Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Open Source Laser Business Opens In New York

Posted by kdawson on Tue Dec 12, 2006 07:55 PM
from the burn-baby-burn dept.
Businesses Hardware Hacking
ptorrone writes "If you can't stand the idea of a cookie-cutter laptop and you live in New York City, you have a new option: laser-etching. Phil Torrone, an editor at Make magazine, and Limor Fried, a former fellow at the tech-focused art studio Eyebeam R&D, are working together on Adafruit Laser Services, a new, by-appointment-only business in Manhattan that etches custom artwork onto customers' laptops, iPods, cell phones, and other gadgets." The entire business will be open source. From the Adafruit Laser Services site: "We are publishing how to use the high powered laser system, set up, techniques, business practices and templates. You could start your own laser business, we'll even help you."
+ -
story

Related Stories

Offsite: Eyebeam R&D
Offsite: Limor Fried
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Open Source Laser Business Opens In New York 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.

  • Are the lasers frickin'? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Drooling Iguana (61479) on Tuesday December 12 2006, @07:57PM (#17217170)
    And are they attached to the heads of sharks?

    That should be.

  • How open source is the business? (Score:5, Funny)

    by EmbeddedJanitor (597831) on Tuesday December 12 2006, @08:10PM (#17217324)
    Bank account numbers and passwords please !

  • wait for it. (Score:5, Funny)

    by binarybum (468664) on Tuesday December 12 2006, @08:16PM (#17217404) Homepage
    mod points to the first person to get a goatse etched powerbook and post it.

    you know it's going to happen.

  • Oh! Oh! Can I Be First? (Score:5, Funny)

    by ahem (174666) on Tuesday December 12 2006, @08:20PM (#17217444) Homepage Journal
    "Do not look at laser with remaining eye."

  • Open Source? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by flghtmstr1 (1038678) on Tuesday December 12 2006, @08:24PM (#17217488)
    I thought open source referred to simply making the source code available for public viewing. How can a business "open source" something which is not code? I have noticed an increase in the improper usage of the term "open source" as of late; I've even heard people say that pirating software is "open sourcing" that piece of software.

    • Re:Open Source? (Score:4, Informative)

      by Drooling Iguana (61479) on Tuesday December 12 2006, @08:40PM (#17217630)
      From TFS:

      "We are publishing how to use the high powered laser system, set up, techniques, business practices and templates. You could start your own laser business, we'll even help you."
      • Okay, who do I contact to send over my shipping address? I'd like two-day delivery of my high-powered laser system, but I'll settle for UPS ground since they're so willing to help out.

        Maybe I am asking a bit much from their offer to "help", but we're all in the holiday spirit of giving, right?
        • Not necessarily. This business is only running in NYC. while I doubt anyone would run another shop in NYC, I could imagine someone running one in Chicago or LA as successfully as these guys. I think that is more or less the point of making it "open source," to open the business to a wider customer base without launching a chain.
    • Can you not even spend the slight moment to RTFS?


      We are publishing how to use the high powered laser system, set up, techniques, business practices and templates. You could start your own laser business, we'll even help you

    • Re:Open Source? (Score:5, Informative)

      by ptorrone (638660) * <pt@NOSpAm.adafruit.com> on Tuesday December 12 2006, @08:42PM (#17217652)
      well - all the templates, files, schematics, software we make, jigs, tools - anything that we can open source will be. we didn't construct the laser cutter (maybe we will make a new one) but we'll do our best to put everything out there.
      • See, the issue here is that the 'source' in 'open source' refers to source code - jigs, templates etc are not source code. However, this is a regular enough linguistic phenomenon - see "Irangate" "workaholic" etc. There's no Irangate hotel, nor is there a lot of workahol going around, but we get it.
        • However, this is a regular enough linguistic phenomenon - see "Irangate" "workaholic" etc. There's no Irangate hotel, nor is there a lot of workahol going around, but we get it.

          No, you hit the nail on the head with your first sentence. It's not Open Source. It's way cool, very neat, but it's not Open Source. Typical Slashdot rocket trajectory, high on fumes.

        • there's other software that will be developed, right now no one has anything out there, and certainly not open source - i'll try my best!

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          by trentblase (717954)
          You're not really thinking like a computer scientist. Schematics, templates, jigs (presumably the instructions on building them), etc. can all be source code if you define the language and target system correctly. For example, the template is presumably a set of instructions that tell the engraver where to engrave, what power level, how long, etc. These instructions get compiled or interpreted by the engraver and executed just like any other source code would. amirite?
      • I am very interested, and have sent an email to you, but still is there a link to look at the system besides the products you engraved?
        • hey will, i'm responding to 100+ emails. the system is an epilog mini 35w + filter system. i'll look for your note and send back infoz too.
            • second that.
              I was about to send you an email asking the same thing: what are the start-up and operating costs? (start-up would be cost of the laser device, and operating - your electrical bill)
        • wait what? really software we make, templates and hardware jigs - i guess you'll just need to watch and see. the how-tos, material settings, everything you can't "get" without paying will be available. since you created the "open source" of all this, where is it?

    • Re:Open Source? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by ampathee (682788) on Tuesday December 12 2006, @08:58PM (#17217790)
      I've even heard people say that pirating software is "open sourcing" that piece of software.


      Wow, we need to stamp THAT out quick. Look what happened to "hacker".

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by seanadams.com (463190) *
      How can a business "open source" something which is not code?

      It's a pretty intriguing question actually. Maybe not open source, but businesses can certainly be a lot more open. At Slim Devices we pushed that envelope quite a bit by inviting customers to participate meaningfully in developing the products. <plug>There is an interesting article [fastcompany.com] just posted at Fast Company which asks Is this the company of the future?.</plug>

      I believe it _is_ a model that will work well for many other companies, a

    • Um, the term "Open Source" was in use in the business information and intelligence communities for a long time before someone decided to use it for computer source code and all-around informatic hippy-ness. Anything that's known on the street, published in a newspaper or magazine, is open sourced; this is the opposite condition of something which is secret or privileged. And by the way, who the hell made you the language police?

    • Re:Open Source? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by RealGrouchy (943109) on Tuesday December 12 2006, @10:14PM (#17218268)
      It's like an Open Source business model.

      Compare Microsoft's software with Wal-Mart's business model: we see the output of it, but we don't quite know what techniques they used to get there (like upper-level management techniques, how they decide where to locate their stores, etc.) Try to track down the manufacturers for Wal-Mart products. Try to get a tour of the factory to see the working conditions. Hell, try to take a look at Enron's accounting practises (oops. Too late for that one).

      There are many companies in many sectors who go to great lengths to protect their "source": what it is they're doing that will eventually be their output. An "open" company (okay, I admit that the "source" part is unnecessary, but it does add context to what is meant by "open") will let you see the practises of the company, so that company can show it has nothing to hide.

      With business as with software, openness builds trust.

      - RG>
    • Any "trade secret" could be opened sourced.. from a business rule to some secret formula...

      Not only what's in Coca cola?

      But, How to make it. (how much of x and y, and how to make a batch)

      How to build the machines that make it. (how to build a bottling line, etc.)

      The business logic for how to market and sell it.

      If they hedge their raw products through purchases on the open market, the math behind how they buy and sell the options, etc.

      I could go on and on..
    • ccording to the GPL: "The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it." Open source applies just as well to fields other than software, but there are a lot of fields in which it is not valuable to the user. There are a lot of types of works where the creation of a modified work is meaningless, because what matters is a particular official version (anyone could create a modified US Constitution, but only the original has any particular force). And there are some
  • Laser cookie cutter? If yes, that is freaking cool!
  • I guess that they're not being used for research purposes, but whenever I've worked with lasers it's always been key that communication with the manufacturer is possible. Continuum (etc.) certainly benefits if they're the only ones that ever fix my laser, but then again they have processes for verifying that their calibrations won't screw up my data by more than a certain small amount.

    I guess it really doesn't matter if you're just blasting a CO2 laser in the vague shape of words or something. Sure, alig
    • I guess it really doesn't matter if you're just blasting a CO2 laser in the vague shape of words or something. Sure, alignment is tricky, but I've aligned a low-power open-cavity HeNe on my own--and I imagine if a laser of that power and size gets misaligned, it's probably beyond help.

      I've done some work on the laser etchers by Laser Systems. The CO2 laser is a sealed RF pumped unit from 15-50 watts. The alignment to get it to the target is no big deal. I have aligned one that was knocked out of alignment
      • Hm. With the HeNe lasers I always worked with, the symptom of a misaligned output coupler or high reflector was that you didn't have any significant laser output. I didn't think gas flow lasers were different, so maybe it's something further up the beampath you're talking about. I imagine if the cavity itself were to get damaged, there'd probably be bigger problems than the mirrors.
        • Hm. With the HeNe lasers I always worked with, the symptom of a misaligned output coupler or high reflector was that you didn't have any significant laser output.

          Due to the laser power and wavelength (invisable and starts fire) the laser unit is factory sealed. The alignment I was talking about is entirely downstream of the laser head. The alignment is completed with all interlocks in place and functional. The lid is opened, the mirror tweaked and tape replaced and then the covers are closed and the alig

  • Is this new? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by east coast (590680) on Tuesday December 12 2006, @10:00PM (#17218178)
    Just remember, most pyramid scheme businesses are open source too.... they depend on it.
  • With all the privacy concerns around here, I'd've thought a cookie-cutter laptop would be a good thing...
  • Website hosted on 199.201.145.20 by the l0pht, if people still remember them.

    OrgName: L0pht Heavy Industries
    OrgID: LHI
    Address: 46 Waltham St
    City: Boston
    StateProv: MA
    PostalCode: 02118
    Country: US
  • but Tom came in to work hung over and turned the laser all the way up. We burned a hole right through your new MacBook Pro. Thankfully, you signed the waiver, so we're good. I hope you have backups of all that business data though.
    • >'Though there is one problem,how does one etching business gain over the other?'

      That question is rooted in a traditional business model, which is what this type of business is trying to not be.

      Instead of thinking that competition is part of the business plan by default, why not think cooperation instead. If your shop uptown gets a large order that it can't handle and meet the delivery date, you hand off the excess production to another shop downtown.

      If you can't afford to pay for a promotion, c

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.