Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Japan to Discourage Sale of Old Electronics

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wed Feb 22, 2006 06:04 PM
from the good-news-for-hardware-hackers-in-hanoi dept.
devphaeton writes to tell us Engadget is reporting that after April 1st (no this is not an April fools joke) the sale of old electronics in Japan could become much harder. From the article: "It seems that Japan's government revised its "Electrical Appliance and Material Safety Law" back in April 2001, and added a stipulation that items authorized under the country's old law (the "Electrical Appliance and Material Control Law") couldn't be sold anymore, but granted those products a five-year grace period. Well, if you check your convenient wall calendar, you'll see that the five-year period is about to end, which means that as of April 1, pretty much any electronic gear sold before April 1, 2001 can't be legally resold in Japan." The article also mentions that sellers can continue to sell old gear providing they get certification that the items conform to modern safety standards.
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by netwiz (33291) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:08PM (#14780581) Homepage
    Sounds like a great way to accomplish exactly what bunches of content owners (note I didn't say "producers") have been screaming at Congress about. Seriously, what better way to guarantee obsolescence and quick turnover for technology if you have to rebuy everything every five years because the old tech is straight up illegal? Maybe I read this wrong, but it seems like a huge windfall for consumer electronics manufacturers if/when this goes into effect...
    • by netwiz (33291) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:10PM (#14780601) Homepage
      Ah, it would seem that in truth, it's only for electrical safety guidelines, kind of like when the UL requires a recall for faulty/dangerous components...
      • IANASE (I am not a safety engineer)
        No, a recall only happens if a product is found to fail the standards that it was originally tested to.

        This is more like; a '69 Mustang doesn't meet todays safety and emissions standards so you can not sell it.

        Or to stay in electronics; your antique tube radio would not meet UL standards today so you have to junk it.

        No, I did not RTFM so don't know if private sales are exempt or whatever.

        • by suitepotato (863945) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @08:47PM (#14781483)
          Except you damn well can sell a 69 Mustang. And register it. And drive it. In CT you get a nice little plate with a picture of a Ford Model T on it and you get certain exemptions and so forth. Which explains all the old unsafe at any speed horribly polluting cars at the weekend cruise nights owned by the upper middle class people who typically vote Democrat and are in favor of those laws against unsafe and polluting cars. As long as they aren't theirs. They also tend to drive huge honkin SUVs during the week. In that attrocious color known as Hunter Green.

          What can you do?
          • Left wing Right wing, not important.

            That everyone agrees big, fuel guzzling, small car crushing vehicles shouldn't be on the road (let alone truck excemptions for SUV's in the U.S. [under Bush renewed I might add (Thank you Soccer Mom Vote's for Republicans)]).

            No one wants em on the road, no group can be faulted as long as they are ashamed that the act took place and are making actions to rectify the situation.
              • Why should others have to change their behavior to suit you?

                Because it's not about suiting "you", it's about suiting "the planet", and everyone else you share it with (NB: you are not the centre of the universe)
              • If you don't like people driving bigger vehicles than you, get a bigger vehicle yourself.

                Perfect logic, if only the people hating on you were doing so simply because they're jealous of the volumetric size of your vehicle.

                Reminds me of smokers who get defensive about people that find their habit disgusting and take measure to do something about it. As if it's not that the people don't dislike smoke blown in their face. Oh, no. They do it because they enjoy taking away the smoker's liberty or because they w
          • Which explains all the old unsafe at any speed horribly polluting cars at the weekend cruise nights owned by the upper middle class people who typically vote Democrat and are in favor of those laws against unsafe and polluting cars. As long as they aren't theirs. They also tend to drive huge honkin SUVs during the week.

            Only an idiot would say that.

            First of all, if you've been around the country at all, you'd know that the large majority of in-use pre-80s cars are in RED STATES, where money is scarce, fixing

          • "Except you damn well can sell a 69 Mustang. And register it. And drive it."

            Surely you aren't wanting to destroy a piece of living history are you? Lord, give it a break. It isn't like there are tons of these old 'polluter' cars on the roads these days. Certainly, a few of them driving around on the weekends isn't even making a DENT is the pollution of the atmosphere...or a chief cause of 'global warming'.

            Hey, old 110+ year old houses aren't efficient nor insulated properly, and waste energy. Should we

          • Connecticut is an interesting place. They are generally regarded as liberal, yet they have a Republican governor who has the highest approval of any governor, and a war hawk Democratic senator who may not win re-election. I'd say that it's not safe to make blanket assumptions about the political leanings of the state's population.
    • Though it might not have been the original intent it might be a nice means of forced consumerism for an economy struggling against a weak Yen.
      • by tcopeland (32225) * <[tom] [at] [infoether.com]> on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:17PM (#14780670) Homepage
        > for an economy struggling against a weak Yen.

        The Japanese economy is struggling against their own demographics [indexmundi.com]; there are fewer and fewer young people to support more and more older folks. Hard to say how that's going to sort itself out... but seems like a vacuum is opening there that will be filled by someone.
        • agreed. and to add to that - the rampant consumerism needed to drive modern economies is often diametrically opposed to classic child-rearing --- in Japan anyway. Fewer young women are looking to marry and start families.

          isn't it in japan where they're collecting eggs with the ultimate aim of generating state-children?

        • I guess this is the logical argument against pornography people have been looking for. There's no new blood, brains, and muscle to build up the nation if all your men are buying RealDolls and your women want to be pop stars instead of mothers.
    • by MightyMartian (840721) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:11PM (#14780611) Journal
      There must be a serious plague of exploding N64s and MP3 players in Japan.
      • Antique Electronics? (Score:4, Informative)

        by BigBlockMopar (191202) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @07:24PM (#14781080) Homepage

        There must be a serious plague of exploding N64s and MP3 players in Japan.

        Well, in all seriousness though, this is a problem.

        Lots of early consumer electronics devices won't even remotely approach modern safety standards. Consider early radios and TV sets which often used a "hot chassis" (where the steel chassis was directly connected to one side of the power line as part of a system avoiding the use of an expensive power transformer), like those using the traditional "All American Five [wikipedia.org]" tube lineup (50B5 or 50C5, 35W4, 12AV6, 12BE6, 12BA6), or the flip-leaf toasters of the 1920s. These items constitute only a very small risk because they will mostly be in very casual use by informed collectors and restorers, and short of mounting them in fireproof plexiglass boxes with isolation transformers, they will never even approach modern safety standards. (Note that a hot chassis wasn't as big a risk before they became surrounded by modern grounded electrical equipment - in their designed surroundings, you were unlikely to touch a grounded object at the same time as the radio. Also note that *many* post-war Japanese radios used the All-American Five design!)

        Such a rule would effectively eliminate the collectable marketplace and probably result in the loss of many of the early products of companies which later became leaders in their fields. The first Sony transistor radio is historically significant, as is the first JVC VHS VCR, as is...

        Japan is also noted among automotive enthusiasts for similarly draconian rules surrounding old cars - I cannot corroborate this, but I have heard that the *entire* braking system must be replaced in all cars over a certain number of years of age.

        The grisly irony, of course, is that this is from a culture which reveres aged people... but they're apparently happy to destroy the remaining artifacts those people built.

        (By the way, good rule of thumb: *never* leave any piece of electronic equipment made before about 1980 running unattended, inspect them for possible dangers like rotten insulation, and *always* assume that any exposed metal pieces are connected to one side of the power line.)

    • people can't stop infringing on the copyrights and the copyright holders (the correct term) can't stop trying to get the control over the distribution channels. Sounds fair.
    • Maybe I read this wrong, but it seems like a huge windfall for consumer electronics manufacturers if/when this goes into effect...

      It doesn't mean that people will have to buy new stuff, it just says that all new stuff will have to be compliant.

      If the new standards are harder to comply with, perhaps it could mean less profit on new items sold.

      On the other hand, this power could be used to further DRM restrictions on all consumer electronics manufacturers.

      What the FCC is doing to consumers with this whole dig
  • Wow, this summary is actually a lot better than digg's, where it sounded like ANY hardware >5 years old was banned from being sold. With this explanation it actually starts making sense. It's just another overzealous government protecting it's citizen from unrealistic harms. I read speculation earlier that Sony etc. had lobbied for this legislation to ban competition from the second hand market, but it doesn't sound like it any more. Firstly, this is a one-time effect, and secondly five year old stuff
  • I was gonna make an April Fools jab, but then I realized owning a room full of 30 year old tin boxes [engadget.com] is no laughing matter.
  • Tinkerers? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Blazeix (924805) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:09PM (#14780595) Homepage Journal
    I know I learned a lot about electronics from taking apart old electronics. I'm sure there are many people out there that did the same. Will this come to an end in Japan?
    • If the ban is on selling, then in the short term, wouldn't this increase the amount of old electronics people are willing to give you to take apart?
    • Re:Tinkerers? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by petermgreen (876956) <plugwash@pGINSBERG10link.net minus poet> on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:31PM (#14780757) Homepage
      thing is in the last decade or so (possiblly longer i'm unsure when this started) most consumer electronics has become so complex and/or miniturized that you don't stand a chance of figuring out whats going on without a circuit diagram or a lot of electronics knowlage.

      what did you take apart that taught you a lot about electronics?
      • Most of the time the problem is dried out electrolytic caps. Buy or build an ESR meter, spend 30 cents on caps, and have a working product.

        The silicon parts rarely go bad.

      • thing is in the last decade or so (possiblly longer i'm unsure when this started) most consumer electronics has become so complex and/or miniturized that you don't stand a chance of figuring out whats going on without a circuit diagram or a lot of electronics knowlage.

        Things have gotten more complex, in general, but that doesn't mean there isn't still a tremendous ammount to learn, and fix!

        What are the biggest problems with consumer electronics these days? Dead capacitors, loose solder connections, etc.

        Sur

  • by EmbeddedJanitor (597831) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:11PM (#14780615)
    This has been an ongoing thing in Japan. It drives the Japanese imported car idustry in places like New Zealand. Forcing local consumption also helps Japan develop new products in its quest to export. For an interesting read http://www.virtualschool.edu/mon/Economics/Japan/J apanYes [virtualschool.edu]. I don't endorse or condemn what's written here, not that my endorsement or condemnation are worth jack.
  • Only retail (Score:5, Informative)

    by JanneM (7445) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:12PM (#14780628) Homepage
    This is only retail sales, not individuals. And it isn't a ban, it merely requires the retailer to take responsibility that the device is safe according to the new standard. And it involves only the safety of high-voltage (mains-powered) equipment, not electronics.

    Here's a link discussing it: http://www.mutantfrog.com/2006/02/22/2nd-hand-elec tronics-sales-will-not-soon-be-illegal-in-japan/ [mutantfrog.com]
       
  • You really have to wonder how effective their recycling operations are. Japan is going to experience a massive increase in solid waste being disposed of - with a good portion of it requiring special processing to handle the toxic elements - if this law is actually enforced.

    Then again, I think this law is just a ploy by Nintendo lobbyists to force Japanese consumers to purchase their continual stream of repackaged..er..."innovative" GameBoys and uses a Revolution to play all of the old games, instead of a 1,
  • So if people can't resell the stuff, I'm willing to bet alot of it will end up in the garbage. And I'm sure most of what ends up in the garbage won't be disposed of properly.
  • This is ridiculous. Why stop the resale of old electronics? Electronics IMPROVE over time - why stop the resale of old ones?

    As technology is phased out, it is hard to get unless resold - i.e. the Famicom. So you can't buy an old electronic?

    Buying older games for my N64 doesn't provide any competition to my buying of games for my Xbox 360. The N64 is different, and I can get classics for it. I can get better (looking) games for my 360.

    My point? Old electronics don't compete with new ones. To stop resale coul
    • by SydShamino (547793) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:55PM (#14780898)
      As has been pointed out, this only applies to old electronics that connect to MAINS circuits (e.g. wall outlets, which are 100 VAC RMS in Japan IIRC).

      Category II circuit, such as MAINS, as defined by IEC and (in the US) Underwriter's Laboratories, must be designed to tolerate overvoltage conditions such as those caused by transformer shorts or relatively distant lightning strikes. From UL 3121-1, a circuit designed with a working voltage of 100 V DC or AC RMS must tolerate a peak impulse voltage of 1360 V for a few microseconds (from table D.10). This doesn't necessarily mean that the product still has to work after such an impulse; it just means that the product must remain safe to the operator for such an impulse. Fuses can blow, chips can be damaged, but no voltage greater than 60 V DC / 42.4 V AC pk can be exposed to the user.

      I assume that Japan's old standard, before 2001, was weaker than this. Thus, older electronics can't be sold because they could theoretically kill the users.

      This only applies to products that carried MAINS voltages. (Products with wall-warts limit the high voltage to the wall, and are completely unaffected.) Even then, the old products might have been designed above the standard, and therefore could still be sold anyway.

      (Disclaimer: I design high voltage hardware products.)
  • As far as regular consumers go, this regulation is not a big deal in Japan. Many Japanese would prefer buying new hardwares/appliances to buying them used (the same goes to automotives).

    Yes, there is a niche market to resell the used materials, but the market is not as big as it is over here in the U.S. (I'm thinking eBay or craiglist). So from consumers' stand point I don't think this would cause major headaches.

    As far as the recycling of old gadgets go? For *that*, I would like to know what the government
  • Disappointing (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ickoonite (639305) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:14PM (#14780645) Homepage
    This is rather disheartening news. One of the most wonderful things about Japan is its thriving second hand market, and I for one spent an awful lot of money in shops like Sofmap [sofmap.com], mostly on Mac stuff.

    It all seemed to work so well. The Japanese have, to put it mildly, something of a penchant for things shiny and new, so what they toss out would be regarded by Westerners as nearly new. So rather than putting all this nearly new stuff to waste, they sell it to shops like Sofmap, who sell it on to people like me, who are quite happy with a nearly new bargain. Contrast that with, say, Britain, where, the mobile phone market excepted, we make the most of our computers and such - the term the Japanese use is tsukaikomu.

    It's not as though this is going to net the computer companies much more profit - people buy new things anyway, as stated above.

    Shame. I had hoped to net myself a Flower Power iMac next time I was out there...

    iqu :s
  • From the Update, I get the idea that it is only for things that may be unsafe to sell...So, the old model of a TV set that was known to shock people won't be legal to sell, but the old cell phone or 486 is fine?
  • Since nobody in their right mind will bother certifying old equipment for resell, what this law does is push all that old stuff off-shore really fast. Most will go to China is my guess.

    Now, this undercuts a market in Japan for old stuff, and that market may or may not have been important in the first place. But the law *will* create a few more sales for electronics companies. I suppose Ebay and the others are a bit put off since used electronics might be a big part of their sales... but I don't know that fo
  • by Shadow Wrought (586631) * <shadow,wrought&gmail,com> on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:18PM (#14780677) Homepage Journal
    Dumped Japanese consumer electronics. Buy Now!
  • by Dzimas (547818) on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:23PM (#14780710)
    Similar restrictions are going into effect across Europe. Their goal is two-fold: restrict the sale of goods containing certain hazardous substances such as lead-based solder, mercury, and a handful of others (termed the RoHS initiative). If you think about it, this makes sense. We can't pee in our drinking water forever. ;) The second part of the European legislation involves a formal disposal process for *all* electronic devices. It's termed WEE, and requires manufacturers to arrange for the collection and recycling/disposal of all our old crap.

    Like Japan, this may effect the resale of used goods, although there will be a patchwork of mildly inconsistent laws throughout the EU. As I see it, these initiatives will have enormous impact on the used technology market AND on small manufacturers, as another level of paperwork and expense is added to the process. The result could be fewer garage startups like Apple and H-P.

    • Of human lead disposal, the vast majority, over 90%, is car battries. Solder is only a fraction of the remaining fraction. Eliminating lead solder, while keeping lead car battries, is like saving power by turning off a table lamp, while leaving your windows open and AC on.

      But it gets worse. The non-lead solders are predominantly tin. This has two major disadvantages over lead based solders:

      1) Higher melting point. Means more components get fried and more joints don't form properly in creation, leading to mo
      • Of human lead disposal, the vast majority, over 90%, is car battries. Solder is only a fraction of the remaining fraction.

        Car batteries have enough value that you can be sure they will practically ALWAYS be recycled properly.

        Lead solder, however, gets tossed into landfills all the time, in the form of discarded stereos, computers, etc.

        Eliminating lead solder, while keeping lead car battries, is like saving power by turning off a table lamp, while leaving your windows open and AC on.

        Wow, what a terrible anal

    • "We can't pee in our drinking water forever. "

      except that water has already been peed in.
      Seriously, how is taking all the old equipment and througinh it away going to help? I am all for finding cleaner ways to do things, but you can't take back the lead and mercury already in components.
  • I suspect that if electronics are harder to re-sell in Japan, we're going to start seeing some neat cheap used electronics coming over to foreign markets. I wouldn't mind if some of the "made for the Japanese market only" notebooks and appliances became available used in the US.

    --Pat

  • Turns out that sellers of certain kinds of old gear will have to get a government seal certifying that the items adhere to modern saftey standards if they want to sell the stuff after April 1. - I feel there is some money to be made here by some industrious government workers.
  • Vintage Audio (Score:5, Interesting)

    by HowIsMyDriving? (142335) <ben.parkhurstNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Wednesday February 22 2006, @06:44PM (#14780847)
    People in Japan over the last 30 years have been draining Vintage tubed audio equipment and horn loudspeakers from the US like no other country. If you were to go over to Japan with an old Western Electric 300b Based tube amp, you could get thousands of dollars for it. An example of a Mcintosh MC 30 6l6 based amp going price in the US is around 600-1000 dollars per mono bock. If I were to take the amps over there, I could get 5-10k for a set. The same with Altec, JBL, Klipsch, Western electric speakers. This will hurt a huge tubed audio and vintage audio industry in Japan. Most of their high end audio gear is still tubed based, and they often love to use vintage caps, resistors, transformers, for they think they have better sound. This will put lots of people out of business.
    • I work for a small manufacturer of high-end vacuum tube audio equipment in the USA. While we have almost zero sales in Japan, we often get inquiries about vintage equipment and tubes. Last month, a Japanese gentleman stopped by the shop, with an American friend & interpreter. The laundry list was exactly as you describe - Western Electric, Voice of the Theater, Ampex, JBL, Altec, Electro-Voice and so forth.

      As one would expect, he was exceptionally polite and willing to look at anything we cared to sho