Chinese Company Produces $150 Linux PC 325
srinravi writes to mention an Ars Technica article about another ambitious 'inexpensive computer' project. A Chinese manufacturer, YellowSheepRiver, is aiming to make available a $150 Linux PC built with inexpensive hardware components. From the article: "Urging potential customers to 'Say no to Wintel,' YellowSheepRiver is devoted to using its own Linux distribution and hardware designed and manufactured by Chinese companies. YellowSheepRiver hopes to close the "digital divide" by making computer technology available to the Chinese public at an affordable price. The Municator, which comes with 256MB of RAM, uses a unique 64-bit CPU with an instruction set based on a subset of the MIPS architecture. Designed by a Chinese company called BLX, the the cheap chip is clocked at 400 or 600MHZ and supposedly provides performance comparable to that of an Intel P3."
How much is how much? (Score:5, Interesting)
Basically, how much is $150 to the average chinese citizen?
Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curreny (Score:5, Informative)
The unique feature is a 64 bit RISC chip and S-video out for a TV interface. No need for a computer monitor.
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:2, Informative)
Have you ever tried using a TV as a monitor using S-Video? If you're not using software specifically designed for it (MythTV/Media Center) then it's all but useless. The signal from S-Video is in some respects like a low resolution VGA signal, but it's very sloppy in comparison, smearing the pixels across a comparitively wide area. It's fine for graphics and very large print on things like buttons, but it just isnt' accurate enough to make legible text unless that text is
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:3, Insightful)
People who already have a TV?
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:2)
Maybe new TVs come standard with S-Video now, but as I said a low-end VGA monitor would be just as cheap and offer at least double the resolution.
If you can only affort one... (Score:2)
But you can't watch TV on it (not without an expensive TV-to-VGA box anyway). If you can only afford to buy one, you buy the one that can do both. Kinda like the old days with the Commodore 64, it was a good way to get your parents to buy you a TV for your room.
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:5, Informative)
(Please restrain yourselves from flaming about Linspire, TigerDirect, Celeron, etc.... this IS a CHEAP machine. It does, however, show what can be done at the low end of the market.)
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:2)
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:2)
So... you can get the same machine for $50 more with one difference: A Celeron instead of the non-intel processor. If the almost-MIPS thing has the power benifits that I'd expect it to have, then for the rural chinese market it could easily be the better deal.
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:2)
http://www.netaffilia.com/ad/electronics/frys/i/2
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:2)
Can the Chinese people that this is actually intended for also do so?
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:2)
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:2)
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:5, Insightful)
They see no need to be tied to the X86 ISA.
It makes a lot of sense in that it helps China become more independent of the West and possible make the west more dependant on China.
You want to sell systems to the Chinese government? Someday it may have to have a Chinese CPU in it.
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:3, Insightful)
That is fine for exports. China makes lots of stuff for export that it wouldn't sell in China. The difference is anything sold in China with an Intel or AMD CPU and Windows involves money leaving China. If it exported then it is a net gain.
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:3, Informative)
That's IN ADDITION to normal VGA. I live in Hong Kong, you can get used 14 or 15" CRT monitors free, people are throwing them out all over to get LCD screens. You can buy them in a PC junk shop for US$3. Bigger monitors ar absurdly cheap too if you have the deskspace.
The full specs of the PC are here. [yellowsheepriver.org] The video specs:
ATI Radeon 7000-M
33MHz 32-bit PCI
Internalized with 16MB DDR RAM buffers
Support VGA port & S-Video output
It's real
Re:How much is how much? (Score:5, Informative)
The graph on this page [iiasa.ac.at] confirms the ~2200 Yuan for rural households and shows urban households at just more than double that of rural.
So, from 3 to 6 months net income for an average household.
Re:How much is how much? (Score:2)
Then there are families that pool their resources... very common when you get to the dirt poor. Houses with 4 families in them are common. Why not pool their resources and get a communal PC? It's not as off-the-wall as you make it sound.
Re:How much is how much? (Score:2)
The question was how much $150 is to the chinese. After finding some data, I answered between 3 to 6 months work. I wasn't making it sound any particular way.
I wrote: So, from 3 to 6 months net income for an average household.
[sarcasm]Boy, there's so much spin on that that I think Bill O'Reilly would be speechless.[/sarcasm]
Re:How much is how much? (Score:3, Insightful)
Ummm...from your own pdf:
Per capita != "household income." And, from your same source (in the same paragraph!):
So, for a urban family of three, their total household income would be $3139 ($327*3.2*3)...so a $150 computer would be ~5% of their total annual household income...
The median US household income is $43318 [google.com]. 5% of that figure is $2165--basically the price at whic
For an Entire Village (Score:2)
Chinese middle class (Score:2)
If you restrict the discussion to the middle class, they are probably making about $10,000 in equivalent US purchasing power- about quarter US median income. That number is a little dicey, because economic sectors vary widely and the Chinese currency is assumed artificially lower than free market
So, when do we get one over here? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:So, when do we get one over here? (Score:2)
Re:MIPS rip chip (Score:2)
But can it run Linux? (Score:3, Interesting)
But can it run (my) Linux?
Too bad it does run Linux (Score:2, Funny)
If they really wanted to make a killing, they'd hamstring the machine to ensure that it could never run Linux, and then the company would make outlandish claims about how Linux will never run on their machine.
Then, there would be a rush of people trying put whatver toaster oven version of Linux on the thing. Within weeks, the free publicity machine would splatter screen shots of those first beautiful lines of [FAILE
Danger for GNU/linux (Score:5, Insightful)
I disagree (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I disagree (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Danger for GNU/linux (Score:2)
Now with built in firewall!! (Score:5, Funny)
I bet this thing filters questionable content right out of the box!
http://religiousfreaks.com/ [religiousfreaks.com]Re:Now with built in firewall!! (Score:2)
Re:Now with built in firewall!! (Score:2)
It is so slow that (Score:3, Funny)
When you watch american kung fu flicks (chuck norris) they automagically get the "out of sync english voiceover" effect.
YellowSheepRiver?? (Score:5, Funny)
don't drink the yellow water.... (Score:4, Funny)
And watch out where the huskies go [N/T] (Score:2)
Re:YellowSheepRiver?? (Score:2)
Why put a drive in there? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Why put a drive in there? (Score:2)
Perhaps that's what it's called the [com]Municator?
Re:Why put a drive in there? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why put a drive in there? (Score:2)
I think it's retarded to design what COULD be a very general-purpose computer with the premise that people are only going to use it for a few specific uses. Witness the demise of dedicated word processing machines and the mediocre reception of web-browser-only Internet terminals for home use.
Re:Why put a drive in there? (Score:2)
The only problem is the current breed of desktop environments and the software that runs on them. They perform poorly, consume far too much memory, and don't work reliably.
2GB flash is *v
Re:Why put a drive in there? (Score:2)
CeBIT 2006 Demo (Score:5, Informative)
here's a demo of the product.
Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo (Score:2)
I hate to break it to you, but Word and Excel are no longer the primary tasks people use computers for. Web browsing and email are.
That said, for people who need to word process or do spreadsheets, this machine is capable of running word processors and spreadsheet apps.
Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo (Score:2)
Why, are you afraid I may go mentally unstable and throw myself from a bridge?
but Word and Excel are no longer the primary tasks people use computers for. Web browsing and email are.
I don't need a computer that looks like a brick for that, for the price of this computer (when you add the monitor, kb and so on) you can get a PDA with a large screen, browsing and e-mail capabilities.
See the video here (Score:5, Informative)
Re:See the video here (Score:2)
That's why I don't post anymore.
BLX allegedly stole MIPS architecture (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.eetimes.com/news/design/business/showA
brand Name? (Score:2, Funny)
Communicator
- Communist
----------------------
Municator
Performance claim probably spot on. (Score:5, Informative)
Even if the MIPS implementation these guys are using is dated and has a teensy cache, 400-600 mhz MIPS would be roughly in the ballpark of a P3... and 64-bit to boot. And have a lot more registers, which makes it easier to write fast code because you dont have to swap things out of your primary (what, four? =P) registers to do anything, like on Intel + friends.
Re:Performance claim probably spot on. (Score:2)
The only thing I'd be afraid of is the fact that it uses a "subset" of the MIPS instruction set. It's not like MIPS is a wildly complex and hard to implement instruction set...
Re:Performance claim probably spot on. (Score:2)
Tired of being cheap (Score:2)
Red Office (Score:2, Insightful)
Chip Design Issues? (Score:2)
Other than that, I'm thinking we might be looking at the next Audrey or something. I'll never figure out why they don't put every piece of documentation on the web and open the box up to the hacker community. Seems straightforward to me, but I'm no marketer (tha
products specs (Score:5, Informative)
Re:products specs (Score:2)
Cool name, YSR-639 (Score:2)
All I could think when I saw the specs was YowSeR, YowSer, YowSer! The Mac Mini purchase just got put off indefinitely.
As Compared to This? (Score:2)
$270 American vs. $150? Linspire vs. whatever PRC government-approved distro this is?
Big deal (or not, really).
Re:As Compared to This? (Score:2)
The Municator would be ideal for a cheap car PC, or for a GPS mapping box I want to build for my ATV.
At $149 I'm ready to buy one and see how easy it is hack / alter.
Debian MIPS (Score:2)
You should compare it to a mac mini and tell me if anything is not made in China these days.
Red Flag, Microsoft, same thing [slashdot.org]. Good thing you don't need either. Expect to see a lot of activity with Debian MIPS [debian.org].
The sheep of things to come (Score:3, Insightful)
Can you find it anywhere? (Score:5, Interesting)
In summary, it's not a 150 dollar device until you can acquire one somewhere at that price.
very interesting (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/08/01/HNgodso
Assuming, though, that legal and patent issues don't prevent it being sourced in US-bound computers and components...
Is this really so bad? (Score:2, Insightful)
Ambitious (Score:2, Troll)
You know, purely based on context, the meaning of the word "ambitious" starts shifting to a new meaning of "brave but clueless".
Why would I need a computer based on non-Intel chip for? Is there any software for it? The article says we'll do it to say no to WinTel. I need to buy a $150 worthless piece of hardware to say no to WinTel.
Are they targeting kindergardeners or something?
That's like selling cheap Internet that's however not Internet so you can't connec
Re:most computer users (Score:2)
Explain that to the said computer users: no movie sites, no game sites, no interactive sites, no web games.
Why? Because there's no Flash for this CPU architecture and there won't be. You can bet computer users care about that.
Re:most computer users (Score:3, Informative)
First, applications ARE available on "alternate" (from your point of view) platforms. Lots of applications. Photo editing, CAD, Office applications. Instant messaging, email and web browsing applications. Gaming, video conferencing, diagraming and project management applications. Financial, programming, and database applications.
Second, there will be a "flash rendering" component available. Start with "gnash".
Third, QEMU will be able to run Intel binaries, where it is otherwise impossi
Interesting Uses (Score:3, Insightful)
I challenge anyone here to actually go out and purchase the equivalent, new (not refurbished/used,) components and put it together into such a small footprint as this thing, with the ability to power it by lithium-ion battery, for under $150 USD.
The most appealing spec to me is the size. This thing is t-i-n-y. With that in mind, here are a couple uses I have thought of for them:
1. Car PC (media player, engine performance monitor, GPS navigation.) You can roll your own Car PC's these days, but for $150?
2. Home automation controller (have a touchscreen monitor mounted into a recessed area in a wall, with this thing inside a small space, which would also be recessed into the wall, under the monitor.)
YellowSheepRiver (Score:4, Funny)
Thank you. I'll be here all week.
Driver Support (Score:2, Insightful)
What are the market drivers? (Score:2)
I doubt the target market for such cheep computers is families at home - as many people pointed out, it'd take 4-6 months pay for them. It's businesses that will make most use of this hardware, and in bulk orders o
Interesting Name. (Score:2)
Well, I guess it beats "Sheep Yellow River," which can sometimes be found downhill from where large numbers of sheep are grazing.
Re: (Score:2)
deja vu (Score:2)
Re:1 problem (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:1 problem (Score:2)
Using cars as an analogy to computers works well on many levels. In this case, I would compare it to a small four cylinder engine, when designed properly, tweaked, and with the proper supporting components, can outrace a stock V6 from another vehicle. And it will probably use less gas in the process.
It's a rough comparison, but it begins to paint the picture. Raw power means
Re:1 problem (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:1 problem (Score:5, Insightful)
You don't have to. You just have to convince them it's a better bang for the buck. Not everyone drives a Mercedes - and it's not because they think their Kias are better cars.
Re:1 problem (Score:2)
I'd think the most likely reason these won't sell well in the US is marketing and incompatibility. For one, good luck outmarketing Dell and Intel here in the US. For incompatibility, who the heck will be writing compatible drivers for this sort of system for us geeks to add video cards to, connect M
Re:1 problem (Score:2)
I would expect video card drivers to be produced for this platform as video cards get into the same pricing bracket w.r.t. video cards that this machine is w.r.t. PCs generally - I would expect this to be true not just for video cards, but any sort of add on devices that require drivers.
As far as MP3 players go, most of those I've run across (not many, perhaps, but the one
Re:1 problem (Score:2)
Hey, I'm a techie and I'll buy one.
Wanna know why?
Small and obviously perfectly runs linux, I can create my self one hell of a media center with it (or irc console, or office machine, or browsing, mailing), but in the same time require as less space as possible.
I'm very satisfied with buying Opterons for my workstations (and I got 10 of them), but for my media center or low
Re:1 problem (Score:3, Insightful)
I used it for word processing, spreadsheets, charts, databases, basic programming and even games!
Our need for something faster is somewhat artificial. People don't need to have the latest and the greatest unless they want floating transparent rotating windows or to play duke nukem forever.
Our perception of utility and function has been distorted by our voracious consumerism.
By our logic and reasoning, if we were ever visited b
Re:1 problem (Score:2)
It'll be insanely tough to convince customers that a 600mhz, 256mb ram linux machine is equivalent or better than a 2.0ghz, 512mb winbox
Why should they even try? It's a Linux box, that costs $150. In parts of the world where $150 is a considerable amount of money, I would think that would be a pretty strong selling point compared to a $2K dual-core SLI Windows machine.
Re:Branding Issues (Score:3, Informative)
No, it is simply your total lack of education. Google on "Yellow River China" and you'll find it is one of the most important rivers in the world and along with the Tigris/Euphrates and Nile is where one of the earliest civilizations developed, sometime around 4000 B.C.
It is named after the color of the silt in the water, just like the Red River whi
Re:Branding Issues (Score:2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_River [wikipedia.org]
Re:Branding Issues (Score:2)
Re:1 problem (Score:2)
"Realistic" is a fairly arbitrary term that means little in the context of an altruistic project like the $100 laptop initiative. If you want to be realistic, sto
Re:Such a (sucky) deal! (Score:5, Insightful)
Let's say that right now the cheapest PC you could get were $3000 (akin to the Dell $300 box), and a really good one cost $30,000 (think your $3K gaming box). Making a crappy machine for $1500 means that there are a whole bunch of folks would couldn't possibly afford a new computer who now can.
Remember, these things aren't targeted at the US market, and aren't targeted at people who can afford current prices.
Re:Such a (sucky) deal! (Score:2)
We throw away millions of computers every year. China sends us new stuff and the boats go home empty.
Why don't we send them our old computers for $10 each?
Re:Such a (sucky) deal! (Score:2)
Re:Such a (sucky) deal! (Score:2)
Now scale those figures.
The $300 box is equivalent to $30,000 in China for the average worker. And the $3k box is, wait for it, $300,000 to the Average Chinese person.
Now I think we see an accurate picture.
Re:Such a (sucky) deal! (Score:2)
Re:Its a bunch of crap (Score:3, Insightful)
Assuming that this processor is no slower than a 600mhz Pentium III, the machine can easily run a normal set of productivity applications and access the internet. It'll be slow, but not too bad.
As other posters have stated, $150 in rural China is like half a year's pay. Paying more than twice as much for better performance isn't nessisarily the plan. It'd be like if I had gotten a BMW C series instead of my Hyundai Accent - possible, but not nessisarily economically responsible.
I'm sick and tired of this argument (Score:3, Insightful)
I do sidework where we have to worry about these kinds of things. After we find a good deal on parts we ask ours