Non-Profit to Run Boston Wi-Fi? 104
isabotage3 writes to tell us that Boston, MA is toying with a somewhat unique approach to their version of the city-wide low-cost wireless network. Rather than put the network in the hands of a private organization under contract the city may allow a non-profit group to run the show. From the article: "Although Boston's strategy depends on the willingness of foundations and businesses to come forward with cash donations, officials believe having an existing or newly formed nonprofit in charge is the best way to ensure the project meets its civic goals and steers clear of special interests."
non-profit != non-private (Score:3, Insightful)
non-profit + non-gov't == good idea (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:non-profit != non-private (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Agh!! (Score:1)
This isn't looking so good... (Score:2, Funny)
It's very possible, although not certain. (Score:5, Interesting)
But there are lots of foundations and philanthropists out there with lots of money, and all you really need is one. I've worked in the non-profit sector. The good news is that people with money understand using money to catalyze change: that's what investment is after all. In fact, that's the difference between asking for a small donation and a large one. You can ask for a small thing because it will help you get something worthy done. You can ask for a large thing if will change the way things get done.
By their nature these sort of asks are unique animals. You need to research the donor, understand the foundation's mission or the donor's interests, and connect what you want to do to those things in a persuasive way. Only after you have done those things can you say whether the funding is likely or even possible.
With respect to business, consider all the businesses that provide wi-fi access. Why do they do it? To attract customers from their competition. So, these businesses are going to be either against the effort, or indifferent to it.
But the principle remains: a business may be interested in this because it attracts customers away from the competition. Except that the service would be for everyone in the city. So you need a business that is interested in the city vis a vis other cities.
You want a real estate business.
If this goes down, the most plausible way to do it will be to find some developer who has a mega-project that, as such projects do, requires a boatload of zoning variances. Normally you sit down and dicker with them over things like setting aside jobs for city residences, putting in amenities to offset problems, and, this is key, paying for improvements nearby infrastructure. Most of these things are the stuff the developer doesn't want to do, or is indifferent to. However, ubiquitous wireless may be, for some projects, a big plus.
Maybe you're putting in a development with room for a hundred stores and office space for a hundred businesses. The free infrastructure might save each store and business a hundred dollars a more in infrastruture costs. Thats 200 businesses x 100 dollars/month or 20,000 per month, nearly a quarter million per year. Using the prime rate, the present value of a quarter million per year is about a million dollars. So chipping in a million dollars is a break even proposition for you. If it's a condition of building your project, you could perhaps be persuaded to contribute more, and may be more creative in finding ways to leverage the infrastructure to make more money.
Re:This isn't looking so good... (Score:2)
"Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation"
I know... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I know... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I know... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I know... (Score:2)
Re:I know... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I know... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I know... (Score:1)
Boston infrastructure... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Boston infrastructure... (Score:2)
Re:Boston infrastructure... (Score:1)
Re:Boston infrastructure... (Score:1)
It's designed to keep the British from invading.
Re:Boston infrastructure... (Score:1)
Re:Boston infrastructure... (Score:2)
Ugh (Score:5, Insightful)
10-1 in about a decade we'll here stories about how these things were fraught with corruption, never worked right, waste of taxpayer money, etc, etc.
Voice of experience.. I spent years at an ISP that tried to sell wireless and man, it just never ever works right for this type of thing (others in the industry will probably confirm this) without spending a whole lot of cash.
Re:Ugh (Score:2)
Re:Ugh (Score:4, Interesting)
we use a wireless connection which is line of sight microwave as a seondary connection and it has better uptime than our MCI t1.. (then again it is MCI.....)
Re:Ugh (Score:2)
From memory the link ran about 2mbps. Except when it rained, and throughput dropped a good 50%+, depending on the severity of the rain.
Re:Ugh (Score:2)
I'm about 3.5 miles from their base station. Rain doesn't seem to affect things, but heavy snow causes a slight increase in ping time (presumably due to retransmits) but not enough to really be noticable without timing it.
Re:Ugh (Score:1)
Re:Ugh (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Ugh (Score:3, Interesting)
they have gotten a lot better..
Re:Ugh (Score:2)
Of course... it's also expensive as all holy heck (but, comparable in the price to a t1 depending on where you are at in the country/equipment).
Re:Ugh (Score:2)
Re:Ugh (Score:2)
Re:Ugh (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Ugh (Score:1, Funny)
b/g = cheap! (Score:2)
Re:Ugh (Score:1)
Confirmed.
Wi-Fi was designed from the ground up as a short range physical layer protocol. With longer ranges, you have to take a lot of different extras in account, such as automatic power adjustment depending on the distance of a connection from a tower etc, which protocols like 3
Re:Ugh (Score:1, Troll)
I know this sounds cliche, but it is true. With the gazillion FOR profit businesses out there, if municipal wifi made sense from a cost/benefit perspective anywhere on a wide scale, businesses would fall all over themselves to offer it. May with the "N" standard, it'll make sense (if businesses have a really good way to keep leechers off), then it is fine for cities to step in.
OTOH thi
Totally wrong (Score:3, Insightful)
I know this sounds cliche, but it is true. With the gazillion FOR profit businesses out there, if municipal wifi made sense from a cost/benefit perspective anywhere on a wide scale, businesses would fall all over themselves to offer it.
Er... the city gives it away for free because they fund it via other means (taxes, etc). A busines would have to charge. Your whole idea falls apart right there - I am *not* going to pay $20 a month for something I may use two days out of 30. BUt if its free and there, hey,
Re:Ugh (Score:2)
'Cause if so, congrats, you're subsidizing the Dig.
Not that I'm proud of it, it's just that I feel that my fellow Americans should understand that no matter where you are, the Federal government is screwing you. Moving to another state won't help any more...
Re:Ugh (Score:1)
Re:Ugh (Score:2, Informative)
As I understand it (I've got the task force report in front of me, but have not yet read it), they plan to use much of the dark fiber capacity as the backbone, and are looking for about $20M for the equipment buildout. The city wi
Re:Ugh (Score:2)
They'd actually be far better waiting for 802.11n (which was, you know, actually sortof designed for this problem) than trying to force a/b/g to work with it.
Re:Ugh (Score:1)
Here we go again! (Score:5, Insightful)
WIIFB (Score:5, Insightful)
While it is nice to think that businesses will just donate the money to the project, 99% of businesses want to know what the benefit to their bottom line is. There is an incentive to businesses to provide local wireless, as it draws people to their location. There is also incentive if they get some public recognition - think advertising. Yes, some do it for "goodwill" but I don't see that being as big a factor in a city like Boston, (as opposed to a smaller town), where there are a lot of businesses competing for the same goodwill. That means businesses are going to want to run their ads in return for their donations, making for an annoying wireless environment.
I think it would have been a great idea 7 years ago where companies were spending money on anything to do with tech, but I think will fail in today's economic climate.
Re:WIIFB (Score:3, Funny)
National Public Radio (Score:2)
Re:WIIFB (Score:3, Insightful)
What's in it for business?
I don't think this will be a hard sell, depending upon the implementation. It is not all that different from our county's wireless project which has not had problems pulling together funding from local universities, real estate agencies, businesses, and private donors.
Re:WIIFB (Score:1)
Something new ? (Score:5, Insightful)
The best example is the city of Lausanne, Olympic Capital. There are many Wi-Fi access point at each main squares. The provider is SIL service multimédia, a department of the Industrial Services (belonging to the city) which is clearly non-profit organization.
So, there is definitely no revolution!
More infos:
Re:Something new ? (Score:1)
There is some competition because of the ADSL wich is supported by many other provider(Swisscom [swisscom.com] or Sunrise [sunrise.ch]). ADSL broadband is a bit more expensive than Cable.
In city, there is independant provider, managed by the city itself. This is the main advantage.
Big Brother (Score:5, Interesting)
On the contrary, perhaps. (Score:2)
Sometimes it's easier to stand up and do the Good Thing when you don't have a giant profit motive to get in the way.
Also, although I'm no adv
Re:Big Brother (Score:2)
Government-driven non-profits that keep everything secret, like a typical corporation, are easily manipulated but then they're often pork-barrel affairs from the outset - a way of shifting money to people for political reasons.
(Non-governme
Re:Big Brother (Score:1)
Also, since Municipal WiFi is about giving Internet access to the people, a non-profit is a logical choice because the people will be more inclined to support it. Of course, it would have to be well-managed to garner and keep that support, b
Why businesses and foundations? (Score:3, Insightful)
As with most things, if this is really something people want, they will be willing to chip in and help pay for it.
If some non-profit in my town were planning something like this, I'd probably donate to it.
Re:Why businesses and foundations? (Score:1)
A lot of communities have done that.
They incorporate a group so there is a not for profit entity to carry it and give it a goal and ways of looking after members,
and then people start to build it and share information about building nodes and hooking up.
Re:Why businesses and foundations? (Score:2)
Wikipedia and the Ubuntu foundation are non-profit organizations, but have nothing to do with any government agency.
Red Cross... Salvation Army... These groups have founders, board of directors, and technically a group of people that "own" (perhaps manage is a better term) the non-profit organization.
Re:Why businesses and foundations? (Score:2)
This is a great idea! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:This is a great idea! (Score:2)
This non profit will be selling access to their network directly to companies like Comcast.
Nonprofits aren't better than corporations (Score:4, Insightful)
People that think that nonprofits avoid the issues that corporations face need to look at OIC in Milwaukee. Lots of corruption and wasted money for something that was a good idea gone wrong.
I'd much rather see open competition between private corporations for city-wide wireless access. Due to competition, it's far more likely to be high quality and low cost for end users.
Re:Nonprofits are better at public infrastructure (Score:1)
Privatisation has not done much for power infrastructure.
There are a number of successful existing community wireless networks around the world.
Not in their best interest (Score:5, Insightful)
Free Wi-Fi Equals Cencorship.... (Score:3, Insightful)
It is paid for by tax payers.
Anything paid for by taxpayers is subjected to government scrutiny and control. Sooner or later the government agency in charge of the local wi-fi will start to exert control over what is defined as "obcene" or "offensive". When offensive material is found, it will be banned.
First thing will be "no child pr0n", followed by no "regular pr0n", followed by "no [whatever we feel is a bad thing]....
It will only take a few elections before who ever is in charge will decide what is deemed as "viewable".
Sooner or later the "opposition" will be "unviewable".
The government "SHOULD NOT BE" in control of any medium related to speech.
I do not trust my government anymore....
Re:Free Wi-Fi Equals Cencorship.... (Score:1)
Re:Free Wi-Fi Equals Cencorship.... (Score:2)
Re:Free Wi-Fi Equals Cencorship.... (Score:1)
Re:Free Wi-Fi Equals Cencorship.... (Score:2)
Well, good thing that we have corporations, who provide us internet access with no controls whatsoever and would never, ever, restrict what we do with it.
Too bad that is illegal in Texas... (Score:1)
Special Interest Shenanigans (Score:2)
Earth to the do-gooders, a nonprofit is just as special interest as anyone else, potentially more so, as by labeling itself a non-profit, it automatically deflects scrutiny and skepticism.
The Museum of Science?? (Score:4, Insightful)
The Science Museum (which it is called by many) has been around for a while. It has been very non-controversal (at least since my childhood in the 60's growing up in Winchester and going to the museum almost every week for the shows). It is also, IMHO, very non-political.
I am not aware of any scandals or controversy that involved the Science Museum.
They are also very technially savvy; they's been teaching science for all these years, including some of my own education in electronics.
Perhaps the most important attribute is that they have deep, solid roots in the area. They have quietly outlasted other institutions (and politicians) in the area. The Science Museum is one of those institutions that would be still standing even after the rest of Boston caves in and collapses.
The mayor should realise that if he turned the keys of this project over to the Museum of Science, they would have a lot to lose if they did a f**k up on this.
Luv
Cleara
Re:The Museum of Science?? (Score:2)
Thanks to the Mass. Turnpike Authority, this theory might be tested soon.
Who says they'd want it? (Score:2)
Frankly something like this could go south in a hurry. There are a huge number of uncertainties, ranging from sheer technical feasibility (that's one of the easy questions) to much more complex issues of maintainance budgeting, operating a huge service fleet, and all the associated
Re:Who says they'd want it? (Score:2)
hmm (Score:2)
My condolences to all Bostonians (Score:1)
Air-Stream.org is way ahead of you =) (Score:2, Interesting)
Air-Stream.org is one in Adelaide Australia, but yay for Bostonians starting a new project.
http://air-stream.org/ [air-stream.org]
Wow. Have a shot at it and let us know (Score:2)
Boston has bigger problems (Score:1)
Non-profit municipal wifi already up and running.. (Score:1)
Not Free! Read TFA! (Score:2)
Furthermore...
Backhaul Only (Score:1)
Free of Special Interests? - Not in Massachusetts (Score:1)
About any Massachusetts initiative
You can look at your history books and recent newspapers and know that NOTHING is free of political special interests in Boston.
The Mayor seems