Teen Creates Device to Track Speeding

An anonymous reader writes "A teen in Massachusetts has created a device that he hopes will help prevent traffic fatalities among teenagers. The unit plugs into a car and uses GPS to track and report on speeding — but only while the car exceeds a limit set by parents, so as to minimize invasion of the teen's privacy."

Untill...

[Spad (470073)]

Parents set limit to 5mph - track kids everywhere they go.

Re:Untill...

[D-Cypell (446534)]

This is exactly what I would do. Get job, buy and maintain own car, earn privacy. Besides, there is a huge difference between knowing where your car (and child) is and evesdropping on their conversations etc.

Even at the age of 25 I am starting to think that the world we be better off if children had a few less freedoms. I probably would have felt different 10 years ago however :).

You learn through mistakes

[brunes69 (86786)]

People who coddle their children have them grow into misfits, because they don't know how to act in the real world. On the other hand, people who let their kids run wild have them grow to be criminals and outcasts, because the kids grow witht he notion that it doesn't matter what they do since no one cars.

You should raise a child with plenty of freedom, but make sure the child knows they will be held responsible for their own mistakes. I was given my own car when I was 16 - but I had to pay my own insurance. And I knew if I trashed the thing, or got tickets so my insurance would go up, etc - that Mommy and Daddy would *not* be bailing me out.

Re:You learn through mistakes

[D-Cypell (446534)]

I couldn't agree more. However, I think it is very important to let the reins out slowly. The jump from getting everywhere on foot (or bicycle) to driving is a huge one in terms of responsibility and freedom. This device seems to be a good way to break up this huge jump by saying, "Yes you can now spread your wings a little, but we will be checking exactly where you are spreading them until you earn the right to take the next step. I wouldn't class this as 'coddling' but more as demonstrating that certain rights have to be earned. I have known several people who killed themselves on the road within a year of getting their driving license and many more who (in my opinion) are lucky to be alive. I was often laughed at for driving at reasonable speed and following basic road rules but if my circle were going anywhere and there were a few cars to travelling in... mine was always full :).

Managing the jumps in freedom is one of the biggest parental responsibilities. This is clearly demonstrated by all the students who gain their first feeling of independance when they go to university and decide that the best thing to do would be to drink themselves to death.

Re:You learn through mistakes

[GeckoX (259575)]

There's trust, and there's trust.

Trust your 16 year old to be good, honest etc etc.

Don't trust your 16 year old to make the right decision the first time they're at a friends house, have a couple drinks with the older brother, and have their shiney new car you bought them sitting outside.

Trust must be earned, and is not a blanket that covers everything all in one go.

Oblig. Ronald Reagan quote

[The_REAL_DZA (731082)]

"Trust, but verify."

Have you raised a teenager?

[shaneh0 (624603)]

I ask my son to see his report card, I don't take his word for it. If he's supposed to be home at midnight, I stay up until he gets home, I don't take his word for it. I make him keep his bedroom door open when he has his girlfriend over to "do homework."

I trust my son. I let him borrow my car. I trust him to watch his sister. I trust him to stay at home overnight by himself on occassion.

But if you think a 16 year old won't lie through his teeth to get out of trouble, you're insane. There is no question about this.

Your comments suggest to me that you're either a child yourself, or you've never raised a child yourself. Nothing personal, but if you "trust" your teenager to act like a responsible adult, you're probably making a mistake. There's a reason that 18 is the age of majority, and not 15, 16, or even 17. If you quit parenting at 16 because you think you've done a good enough job so far, you're just begging for trouble.

Re:Have you raised a teenager?

[drunkennewfiemidget (712572)]

Bull. It depends on the kid. At 16, I had all the freedoms in the world. I went where I wanted, I did what I wanted, and I acted as I pleased. I had earned it, and my parents knew I would behave myself.

And I did.

My son is only 5 now, but if I think I can trust him to behave himself at 16, I'll give him the freedoms that comes with it.

Re:Have you raised a teenager?

[kalirion (728907)]

There's a reason that 18 is the age of majority, and not 15, 16, or even 17.

Ah, the magical switch that flips when a kid turns 18, making him a responsible adult....

Re:Have you raised a teenager?

[Disavian (611780)]

Preface: sorry if I'm a little harsh. This is meant in good faith, and is not intended to be a personal attack. I am attempting to describe issues I have strong beliefs on/in.

I ask my son to see his report card, I don't take his word for it.

A wise choice. Nothing keeps him from forging it, though.

If he's supposed to be home at midnight, I stay up until he gets home, I don't take his word for it.

Kinda creepy... midnight's pretty early, too. Seriously, extend the deadline until 1AM and see what happens. Nothing out of the ordinary, I bet. He's going to have to handle staying out late when he leaves home, you might as well teach him how to do it.

I make him keep his bedroom door open when he has his girlfriend over to "do homework."

That's just stupid. If you want to make a kid hate you, that's the way to do it. Give up on trying to keep him from having sex; he's going to have it one way or another. A parent promoting abstinance is like nailing jello to the wall. Instead, make sure he (they) has (have) ready access to contraception.

I trust my son. I let him borrow my car. I trust him to watch his sister. I trust him to stay at home overnight by himself on occassion. But if you think a 16 year old won't lie through his teeth to get out of trouble, you're insane. There is no question about this.

You'll trust him with someone else's life, but you won't trust him with his own? And when was the last time you saw someone telling "the truth" just because they were an "adult"? Your defense of your actions has nothing to do with the issue at hand; that is, is he mature enough to handle the responsibilities and freedoms of being an adult. Is he mature enough to use contraception, to do his homework, and to maintain his judgement in the face of peer pressure?

Those are skills you can't teach him; you have to let him learn for himself.

Your comments suggest to me that you're either a child yourself, or you've never raised a child yourself.

Have you ever heard of an "ad hominem" attack? It's called a logical fallacy for a reason.

Nothing personal, but if you "trust" your teenager to act like a responsible adult, you're probably making a mistake.

Trusting anyone is a mistake, but we have to if we want to live like normal people.

There's a reason that 18 is the age of majority, and not 15, 16, or even 17.

Oh really? Tell me why. I honestly want to know why the lightswitch of maturity magically flips when a human has been on this rock for eighteen orbits around a small, yellow sun. Although it is tangental, I suppose you also support the drinking age of 21, and will say that is there for a reason. You would be correct-- it's there becuase federal government funds don't go to states that have drinking ages lower than that. Don't you remember how the drinking age was 18 in most states when you were a kid? If a state feels like standing up for VOTING CITIZENS against the US theocracy, they could. However, the kind of need the money more.

If you quit parenting at 16 because you think you've done a good enough job so far, you're just begging for trouble.

Yes. But the pussification of America's youth is complete; we don't let them grow up for themselves. That recent story about UGA students having coupons for booze passed out to them -- oh noes, alcohol! Grow the fark up.

In summary -- we don't let our kids "grow up" any more. We somehow got the idea that we have to "help" them, when what they really need is to be left alone, and possibly guided. This tool is a symptom of the disease that is parenting in America. If your child can't handle being alone in a room with a girl at 16, what makes you think he'll be any different at 18? Because his prefrontal cortex will be 18% larger? He may be busy with school and activities, but real maturity doesn't come from a textbook, and you know it.

Re:Have you raised a teenager?

[TheSkyIsPurple (901118)]

I completely disagree with this - because it's a blanket statement. Some people are mature enough for intimiate relationships by the age of 16 - in that case protected (IE with a condom) sex isn't a problem.
i thought you said you taught him about condoms?

It doesn't sound like his child is in a position to have responsible sex. Condom [wikipedia.org]s aren't 100% effective. They break sometimes, they aren't always kept in the proper conditions, applied properly, etc.

The kid is not living on his own, and not providing hit own way, nor I'm guessing is he prepared to do so.

Putting those two together, the kid would be exposing himself to a better than 1 in 50 chance of getting a girl pregnant in good circumstances, and having to deal with the consequences... consequences which would also affect the kid's parent as well.

It would be irresponsible to take an action for which there is an expected response that you are not capable of handling. Wouldn't it? Especially when that response directly affects the life of another.

I agree: trust your teen
But: There's a reason auto insurance rates don't drop until you're 25 though... trust your teen to lie to your or be stupid from time to time. Create an environment in which they can talk to you about their screw-ups, but do your part to ensure those screwups aren't as likely to happen also.

Re:Have you raised a teenager?

[shaneh0 (624603)]

This was originally posted by an A.C. as a reply to one of your other posts, but I'm going to repost it here. I agree totally.

---

You're a moron. You think you're all grown up at 22? The biggest mistakes of your life still lie ahead of you.

What's arrogance is a 22 year old who thinks he's all grown up. What's arrogance is a 22 year old who thinks he knows better for someones child then the person who RAISED the child. What's arrogance is opening your mouth and offering opinions about things you've never experienced.

When you're a student, you see a lot of teachers. You can describe their job. You can explain their responsibilities. A student can emulate his teacher. A student can occassionally even teach his teacher. But that doesn't prepare a student to *be* a teacher. That isn't an insult to the student, it's just a fact of life.

Someday you'll be a teacher. That day is not today.

---

Wait for your day, son.

Re:Have you raised a teenager?

[shaneh0 (624603)]

I've taught my son humility. I've taught him that he isn't always right. I've taught him to respect his elders. I've taught him that he's going to be wrong more often then he's going to be right.

You're 22 fricken years old. You're SIX YEARS OLDER then the child we're discussing here. How do you think you're AT ALL qualified to raise a 16 year old when you're 22? Give me a break, man.

You don't think I'd like to be 22 again? Of course I would. And if we were debating the finer points of picking up women at a dance club or dorm-life in america today, you'd have the upper hand. But you're just not equipped for this debate. It's outside your area of expertise.

Really, let it go. You've posted 30 comments in this thread and I haven't seen a single one modded up. Do you think all the mod's are "ageists?" Perhaps they've just recognized your posts as trolling for an argument.

It doesn't seem to me like you're mature enough to even handle slashdot, let alone raising a teenager.

I don't think you understand just what we're talking about. A little mini-man who feels like he's all grown up, who feels like he's got the world by the balls. A boy old enough to look in the mirror and see the face of a man. It's not easy today to raise a child to be a good person. There are 100 different things trying to pull him from the path that his mother and I have set him on.

This has been a fun way to waste a morning. I'll talk about my kids any chance I get. What I won't do, however, is give unsolicited parenting advice. I suggest you do the same.

Re:Have you raised a teenager?

[Cthefuture (665326)]

I wouldn't say they are a moron. This is typical of that age group. From 18-25 or so you think you have grown up and know what you are doing. You realize there are things you don't know about but at the same time you think you know what they are and can handle them. It's the age of what I would call adult arrogance (versus teen-age arrogance). You think you are humble but really you have no idea what it means.

It's only once you get past 25 or so (depending on experience) you realize what it means to be humble. As the OP stated, there are a lot of humbling experiences to be had in the 18-25 ages and these change you. You realize that you truly don't know anything and will experience many more humbling moments. It's at that point you become what I consider an adult.

Re:You learn through mistakes

[toofast (20646)]

I don't think it's a sense of distrust... But then again, when I got my license to drive at 17, my
parents only very reluctantly lent me their car twice. Despite being on my best behaviour both times, they made it clear that if I wanted to drive, I would have to buy my own car.

So I got a part time job, borrowed money from Dad and bought a decent used car, and paid back every penny of my loan. And hey, the car was mine, so I was free to do as I please. Abuse it? Break it? Too bad, I had to fix it.

Despite that, I still managed to earn a college diploma and today, at 33, I have a wife, kids, 3 cars, a nice house that's paid for and a great job.

I think letting your kids drive around in a vehicle that doesn't belong to them reduces their incentive to work and pay for what they want. Has nothing to do with responsibility. You want it, earn it!

Re:You learn through mistakes

[GeckoX (259575)]

_giving_ a 16 year old a car is the STUPIDEST thing ANY parent could do at that point.

For SOO many reasons.

Driving a vehicle is a huge responsibility, one which most 16 year olds are not fully ready for, PARTICULARLY if they're just handed the keys...they have no concept of the repercussions. They have no respect for vehicles. They have no concept of the financial end of things. And by GIVING them a car, you take away the chance for them to learn these things.

I never had my own car until I worked my ass off long enough to buy my own, and pay for my own insurance.

I was able to borrow my parents car, on occasion, but certainly not regularly. And even then, I had to pay for my own insurance.

I've never wrecked a car. I've never been reckless with a car. My sister, my wife, her brother...all similar circumstances growing up. ALL of us have respect for vehicles.

Just about everyone I know though that was given their first car ended up totalling it in one way or the other.

Re:You learn through mistakes

[indifferent children (842621)]

Or Montana.

No, too many armed crazies in Montana. Stick with Iraq or Afghanistan.

Yup

[Moraelin (679338)]

That's what I was thinking. My parents were such control freaks, that I had one of them or grandma on my back pretty much the whole time. Even in about half the summer camps or such, one would actually take a vacation to come keep an eye on me. I have no doubt that if such a device had existed, they'd have set the speed limit to 1 mph just for tracking sake.

Re:Yup

[by Anonymous Coward]

How dare you speak about me and your mother like that!

Re:Untill...

[palad1 (571416)]

Then smart kids will drive backwards.

(I know, I know... gps, vectors, maths, yadda yadda)

Re:Untill...

[D-Cypell (446534)]

I can just see hundreds of parents congratulating themselves on doing such an excellent job because their son/daughter drives at -120MPH.

Backwards

[Savage-Rabbit (308260)]

Then smart kids will drive backwards.

Are you sure that is a good idea? There was a gear-head in Germany (IIRC) who reversed the superstructure on his WV Beetle so that the boot was at the front and he looked out what used to be the rear window while driving. He was eventually banned from driving the car due to the fact that the wierd way it looked caused so many accidents.

Re:Untill...

[bitflip (49188)]

Why drive backwards? Just turn the GPS unit around so it's facing the other way...

Re:Untill...

[discord5 (798235)]

Parents set limit to 5mph - track kids everywhere they go.

Child has device rigged by friend with knowledge of electronics... Parents baffled.

Never underestimate the great lengths kids will go through to do something they're not supposed to and get away with it. In fact, adults probably'd do the same.

In more recent news...

[by Anonymous Coward]

said teen is tracked down and given a beating for being such a snitch. Film at eleven.

not perfect

[joe 155 (937621)]

couldn't you just take the thing out or un-plug it? then it'd look like you never drove over the speed limit : )

More seriously this relies on the people who are driving (you can do it from 16, right?) being rational and sensible. If they were rational and sensible they wouldn't do it because it would make them look bad to their parents, but they wouldn't do that anyway because they wouldn't want to break the law and risk their lives. If the people weren't rational and sensible they would drive like an idiot anyway and not thing of the consequences (something I think is far more likely).

Further I'm not even convinced that speeding is that dangerous, drink/drug driving is far more likely to result in a fatal accident - and I have met people who do just that for fun. It's idiocy but these are just the people who you'd need to deal with...

Oh, please.

[Triv (181010)]

I don't want to know how fast my (hypothetical) kid is driving 99% of the time. It's not my business, it's really not, unless he gets hurt, hurts someone else, damages MY property or gets in trouble with the police. I don't care what he does until something happens. THAT'S when I spring into dad-mode. THAT'S when I start to ask questions and yell and devise new and cunning punishments. Until then, it's up to him what he does. Hopefully I'd've raised him smarter than to put himself and his passengers into danger, and I'll assume I did until he proves me wrong.

It's called trust. Remember that?

Triv

Re:Oh, please.

[Chaffar (670874)]

It's called trust. Remember that?

You'd trust your kids if you actually bothered educating them about what's right and what's wrong. But most parents have outsourced that function to a third entity (School/ Friends/ Neighbours/ TV/ All of the above).

We don't educate our kids anymore, we give them Ritalin.

Re:Oh, please.

[Firehed (942385)]

I'd kill for a mod point right now. And by kill, I mean some sort of responsible alternative, since my morals thankfully weren't outsourced.

Re:Oh, please.

[Chanc_Gorkon (94133)]

Yes. It is called trust. However, trust is not something anyone should automagically get....even your kid. Trust is something that's earned. In the case of my son, he won't DRIVE if he does something I don't agree with. All of this is conditional though. Everyone has an occasional slip. Speeding tickets are just that. If he gets more then one or continues to have an issue, he's done. No monitoring needed......he won't drive until we say so. Why? Because I AM THE PARENT. So long as he lives in my house, it's my rules in and out of the house. After he leaves, he can get his privacy but not until then.

Re:Oh, please.

[Kamiza Ikioi (893310)]

As for me, it certainly is my business. They are a "kid", a child, not an adult. Parents have the right to know where, when, who, etc. A parent has the right to tell their child, for instance, that they can't leave the state or city. A parent has the right to tell their child they can't go to a party where liquor is being served or drugs are being used. A parent has the right to tell their child that they cannot speed.

I'm not saying I'd track the kid, but I will tell them to drive the speed limit, and whether they get in trouble or not, I expect them to follow my rules. Otherwise, you're telling your kid, "Hey, as long as you don't get caught, I don't care if you [insert illegal activity here]." Children need sensable boundaries along with the freedom to be themselves.

Forget kids, if I lone my car out to anyone, I have the right to know where they are going, who will be going with them, and that they are obeying all traffic laws while using MY car.

I'm all for privacy, but call me old fashioned. Children living in MY house live under MY rules. As my father told me and his father before him... you are free to do whatever you please after you move out. This may offend some younger /.r's, but a 16 year old who just got their license is certainly NOT a mature adult capable of making their own rules up. With age and maturity comes more freedom. But for a young new driver, I can't see an almost no rules environment where the one rule is "I'm not getting bailed out of jail".

Would I actually put a GPS bug in my child's car? No. I would rather buy a pre-paid cellphone and hide it somewhere in the interior of the car with a power adapter spliced to the wiring, and let my child know about it. This for safety, not privacy invasion. Car gets stolen or child comes up missing, one phone call by the police to the cell phone company will locate the car.

Also, let's not confuse child privacy with adult privacy. I find no moral or legal grounding for a child's right to privacy from their own parents. Those who say otherwise are either trying to be the "cool" parent or are not a parent. "I don't care what he does until something happens. THAT'S when I spring into dad-mode." I'm not telling you how to raise your children, because that is certainly not my business. But, since it is your "(hypothetical)" kid, I can already guess you want to be the "cool" parent. Just realize it's a little late to spring into dad-mode when they hit a telephone poll at 100mph killing their girlfriend and paralyzing themselves, because his "best bud" wants to look the other way until something bad happens. There is no "dad-mode". You are either a dad, or you are not.

That's equivalent to not telling your child to not play with the stove until they get 3rd degree burns on their hands. I'd be interested to hear your comments when you actually have a 16 year old with a license.

It's called parenting. And you haven't learned that yet.

Re:Oh, please.

[lgftsa (617184)]

Just realize it's a little late to spring into dad-mode when they hit a telephone poll at 100mph killing their girlfriend and paralyzing themselves

Killing themselves is simply evolution in action. The girlfriend is complicit in her own fate, unless she was held in the car against her will. It's the oncoming vehicles/pedestrians/etc who are innocent bystanders who you should feel sorry for.

I can't understand the hand wringing over the hoons who kill themselves, and I include the passengers in that category. If the driver is unsafe, don't be in the car.

Perhaps I have a overdeveloped sense of self-presevation, but I don't allow someone to endanger me even if they are one of the "cool crowd" or a "friend".

Re:Oh, please.

[jacquems (610184)]

It's called parenting.

I think the ultimate goal of parenting is to help your children learn how to make good decisions. The only way to do that is to let them make some and experience the logical consequences of their actions. For example, if your kid leaves his bike outside in the rain and it rusts, he gets a much clearer message about why it's important to put the bike away than if you simply tell him to put it away "because I said so". I do draw the line at safety issues, but even then I don't have iron-clad rules enforced by punishment. I let my daughter know what is the safe thing to do and why (i.e. "Your head can get hurt if you fall off the bike. Always wear a bike helmet.") and help her do it until she's ready to do it on her own.

Children also need to feel worthwhile and valued in the family. When children feel that they are worthwhile human beings, they are more likely to act with their safety in mind, and to want to please their parents. More than anything, I think the feeling that my parents cared about my well-being was what made me want to be a safe driver as a teenager. I knew that people often got hurt or killed while driving, and I did my best to make sure it wouldn't happen to me (at least not through my own fault).

Parents need to guide and advise their children - by sharing their values and stating their expectations - but in the end children need to learn to think for themselves. Hopefully by the time a child is old enough to drive, he/she will have had enough practice making good decisions about other things to also make smart choices when driving. If not, all the high-tech parental spying gadgets in the world aren't going to help.

Re:Oh, please.

[[e-mail] (18794)]

I don't have a hypothetical kid. I have a real kid. And as a parent I know it's my responsibility to be aware of when my son is doing stupid which could harm him. It's not a lack of trust, it's a realization that kids do things that are dumb regardless of how responsible they or their parents think they are. I know that when I was a teen I did things I should not have, and would have been better off avoiding. I also remember thinking that I was much more responsible and mature than my peers. I now know that I didn't have a clue, and that my parents were right the vast majority of the time.

What teens don't realize is their situation is hardly unique. One of the things you start to realize as you mature is that you and your parents aren't so different. My parents grew up in the 40's & 50's, I grew up in the 80's and 90's. Even with that type of difference in age I realize now the same issues I faced, they had bee through 3 or 4 decades earlier. Parents do have good advice and insight to give their children, if they'll actually listen. Problem is, kids in every generation think they're the only ones with these particular issues or problems, and they're flat out wrong.

Teens want freedom. That's natural. But with freedoms come responsibility that most kids just aren't able to see the entire scope of. That's where parents come in and take some of that responsibility upon themselves to curb their childrens freedoms when neccessary. A parent should never at any point say, well, you're X age, I've done what I can, good luck. I still take advice from my old man. And appreciate it more now.

Of course teen /.rs reading this will disagree... I probably would have, had /. been available via gopher.

Why only for teens?

[OscarBlock (861399)]

Maybe this should be fitted to the cars of adults - the results could be sent to their local schools to show that they are setting a good example.

Privacy?

[alzoron (210577)]

I'm assuming they're driving this car in public. Unless they're driving through their room with the door shut how could this be a violation of privacy?

The car is legally the parents responsibility. The teen is legally the parents responsibility. Kids expect so much privacy these days.

How?

[onion2k (203094)]

The device, which plugs into the electrical outlet in a car and sits on the dashboard, will monitor a car's speed only when the driver exceeds a specified limit.

Is it a magical device? Because I don't see how it can only monitor the speed of the car only when the car is speeding. It'd need to monitor the speed of the car all the time to know when it starts speeding. I can see that it might only log the GPS location of the car when the speed exceeds a certain amount .. but that's not what the article says.

spanfastic

[sporkme (983186)]

I think this is wonderful. The news is not about tracking teens, nor is it about snooping governments. This is a success story for an young engineer. This kid has seen his invention from conception, through development and prototype, all the way to investment. He has polled his resources and called upon special talents: (from TFA) "Jon's sister, Julie, 21, helped coin the device's name, and Jon's uncle, Kurt Lanza, helped with the computer programming." He has a specific goal in mind. "His program weeds out extra information from the GPS, protecting teens' privacy. Their parents can see what they're doing only if they break the rules set by the parents." IMHO Jonathan Fischer may be a Benedict Arnold to some "Speed Demon" kids, but to proponents of safe driving and to parents who have buried their children, he is a Benjamin Franklin.

Keep going, Jon. Call me if you need a good email checker-er-er.

This is appalling

[Toby The Economist (811138)]

We learn what we *do*.

What's a teenager doing when he's being monitored by his parents?

What he's doing is not being trusted. So he's learning that his parents do not trust him, and he's learning that they will forcefully impose themselves into his life to coerce his behaviour; he's learning to resent them and he's learning that speeding is only wrong because it is prohibited by parents.

Dude...

[theonetruekeebler (60888)]

He is so getting his ass kicked in school tomorrow.

That said, this is probably the best incentive a teen ever had to get a job, save money, and buy his own damn car.

Way to shoot yourself in the foot

[NMerriam (15122)]

Should be titled "Teen creates device to prevent himself from ever being invited to parties".

Re:Way to shoot yourself in the foot

[Schraegstrichpunkt (931443)]

Should be titled "Teen creates device to prevent himself from ever being invited to parties".

Where do you think this teen got the free time to create this device? Perhaps it was from already not being invited to parties?

Step 1. Jocks refuse to invite geek to parties
Step 2. Geek sells GPS device to jocks' parents.
Step 3. Fun and Profit!

I'm not sure that's the answer

[symbolic (11752)]

Much of teen driving problems come from two sources: overconfidence, and distractions. Some states have laws that permit only a certain number of people in the car at certain stages of the licencing process- and they do that for a reason. Teens are notorious for packing friends into a car to go out and 'have a good time', but the passengers become a major source of distraction. Despite what young drivers may think of their abilities, they need to concentrate on driving, and worry about having 'fun' after they exit the vehicle.

Not always speed

[Trailwalker (648636)]

I work for a large cemetery. Every year, we have two periods when teens are killed in automobile accidents. The few weeks after school starts and the few weeks after school is out.

These accidents seldom involve speeding. They usually happen in the teens own neighborhood. Losing control of the vehicle and hiting something solid or rolling over cause the fatalities.

Better driver education, more emphasis on seatbelt use, etc. would save more lives than any speed recorder.

Old news...saw this on TV 3 years ago

[cjmnews (672731)]

A parent demonstrated the same device 3 years ago on TV. Showed that he caught his son doing 42 in a 35 zone.
Seems like the older device was better as it somehow showed the speed limit of the road with the speed of the car.

I don't see how this MA kid recently "invented" this device.

Re:

[brian.glanz (849625)]

Setting it to 50 is not necessarily to assume and report all driving above 50 as speeding. If an interested party set it to 50: they'd not be assuming the driver can never legally exceed 50, but that whenever the driver is exceeding 50 they are concerned enough to want speed data correlated with location and limit. BG

Re:

[Schraegstrichpunkt (931443)]

Yes because we can so trust the parents to have the teenager's interests in mind when it comes to these things.

Teens are generally not responsible adults. The ones who are are capable of moving out on their own, and getting their own car.

If the parents aren't considering the teenager's interests, then that teenager is probably already screwed beyond repair, and a GPS device isn't exactly going to make the situation worse.

Re:

[Erwos (553607)]

First off, this is a trust _verification_ mechanism. If you've got such issues with your kid that you think they're going to start pulling stuff like you just described, the obvious answer is to just not hand them the car.

Making the assumption that all you can do is disable the GPS antenna, and not actually tamper with the logs or the device physically, don't you think the parent might notice something when the device points out that they didn't have a GPS lock (or even PRN sighting) at any time during thei

Re:

[rolfwind (528248)]

Plus the speed limit is painfully slow in some areas. Everybody goes 65-75 on my local "55"mph highway. How will the teen react if the device is set to 55mph, will s/he follow it out of obligation and get themselves killed*

I'd much rather have a built in car device that detects the blood-alcohol level of the driver (any driver, not just teens) and not start the car. Once the car is started, I think any dumb device like this is dangerous for all involved. I mean, by the time your kids start driving, they

Re:That's great, now how about one for you, dad?

[Dachannien (617929)]

If I was a teenager I would only agree to use the device if my parents agreed to put one in their vehicles as well;

Hope you like walking, then, son.