Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Liquid Cooled X1900 XTX Card Reviewed

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:27 PM
from the big-barrel-of-oil-so-much-more-fun dept.
Graphics Software Hardware
An anonymous reader writes "TrustedReview's Andrew Miller has posted a review of the new liquid cooled Radeon X1900 XTX card. There have been a few reviews floating around based on engineering samples of this product, but it sounds like the actual card turned out to be quite a sight to behold." From the review: "If you are seriously considering buying an X1900 XTX, then it is well worth paying the extra money for this card as the noise reduction is dramatic. The extra performance is just an added bonus. However, the 7950 GX2 is simultaneously faster and quieter for the same money. The X1900 XTX on the other hand has the option of HDR and FSAA as well as the possibility of running in Crossfire (assuming you can get hold of a similarly cooled master card).
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Liquid Cooled X1900 XTX Card Reviewed 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.

  • But. . . (Score:3, Insightful)

    by kimvette (919543) on Monday July 03 2006, @10:31PM (#15654396) Homepage
    Is there a usable Linux driver to accompany that card when it's released? Yeah I know I know, the core gaming market is Windows, but some Linux users DO want fast video cards.
    • I don't mean to sound trollish (ok, maybe just a bit), but given ATI's track record, I doubt there's a reliable Windows driver for this card. And in all seriousness, what would you need to run in Linux that requires such a high end video card. Personally, I think it's just a bit overkill for Tux Racer.
      • Doom 3, Unreal Tournament, CS (via wine), games that run in cedega.. there might not be a slew of games for Linux and I know I'm missing some, but there are great ports out there that the troll community just likes to ignore for their own sake.

      • Universities (Score:2, Interesting)

        by sowth (748135) *
        I imaging plenty of universities use 3D acceleration in Linux for their work, among other places. Then again, they probably use one of the BSDs or Unix...
      • Oh come on! If you used ATI cards in the 1999-2001 timeframe, you'd practically worship their current crop of Windows drivers. They are a VAST improvement over what ATI used to pawn off on customers.

      • I don't mean to sound trollish (ok, maybe just a bit), but given ATI's track record, I doubt there's a reliable Windows driver for this card.


        Sometimes I wonder if "faulty drivers" isn't an excuse for actually sub-par hardware... How can anyone tell?
      • Agreed. Let's see a stable Windows driver before we start screaming for Linux
    • I'd be happy if ATI released an Xorg 7.1 compatible driver; I've had to mask Xorg 7.1 in Gentoo since I run Xgl and need the proprietary driver. To be fair, ATI tends to be relatively quick in supporting their latest cards with their Linux drivers. For example when I got my Dell D610 with the mobile X300 in Feb. 2005 (the D610 was one of the first machines with the new PCIe vid cards on a laptop), there was a compatible binary driver within a month. Unfortunately, the driver had a bug and hung on systems

    • Just ignore ATI (Score:5, Interesting)

      by idonthack (883680) <idonthack.gmail@com> on Monday July 03 2006, @11:34PM (#15654605)
      Any time I look at buying a card, ATI gets completely ignored because Nvidia's Linux support is so much better.

    • Re:But. . . (Score:5, Interesting)

      by mcpkaaos (449561) on Monday July 03 2006, @11:41PM (#15654633)
      Is there a usable Linux driver

      As long as you plan on staying with Xorg 6.8.x, you should be fine. Anything greater and you might be one of the many, many people (myself included) who suffer hard lock-ups when X shuts down or you switch VTs while X is running. I have tried many combinations of kernels and versions of fglrx against a couple versions of Xorg (6.8.2 and modular), and only 6.8.2 was stable. YMMV, but this has been a fairly common issue for a number of folks. Although this makes it sound like Xorg is the problem, I don't believe it is. IIRC, someone over at the Gentoo forums traced it to a call made within the driver.

      I've since given up on running modular X with my ATI card and chose to mask it until my next upgrade (which will be NVidia, no doubt). It's been a month or two, so this may have been fixed (though I doubt it). If anyone has an update on that, please do tell.

      Good luck. :)
    • There may very well be, however it won't last long.
      ATI have a new policy of pulling support for their products even while they're still selling new in the stores. They recently dropped support of the R200 ( see http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=3385 6 854 [rage3d.com] ).

      This may be marked as a troll, and maybe this wouldn't be out of line, but I still warn you:

      Do not buy ATI products if you use or intend to use Linux . Otherwise you will be sorry.

          • Step 2: Rant and rave as the driver continues to suck ass like every other ATI driver.

            I decided to try ATI again after years of avoiding them because of their drivers.

            I discovered that ATI still can't write drivers, a decade later.

            I decided to put ATI off for another decade.

            ALL ATI's drivers are poop, whether they're for Windows or Linux. People who buy an ATI card deserve what they get - headaches.

  • ...how are the latest Linux drivers coming along?

    Oh, well. Looks like a neat card, too bad it's still slower than the top of the line nVidia board. Expensive as all hell too!

    Maybe once they get the liquid cooling thing down we'll see a good bump in clock speed.

    ---

    http://www.burningserver.com/ [burningserver.com], for all your blank web page needs!

  • Shocking metal nips. (Score:3, Funny)

    by LordOfTheNoobs (949080) on Monday July 03 2006, @10:42PM (#15654439) Homepage
    As you can see, he was truly shocked [trustedreviews.com].

    / probably at his sweet new ability to render metal nips [trustedreviews.com]
    // i believe these figures from the article specify metal nipple rendering in the tera-nip range. [trustedreviews.com]
    ///totally sweet

  • Assuming... (Score:5, Funny)

    by knifeyspooney (623953) on Monday July 03 2006, @10:57PM (#15654502)
    assuming you can get hold of a similarly cooled master card

    Indeed, my MasterCard will need some cooling off time after I purchase one of these babies.

  • Mainstream liquid cooling. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by A Nun Must Cow Herd (963630) on Monday July 03 2006, @10:59PM (#15654515)
    I'd rather see such cooling techniques used to make silent mid-range cards with good performance, rather than having it only available with hideously expensive high end cards.

  • Pathetic. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by bronney (638318)
    Went and looked at the OC results and well, it's like nil. Why bother with watercooling when you can't squeeze more clocks out of it. I believe the vid fan isn't the noisest part in the box?
    • Moving parts in my computer:

      1. hard drive platters
      2. hard drive heads
      3. keys on keyboard
      4. mouse
      5. speaker cones, as desired
      6. DVD

      That's it. Not even the power switch moves, as it is a capacitative switch that just senses the presence of my finger.

      I intend to fix the hard drive problem. At least I got rid of the ball bearings with the last upgrade. I think I can cram all my stuff onto a 20 GB solid state device. That will run cooler, and the failures will be sector-by-sector instead of everything at once.

      Wh
      • Well done. I'm lamenting the fact that, due to a desire to play Oblivion, I now have two fans in my system instead of one. (The system fan is undervolted Nexus 120 mm - very quite. I've replaced the heatsink on my 6600GT GPU with a Zalman VF700 and undervolted the fan, but its still the loudest thing in my system. Previous GPU used a passive Zalman heatsink.)

        It is good to have people like you around - it makes me feel that I'm not obsessive. :-)
        • The Zalman VF700 has "Silent and Normal fan speed settings. The Silent plug uses 5V power and spins the fan at 1,350 RPM, while the Normal setting uses 12V power and cranks the fan up to 2,650 RPM." (TechReport.com)

          Why do you need to undervolt the fan further? Are you so cramped for space that you can't put your computer on the floor where 1,350 RPM should be silent?
          • Anything under 12V is undervolted. As it happens, I'm using a different undervolting adapter than the one provided with the unit for space and asthetics reasons.
            • Anything under 12V is undervolted.

              I suppose that's one way to define it. I would say undervolting means providing less voltage than the device recommends or was meant to get. Since my CPU fan came with resistors to output 6V, 8V, or 10V, I don't see that as undervolting unless I go below 6V.
    • Thats the point, the video card fan shouldn't be the noisiest fan in a system, unfortunately a X1900XTX fan is.
    • With proper water cooling i'm able to run @ 780/890 on these with only soft modifications. With hard voltage modifications these cards will do a lot more. (25-30% out of spec) Of course, from a value proposition it is all a waste of money, but it is fun to tinker. I don't think this is a good 'value proposition' either. Middle of the road is the best I suppose.

  • Energy consumption (Score:5, Interesting)

    by tsa (15680) on Tuesday July 04 2006, @12:02AM (#15654688) Homepage
    I always wonder what the energy consumption for water cooling is compared to air cooling. Does anyone know anything about that?

    • It's a fairly trivial difference (Score:4, Informative)

      by Sycraft-fu (314770) on Tuesday July 04 2006, @02:54AM (#15655111)
      Water cooling pumps don't need a lot of wattage to run, neither do air cooling fans. In general water cooling probably uses slightly more power since usually the water cooling radiator is air cooled, so you've fans and a pump. However it's just not a significant amount of power next to the other draws in the system.

      Rememeber all the power is needed for is moving things around, either air or water. There's not a compressor or anything.

  • The Playstation 3's price is outrageous... (Score:5, Funny)

    by vijayiyer (728590) on Tuesday July 04 2006, @12:57AM (#15654814)
    So I'll get a video card instead.
    • I believe it was in reference to running both HDR and AA at the same time. I don't know if this has been resolved since last I checked, but that was the advantage to having ATI as far as I could tell.
      • nVidia implemented their pipline in such a way that one part does both, or maybe only one of them can be on at the same time, so they are mutually exclusive. Arguable how much difference it makes since, in general, HDR uses power to the point you've not got enough left over for AA without too much framerate loss. However, in an SLI configuration you do, and that might be one of the only reasons to spend such an amazing amount of money.
    • NVidia is not "officially" supporting SLI for the 7950. This card has 2 GPUs so it is effectively an SLI card on one board. This has huge advantages over traditional SLI since it requires less power and cooling and affords greater speed due to the shortened data paths. Also, of course, it's far less expensive than a pair of 7900GTXes.

      "Officially" being the operative word, NVidia is working with some high profile builders (i.e. Alienware) for dual and quad SLI solutions with the 7950. NVidia has state
    • Both ATI and Nvidia are going to be making DX10 cards this fall. New games that will truly require a next-gen card are coming out before the holiday season. Vista is coming out sometime in 2007. All the performance from here on out is going to be geared to DX10, so it isn't worth it working on pumping up the power on DX9 cards. Obviously, DX9 users will see advancements with DX10 cards, but the point is sort of that games in two years won't run on DX9 cards, so releasing stronger DX9 cards now is silly.
    • They are suggesting buying this card over an equivalently powered, but air-cooled, card. Thus, even if the performance were the same, you should get this - but the performance is actually better, (because it can be clocked higher due to the cooling) so thats the added bonus.

      That said, Id personally take a hit to performance for a passively cooled card any day.
    • I have an excellent graphics card called the ATI Rage 128. I run at 1600x1024, 24bit color, which means no 3D at all.

      It doesn't heat the room. It has no moving parts. (neither does the heat sink on my CPU -- damn hard drive moves though, until I replace it with solid state)

      I'm completely happy with my video card. I will remain happy... until a Linux desktop requires a god-damn 3D accelerator just to display a few dozen xterm windows and a dozen Firefox windows. There is absolutely no reason I should ever ne
      • How long did it take you to be okay with overlapping windows? Sorry to bring up a sore subject.
        • Prior to the mid-1990s, I just used the Linux
          text console. 80x25 was OK for browsing the web
          with lynx.

          And yes, there were porno videos. There is a
          great one out there called dirty.vt (google
          will find it) that plays well at 9600 baud in an
          80x24 xterm. On a Linux box with a 100 HZ clock,
          the following code does a decent job of playing
          it at the right speed:

          #include <unistd.h>
          #include <stdio.h>
          #include <stdlib.h>
          #include <string.h>

          int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
          int buf;
          whil
      • Surely you know that people use these for video games. Right?
        • I've heard that people use these for video games. A game console would be more appropriate, or you could actually go outside to play with other humans, but OK... whatever.

          What gets to me is that all the new OS software (Vista, MacOX X, X.org) is designed to run 2D stuff through the 3D pipeline. I don't want a space heater in my computer. My video card is perfectly fine for 2D. Apparently the 3D cards are not! Recent gamer cards have supposedly done such a bad job with 2D that it is actually faster to run 2D

          • Then there are the bad jokes like see-through windows, which we all get stuck with because somebody thought it was l33t.

            I love translucent windows. I wish I could set the opacity of any window arbitrarily. It's incredibly useful when you're either copying text or using one window as a reference while writing in another.

            I've also never had any noise or problems from the Radeon 9600 in my desktop machine, which has issues playing the latest games but which can do transparency and OS-level 3d effects with

            • I had a bit of trouble understanding your "copying text or using one window as a reference while writing in another" comment, because it just doesn't make sense... until I realized that your window manager settings are probably click-to-focus and raise-on-focus.

              Switch to focus-follows-mouse and autoraise disabled. This should be trivial for a Linux box. For Windows XP or Vista, I think you need to look for a "tweakUI" tool that Microsoft has available for download.

              Now, put the window you want to read on top
      • Hey I have a similar card - on my Linux machine, think it's a nVidia something 64MB. It runs without the nvidia kernel driver too, simply because I never bothered to install it. That's great, if that's all you need. I got a feeling that every time there's a new hardware article someone have to put it down. It's like an article about sewing machines, and a comment that says "What's wrong with needle and thread?" or an article about the latest cool car and say "What's wrong with an old Ford? Gets me from A to
        • There is a certain unfairness here. Gamers are dragging business-like users into buying hardware that is more expensive, more failure-prone because of the heat and moving parts, power wasting, and noisy. The high-end performance of a few years back could be had today without any moving parts. Moving parts fail, take more energy to run, and make noise.

          Even if you do have the fancy card, it will run cooler (and thus last longer and save energy) if you avoid making it render silly compositing effects all the t
    • I sleep in the same room as my PC stands, so noise is a very important factor. I don't like to turn my PC off and as I only HAVE one room where I can place the PC. I can't place the PC in another room as that one is too moist.

      (And no, I don't live with anybody else. My studio is just two rooms. Bathroom and living/sleep/kooking area.)
    • http://www.silentpcreview.com/ [silentpcreview.com] A few thousand people there seem to think noise is more important than performance.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.