Palm to Announce New Treo in September 88
bain writes "Reuters reports that Palm has committed to unveiling at least one of its next-gen Treos next month. It's believed that it will be the Windows Mobile-based UMTS model first mentioned for Vodafone in July." From the article: "The California-based firm said in July the new version will operate on Vodafone's high-speed third generation (3G) network and be powered by Microsoft Corp.'s Windows Mobile operating system, however details about the handset's functionality remain sketchy. The current 700p version of the latest Treo has a slot for Wi-Fi and Bluetooth cards, but with the latest Nokia, Sony Ericsson and O2 offerings all boasting the technology in-built, Palm knows it can not afford to fall further behind as the competition heats up."
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt it if anybody within Palm reads
Re: (Score:1)
Sorry, Symbian 60 has won this Palm user (Score:5, Insightful)
Come on! This thing runs python! You can whip up your own apps in a few minutes, without any of the kludge needed for the supposedly homebrew-friendly Palm OS.
Additionally the natively multitasking OS that is Symbian is impressive - I never really understood the advantage of this when using a Palm, but now really love the ability to jump between my calendar, text, email and Soduku mid-task without having to restart things. Very nice.
Palm fans - have a look at S60, it seems to be have a lot in common with the culture of the Palm community in the mid-90's.
N80, here I come. Sorry Palm.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I looked at the Windows Mobile Palm 700w. Yuck. It's just begging for viruses or other problems.....
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed... though, if you really want to see what a Palm-based calendaring app can do, check out DateBk5 [pimlicosoftware.com]. It blows Palm's calendaring application clean out of the water.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Agreed. I am a longtime fan of Palm, but their smartphone line sucks hairy goat nad.
Weak bluetooth stack, no wifi capability (crippled, even), legendary instability, low memory, inability to properly use an SD/MMC card for memory, not just weak but positively craptastic phone app... all in a bulky-assed package. That's the Treo 600/650/700p.
I've moved to a Nokia 6265i with a T|X. It's still not perfect, because Palm's crippled the bluetooth dialing of their handhelds, but I can hack around that easi
Re:Sorry, Symbian 60 has won this Palm user (Score:5, Informative)
I like the idea of controlling multiple devices with a single BT master (which is what I htink you were describing) so I decided to check into this. Note that I am not an export of BT and have never read any of the specs until now. Okay, so Google pointed me to the Bluetooth website at http://www.bluetooth.com./ [www.bluetooth.com] There you can find the architecture specs for the protocal.
The handsfree spec requires certain QoS guarantees, and imposes some requirements on the phones. For example, there can be only one handsfree (HF) device perl phone (AG). ALL sounds, including voice, KEY TONES, voice dialing, music, etc must be routed over the link to the HF device. For that reason cell for phones likely try to keep handsfree devices in the Active state for as long as they are connected. The important bits of text can be found in the Hands Free Specification, section 4.6:
To elaborate, BT slave devices can be set to either Active or Parked. Parked devices can't talk back to the phone, but the phone still needs to transmit a beacon packet every time the slaves reserved time slice comes up. Active mode devices can communicate based on one of several protocols. Handsfree requires Synchronous Connection-Oriented or SCO, which provides 64Kb CDR audio communication. It also requires that the physical link connnection remain in the Active state.
Cell phones probably have very light BT stacks, including extremely limited buffers. That probably sets a hard limit on the number of devices that they can form active physical links with. To that end, the cell makers most likely set up handsfree systems to automatically park all other physical connections.
If you were thinking that the phones should then just set up a new BT network with other non HF devices, think again.
I found this paragraph in Section volume 1, section 4.1 of the Core specification titled "Piconet Topology"
Due to use of TDMA slices as the master channel, hosting more than once Piconet with the same master (or just on the same channel) would not work. If BT used CDMA, this would be possible. It should be possible for your phone to be a SLAVE to your other devices while MASTER to the handsfree.
Lesson: there is more to this than you think. The core spec alone is 1300 pages of IEEE dribble.
Re: (Score:1)
To elaborate, BT slave devices can be set to either Active or Parked. Parked devices can't talk back to the phone, but the phone still needs to transmit a beacon packet every time the slaves reserved time slice comes up. Active mode devices can communicate based on one of several protocols. Handsfree requires Synchronous Connection-Oriented or SCO, which provides 64Kb CDR audio communication. It also requires that the physical link connnection remain in the Active state.
The phone shuts down the audio co
Re: (Score:2)
I am a bit fuzzy as to how SCO is implemented in practice. It's QoS guarantee might be the real problem here. A note on "Parking"... I think parking the device will save any real battery life. Parked devices can ONLY recieve beacons, so the phone doesnt have to do any real legwork there.
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
[1]Anything But Microsoft
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I will have to wait a bit, alas, for I just bought a Treo 650 three weeks ago. It hasn't crashed once since either, so I am quite happy with it. Now, if I could just find a cheap screenless bluetooth GPS unit to go with it...
Treo using Windows Mobile (Score:4, Insightful)
I preferred the Palm OS. Simple yet effective. And who's to say that the Windows Mobile OS won't crash just as much? Plus you have to worry about viruses and security issues with Windows. Sure it looks prettier, but I don't like the move.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Palm is the plain old analog watch of PDAs. You look at it and it tells you the time; no frills, no multiple time zones, stopwatches, lap
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Hope this helps...
Re: (Score:1)
The only complaint is that it takes about 30 seconds to get back the signal if it loses it
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I say for one. I've owned both and they're both horrible but nothing crashes as frequently as a Treo 650. It is pathetic.
"Plus you have to worry about viruses and security issues with Windows."
Virus and security concerns are not significantly different among mobile platforms. Windows Mobile is not Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My Treo 650 only crashes due to 3rd-party hacks (Score:3, Interesting)
Unfortunately, Silkscreen provided a number of unique valuable functions. It lets me use Graffiti instead of just the keyboard, thus allowing me to use the "shortcut" key and punctuation marks like the semicolon. (I can't believe that the T
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I went back to paper because of Palm (Score:3, Interesting)
And you know what, I'm glad I made the transition. It's easier to look up data in the paper day planner, it's not delicate, and all I have to do is transcribe my changes into my computer once
Re: (Score:2)
I actually don't own a Windows based phone for that reason. I've heard a couple of first hand accounts from people that bitched about its stability. I have several friends with Treos and I haven't heard a thing about crashes.
"Plus you have to worry about viruses and security issues with Windows. Sure it looks prettier, but I don't like the move.'
I haven't heard a peep about security proble
Re: (Score:2)
And at least in the case of Palm, there are developed remedies for some of the instability problems. The first two pieces of software I installed on my T|X were:
1. Resco Locker (an absolute must if you have an NVFS-based device)
2. UDMH
With those apps, my T|X very rarely crashes.
Not dead, just deserves to die (Score:5, Interesting)
The platform showed such promise initially; with an admirable focus which is the antithesis of the Windows mobile 'everything but the kitchen sink' approach. Unfortunately for the last few years their desktop AND PDA software has stagnated, and their hardware is hardly sensational compared to the phones which are out now. I think the problems all started when they spun off palm-source, which is now in a death-spiral and still trying to sell products which belong in the 1990s. Watch MS carefully cut off Palm's air-supply once they become dependant on Windows CE.
Where are the PDAs with strong links between a carefully chosen set of PIM applications, which syncs seamlessly with desktops on all operating systems?
Where are the ebooks with larger screens rolled up inside them, or a projector, and which use the millions of free classics on sites like Project Gutenberg?
Where is the new mobile operating system which should have arrived years ago, tailored to these devices and their limitations?
Re:Not dead, just deserves to die (Score:5, Informative)
Seriously. Palm has been in a sinkhole for many years now. Consider that last year, Palm paid PalmSource -- a company that it spun off from itself -- $30 million [siliconvalley.com] just for the right to use the name "Palm" again! (They'd rebranded themselves as "PalmOne" during the spinoff process, and split the rights to the "Palm Inc." name with PalmSource.)
Palm Inc. will someday be a case study for MBAs on how to take something great and drive it right into the ground.
Re: (Score:1)
It started off as a promising unit inside 3Com, which was then spun off. A nice move except that the major brains left soon after (and some of them started Handspring).
Not long after Palm started to stagnate and see other Palm OS licensees passing it by handily (at least technologically, even if not in terms of sales, Palm always has been favoured because of its name), it bought Handspring, which rejuvenated itself for a while.
Then, Palm again starte
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Who cares? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why wouldn't I want the latest and greatest symbian device, instead? Why do I even care about Palm?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The article also doesn't mention that Sprint is (apparently) getting the Treo 700wx in September, which is suppos
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As far as ergonomics, the E61 is pretty bad. There's a nonprogram
Re: (Score:2)
Dillettante reporting (Score:5, Insightful)
It always bothers me when a news report talks about the strategic future of things, when the reporter makes a fairly fundamental mistake to show that he/she isn't really all that familiar with the subject matter. The comment that implies that Treo 700s don't support bluetooth, plus the statement about how Palm stopped selling the 650 in Europe because of standards incompatibility, show that 1, the reporter (Marc Jones) isn't familiar with Palm software, and 2, doesn't get that older phones won't be compatible with new standards, and that it's not a bad thing when sales of them stops, when there's a new phone on the block anyways that IS compatible.
I know they're both kind of minor points, but what I hate is how it casts a shadow of doubt on the whole article. It seems like the reporter is out of touch, and so I wonder what else may be wrong that I don't know well enough to spot.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
As an owner of a new Treo 650p (about a month now) I've been quite pleased with it. It doesn't do Wifi, and that's a bit disappointing, but so far I haven't really missed it. As a Palm it's a good unit, as a phone it works well, and having them combined is a nice convenience. Battery life's been (
KISS! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
I've used a Treo650 since November last year. It does not easily work. It's unstable, the bluetooth is shitty, the network connectivity lacks wifi (onboard doesn't bother me, but they crippled it so the sdio card won't work), the phone app itself sucks ass... It works, but barely.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
No, crippled. There has been some work to get the Wifi card to work, and in fact by manipulating the HAL tables a little you can get the T|X network stack to work (bluetooth, wifi, PPP) -- at least in theory... this was crippled on purpose to keep the cell carriers happy.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I am not sure why people have such an obsession with Wi-Fi on treo. While I do think it can be fun to play with, I do not think it overall adds much valu
Re: (Score:2)
My Treo replacement has onboard wi-fi, in addition to standard GSM, 3G (whatever protocol that uses) and bluetooth.
In London for four days a couple of weeks ago, with a non-wifi capable company laptop, I used my phone for all my net access over an open hotspot (we presume provided by the company hosting us - 13 floors up it's unlikely to be the coffee shop down the street).
Phone + wifi = internet without mobile phone company charges. Given I'm on a $7/MB data plan (but 50 minutes a day free voice calls) wif
Re: (Score:2)
-Em
Re: (Score:1)
the unusual thing was having any laptop with me at all. A $500 phone is cheaper than a $500 phone + a $500 laptop + a $30 wifi dongle and considerably easier to carry.
I almost always have my phone on me. I almost never carry a laptop around. I almost always want email access (although in reality I can go anything up to 18 hours without
~ced
Re: (Score:2)
Will they fix the hardware problems? (Score:4, Interesting)
These problems have been in the treo's cince the 600 and still are not resolved.
Another model? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is it Palm or the actual cariers that block this? I would think it is the carriers that decide this.
-Em
Re: (Score:1)
Wouldn't trust this article (Score:4, Informative)
Windows Mobile? What happened to BeOS? (Score:3, Interesting)
It's too bad the BeOS technology will just be lost inside Palm.. I'm sure there is little chance of them open sourcing the code instead of just letting it die.
Re:Windows Mobile? What happened to BeOS? (Score:4, Informative)
Palm became PalmOne (hardware) and PalmSource (software). Then PalmOne bought out the Palm name from PalmSource who were subsequently bought by Access. While most comments here are discussing the future of the Palm company, I am far more interested in seeing the future of the Access/PalmSource company and whether they can make their ambitious Linux plans pay off for them and for hardware manufacturers who might license their upcoming OS. The short story being that the next PalmSource system should allow existing Palm applications and new applications based on the Free Software layers to both operate together. In the past both IBM and Sony have licensed Palm software, perhaps the new Linux based system will have them both re-inventing portable/handheld/pda/???? with the support of a software company with no competing hardware interests.
As for BeOS, I suspect anything from it got lost in the still-born PalmOS 6. Perhaps Access/PalmSource (assuming they have it) could be convinced to release it as Free Software, they had already adopted Eclipse + prc-tools etc as a build chain and are moving to Linux as a kernel so they are familiar with the idea of using Free Software.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
They also had reference hardware on display. It was an XScale board in a clear lucite box (about the size of a laptop) with a cable going up to a screen inset into a similarly large panel. So, not at all a miniaturization mock up or proof of concept (not really n
700p no camera? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Another inaccuracy (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
My wife has a 700p and it doesn't crash much, though the only apps she regularly uses are Blazer, Bejeweled, and the phone. I'm interested in a custom ROM to get rid of the crap that Sprint installed by default, GetBC (business connection) and GetGood (whatever that is). I'd also like the ability to use downloaded files as freely as I choose. Sometimes downloade
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Why I just bought a Treo 700p (Score:5, Informative)
I wanted:
* Synchronization with Outlook at work.
* A data service faster than the T610's GPRS.
* A keyboard.
* Small size.
* If possible, keep using my large library of Palm OS applications.
Yes, there's no question that the Palm OS is aging fast; there's a reason why Palm OS 5.4.9 is nicknamed FrankenGarnet. However, in my mind, it's still the best choice:
* Windows Mobile (such as in the Treo 700w) - What's the point of preemptive multitasking if the user interface and phone aspects of the device are awful? The 700w's 240x240 resolution is inferior to the Treo's 320x320, anyway; text on the latter looks *great* when using a replacement TrueType-based font and FontSmoother.
* Symbian OS - I know that Symbian, thanks to its EPOC ancestry, is one fantastic piece of work. However, even if (as another poster noted) one can use Python to develop for it, in practice the third-party development community is a fraction of that for the Palm OS. The one S60-based device that has the display resolution I'd want, the N90, is a $600 GSM-only camera-hybrid monster that still doesn't come with a keyboard. And what's with the multiple, mutually-incompatible OS iterations (S60 v2, S60v3, S90, etc., etc.)? I can still run Palm OS applications I started using on my first Pilot 1000 from March 1997.
By contrast, my Treo 700p gives me:
* The same solid out-of-the-box synchronization with Outlook as with my previous PDAs. Having been able to keep around every calendar and contact entry I've made since that first Pilot 1000 is not only convenient but invaluable.
* EV-DO. It's fast enough for emergency logging into work through Windows Terminal Server with my notebook, something that "slower than 28.8K dialup" GPRS certainly couldn't do. Sprint's EV-DO network is up and rolling in 200 US metro areas.
* A tiny, but quite usable, keyboard.
* A very pocketable form factor. I'm a guy, and have no desire to start carrying a Tribbianish man-bag to carry one of those Nokia monster phones. Although the T610 and UX50 were together not hard to carry in one pocket (it helps to be a six-footer), the 700p is easier still.
* As mentioned above, access to the entire gigantic library of Palm OS applications.
* An unexpected bonus: With Sprint's PCS Business Connection service, I have push access to my work mail, meaning that the 700p has *also* replaced my BlackBerry. It's not quite as elegant as a BlackBerry, but is still quite usable. Besides, it looks like within a few months I'll be able to use either GoodLink or BlackBerry connect to make the process even more seamless.
That said, I'll be dismayed if my next phone/PDA isn't some kind of Linux- or some other modern OS-based platform. I don't care whether it's Symbian, Palm 6 Cobalt, the Qtopia Greenphone I saw at LinuxWorld, something Nokia 770-based, something Sharp Zaurus-based, etc., etc., as long as it has the above features. (Of course, I said this before purchasing the UX50, and the PDA before that, too.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
It's not the 300K of the latest and greatest, but it's free and it's anywhere you can get a signal
Short wish list (Score:2)
1. Wi-Fi support. I'd love to be able to hook into a Skype/Gizmo Project client and just start talking without worrying about my minutes in my home or other Wi-Fi locations. That, and it would be better internet.
2. True Blackberry support. Right now through Sprint they have some Exchange hook in thing wh
Treo 650 rocks (Score:1)
I used to use a Palm (when it was a 'Pilot'), and carry a phone, but moved to the Treo 600 to eliminate having to carry around 2 devices. I never looked back.
When I was looking for a new phone i looked at other devices as well as the Treo. Most 'phones'
Re: (Score:1)
Switching to Windows (Score:1)
Its gotta be better than the 700w (Score:2)
I'm satisfied with my 700w. Given that my company paid for all of but a few bucks of the phone. My other option was a generic WinMob5 phone that many people I work with hate to the point they're trading them in on standard phones.
I'm o
Hope SCO doesn't ruin them first (Score:2)
On the one hand, there are probably a lot