windows CE didn't exist until about five years after the original Newton.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Gee.. (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Gee.. (Score:5, Funny)
Uell maybe some people don't uant a querty. I knou all it does for me is rwin my typing and enswre I have to wse the spell checker.
Parent
Re:Wrong on all counts (Score:5, Informative)
+1 MS Fanboy Troll, but it's late and I have to wait on a long print job.
Phone calls? No. The Newton is probably better compared to a tablet PC, and still people like you wouldn't like it because it wasn't a full "Windows" PC. My old Newton is still way "smarter" than any smart phone I've seen from any vendor running any OS. Granted it took Apple years to get it right. But the last iteration nailed it. It was the most useful device I ever owned. I'd still use it today if I could easily sync it with my current computer.
"Waaa, it's not the device I want!" *GASP* Could it possibly be you're not the target market? I have a smart phone, with a full qwerty keyboard. I'm afraid I have to side with Apple on this one. With my man sized thumbs typing on a virtual keyboard is certainly no less accurate than using my current Barbie Doll sized one. A virtual keyboard goes away when I don't need it, for instance when I'm trying to read a web page. I'll gladly take more screen space to display and a keyboard that only shows up when I need it.
First is not always best, and not always the winner in the market. Microsoft proved that with Windows. Apple has re-proven it with the iPod, and now we'll find out shortly if they're going to do it with smart phones.
And this is precisely why people say Microsoft doesn't innovate. Sure, they could have created the iPhone experience with CE, but they didn't. Microsoft doesn't innovate. They copy. I watched the iPhone introduction and Steve Jobs was right about one thing. In the smart phone market the killer app is MAKING PHONE CALLS! Everything else is just fluff. Since Jobs has returned to Apple they have been very focused on getting the primary functions right the first time, and making sure the fluff is damn good too.
The only reason Microsoft released this info is to try and steal some of Apple's thunder. Sure the iPhone isn't out yet. But in a months time it will be, and every other phone out there is going to be compared to it. I look forward to seeing how it stacks up and if it does well in the one thing I need my mobile phone to do well (MAKING PHONE CALLS) I have $500 ready to spend on it. All the features not related to MAKING PHONE CALLS are just a bonus.
Am I a sheep? No. I prefer to spend my money on things that just work when I need them too. Apple's got a much better track record of that than Microsoft.
Parent
Re:Gee.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
What the FSCK? (Score:4, Funny)
I'm trying to parse that, and I honestly can't figure out whether he wants the iPhone to be more general purpose (like Windows Mobile is, with its ability to download 3rd-party apps) or more special-purpose (like my cell phone is -- even with all the bells and whistles, I only really have to know how to dial a number and hit "send", just like any other cell phone).
I'm assuming he's slamming the iPhone, because you said so. Maybe it makes more sense in context, but... Seriously, what the fsck? It seems like there's some law of nature that as you get higher on the corporate ladder, you must learn to make statements and speeches that:
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Gee.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Three women are talking about their sex lives.
First woman: "My husband's in construction, so he just pounds me like a jackhammer all night long."
Second woman: "My husband's a doctor, so he's always slow, methodical, and compassionate."
Third woman: "My husband works for Microsoft. He just sits on the edge of the bed and tells me how good it's going to be when I get it."
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Lovely... A phone with DRM.. (Score:5, Funny)
"Sorry, Dave, I can't let you take that call from a non-Microsoft phone. Accept or Deny?"
Too many functions (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Anybody know of a phone like this? I've practically stopped bothering with the things recently. So much feature bloat... it was actually hurting performance. I had a Siemens my201x that actually lagged noticeably behind button presses because of how bloated it was.
I have a Nokia 7110 on its way to me right now. It has a bit of superfluous crap, like a browser, but as far as I can tell its mostly phone. Anybody know of anything better?
Re:Too many functions (Score:4, Interesting)
I've wondered about this push to include more and more features. I do however use some of the features in my phone.
I do:
I don't:
Phones are just too small. When I'm doing PC type work, I want a laptop or a PC, not a tiny hand held thing, and especially not one that will "enable my digital lifestyle" (read prevent me from doing anything that does provide revenue for Microsoft).
Parent
Video from phone on TV? (Score:2, Insightful)
-matthew
Re: (Score:2)
MS != 'oracle' anymore (Score:5, Interesting)
As mentioned, they have yet to release any product worth much this century --- say that slowly to yourself!
No matter how hard they try, and they will, MS will not get anything that can be called portable enough to be a 'phone' to also be a person's primary computer, with or without the addition of interfacing to a tv for video output. The claim of running video from it is just a bit absurd at the current level of technology. So what would be the point of saying something like that? Have you ever watched a stage magician at work? Yep, they tell you one thing to keep you distracted while they seemingly work to pull a rabbit out of a hat. We all know that what you get is not what you saw, or think you saw.
First, we have them misquoting reports to make Linux look 'illegal', then pumped up sales figures for Vista, now this? WOW, the MS spin machine will need some new bearings soon. The ones they are using will be worn out soon, if they aren't already about to fail.
The reality of the world is what they are trying to distract us from:
FireFox is gaining ground at the expense of IE
ODF is gaining ground at MS' expense
OOo is gaining ground at MS' expense
Dell is shipping Ubuntu systems at the expense of Vista
Dell is shipping XP systems at the expense of Vista
MS is being implicated in even more illegal/monopolistic dealings
MS' best friends in government are too busy right now to help them out again
BillG's foundation is getting bad press
Apple is still the tech world's stage hog
Zune is all but buried in the back pages of tech history
In fact, nothing MS has touched in recent years has ended up good for them.... and THAT is what they don't want stockholders to realize
I'm betting that some people in Redmond are looking for a new place in the Sun
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
To
Microsoft Research chief Craig Mundie (Score:2)
I remember a few of my research associates quitting their academic positions to go work at Microsoft. They quickly discovered that any respect they had in the field quickly evaporated. It was a tough time for them.
What I gotta wonder is, knowing that the head of the research department at Microsoft is nothin' but a marketting shill, how could expect serious academics to treat you any different?
cell phone internet costs too much and the caps... (Score:2)
Windows Mobile 5.0 (Score:5, Informative)
I have a smart phone right now and it crashes about once a week with no extra software installed other than what came with the phone.
strike
Why not use your eggbeater as a windmill? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why not use your oboe as a bassoon?
Why not use your sleeve as a handkerchief?
Why not use your car as a truck?
Why not use your PC as a doorstop?
Modularity (Score:3, Insightful)
1) In a convergence device, if two parts are important and are still in active development, one part will always obsolesce faster than the other part and force replacement of both.
2) In the particular case of a cell phone/computer, you -can't- replace the phone cheaply and easily until your plan's up (yes, eBay, but that can be tricky), forcing you to use an obsolete computer for the duration.
3) The design considerations for a phone and the design considerations for a portable computer are similar, yes--you want small, thin, and simple to use for both. However, if you want any sort of real power from the portable computer, it's nearly a given that it will need to be bigger and thicker and less simple than a cell phone of the same tech level would be. It needs to do more stuff.
4) Not -all- the design considerations are the same. The portable computer probably wants a relatively large, high resolution screen, and it probably wants to have a touchscreen. A phone doesn't need the complexity or defect rates of a touchscreen, and a high resolution screen on a phone means either a large phone or a relatively high defect rate from a high-pixel-density screen.
5) You don't always want all of your functionality wherever you go. Sometimes you just need a phone. It'd be nice if you could take your 2oz phone with you, instead of your 7oz smartphone.
6) If your phone breaks, you lose your computer, and vice versa.
7) We just don't really need to do it that way, now that bluetooth lets you essentially wear modules in a jacket or nearby bag. You can make a really small phone, if you're not trying to hang a computer off it. You can make it even smaller if you position it to use a bluetooth headset as the primary mic/speaker cluster (of course, you still have built-in ones as backups, but they don't have to be super-comfortable). The classic argument against multiple devices is too much space taken, but if you can make everything as small as they possibly can be for their focused purpose, you can minimize that. Making things smaller is one thing we generally get good at as time goes on.
Sure, there's always going to be a market for phones like the Verizon V/NV or the Sidekick, that do a relatively large subset of the functions of a smartphone for people who don't need more. And eventually, the phone/modem part will hopefully end up standardizing and will be a commodity item that you don't have to chase advancements on. Maybe we'll even drop the current handcuffs model on phone plans. At that point, moving phone functionality into the portable computer makes a lot more sense.
For now though, if you really need a -smart- setup, use separate devices. It seems clunkier and more expensive at the beginning, but you'll always be able to stay at the front of the curve if you want to, and you won't have conflicting buying priorities holding you back.
N95? (Score:5, Interesting)
Phone? Check!
Output to TV? Check!
Video playback to TV? Check!
Plus GPS, running Symbian Series 60 3rd Ed., etc...
So once again M$ comes in late. Good going...
Re: (Score:2)