Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Keeping a Data Center Cool on the Cheap

Posted by timothy on Sun Jun 26, 2005 11:56 PM
from the yankee-ingenuity dept.
jedimaud writes "You've heard of bubble wrap, and the boy in the bubble -- now, here's a datacenter in a bubble. I work for a government agency that, like most, is trying to cut back some costs, and one of those costs is a REAL datacenter. So, we decided to wrap the whole thing in plastic (including two 1.5 ton ACs). The room hovers about 83 degrees, however, the racks in the bubble (ok, more like a termite tent) stay about 10 degree cooler. Here's some pics to check it out."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Wow... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Computer Mutt (847977) on Sunday June 26 2005, @11:57PM (#12918065)
    Now that's cool.
  • Well, if your site is hosted by that Data Center, it just got a lot hotter in that bubble!
  • by ericdano (113424) on Sunday June 26 2005, @11:59PM (#12918071) Homepage
    Wonder if the bubbles are working now that it's been SLASHDOTTED!!
        • Re:Wonder if... (Score:5, Insightful)

          by shawb (16347) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:24AM (#12918181)
          I think in this case the AC only has to work on pumping the excess heat from the servers out, and not cooling the whole room. Doesn't matter how warm the room gets outside of the bubbles.
          • Sure it matters -- The bubble still needs to insulate and the AC still needs to dissipate, both of which are greatly affected by the heat difference inside and outside the bubble.
  • by dangitman (862676) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:00AM (#12918075)
    Do not place datacenter over head. Keep out of reach of children.
  • by tinrobot (314936) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:00AM (#12918079)
    Because... stuff always needs more duct tape.
  • by Guppy06 (410832) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:01AM (#12918085) Journal
    "(including two 1.5 ton ACs)"

    "Ton" here refers to a "ton of cooling," a measure of power. It was originally intended to mean "the power required to melt one ton of ice in 24 hours." Since that varies based on a bunch of conditions, it was pegged at 12,000 Btu/h.

    When they changed the definition of "calorie" to mean 4.1868 J, converting Celsius to Fahrenheit and grams to pounds gives us a conversion factor of 1 ton of cooling being exactly 3 516.852 842 066 7 W.

    In other words, each a/c unit is about 5.25 kW of cooling each, or 10.5 kW total.

    Oh, and 83 degrees Fahrenheit is about 301 kelvin and a ten-degree Fahrenheit difference is a difference of 6 kelvin.

    (According to my old HVAC prof, there's been little to no progress in "metricizing" the industry in the US. Having used both systems in his course, I'd say I prefer US units, if only because the unit descriptions on things like insulative properties make more sense when the units for thickness and area don't naturally cancel each other out.)

    (And it could be worse. Most home a/c units are labelled on the box as putting out x number of Btu, suggesting they're disposable.)

    (Well, they probably are...)
    • by Solder Fumes (797270) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:05AM (#12918100)
      That was entirely tangential and ultimately useless information that adds no value to this discussion. ...which means that it was perfect for Slashdot! Keep up the good work!
    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2005, @12:31AM (#12918214)
      (including two 1.5 ton ACs)

      Hey, I may be a fat geek, but I'm not THAT fat!
    • by morcheeba (260908) * on Monday June 27 2005, @01:39AM (#12918394) Journal
      "(more like a termite tent)"

      "Most termite species are tropical or subtropical, but a few live in temperate regions." I'd posit that even fewer live in a properly cooled data center. So, on the surface (no pun intended), this doesn't seem to be a good comparison.

      But reading further into the Wikipedia article [wikipedia.org]: "Termites have biting mouthparts and are soft-bodied, of moderate to small size. They live in dark nests and tunnels, except when the winged alates emerge to leave their parent colony." When comparing termites to geeks, they both seem to have biting mouth parts and the geeks are definitely soft-bodied. And of smaller size. And, like the termites, true geeks live in their parent's basement.

      "Termites cannot themselves digest the wood that they consume." Few geeks can live on chewed-up pencils. So again, another similarity.

      Lastly, Termites construct extremely large and elaborate mounds to house their colonies. ... The internal structure of these mounds can be quite complex, with ventilation chimneys for active temperature control" Need I say more?! [google.com]
      • by Guppy06 (410832) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:47AM (#12918265) Journal
        " but last time I checked, a nine degree Fahrenheit difference was a difference of five degrees Celsius,"

        ... which means 10 is 5 5/9, rounding up to 6. Guess I didn't use the word "about" enough times for you.

        But hey, if you really wanna get anal, do it right.

        "assuming that 273 K = 32 degF,"

        32 degrees Fahrenheit is 273.15 kelvin.

        "The temperatures chosen were freezing and boiling of water at 1 atm pressure, in case anyone didn't know."

        At 101 325 Pa, water boils at 373.124 kelvin. Celsius /= centigrade. The freezing point is also flakey, but not within three decimal places at least. This is why all modern temperature scales are pegged to the triple point (273.16 K)instead of trying to correlate two data points that move around with respect to each other.

        "The correct Fahrenheit boiling point of water (at 1 atm) is 212 degF.)"

        Try 211.953 degrees Fahrenheit.

        Oh, and the first letter of SI units (like kelvin) is never capitalized.

        • Wrong, units are not mere tools, they're communication tools, and the most important is not to be familiar with the communication tools it's that everyone is able to use&understand them. The efficiency of a communication tool comes from the quality and reliability of the communication it provides.

          metric is the standardised universal way to communicate, hence the tool to use.

          Just as english is currently the standardized and *mostly* universal communication language and should therefore be used whenev
  • Real Data Center (Score:5, Informative)

    by aaarrrgggh (9205) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:03AM (#12918091)
    First off, a "real" data center needs a little more than 1.5 Tons of cooling; that will barely cool a single rack in a real data center.

    Insulation is always a nice idea, be the fact of the matter is that to reject the heat from the space you need to provide a means of heat trasnfer. Generally, that requires a temperature differential between your heat source and the outside. If it is cooler outside than in the space, not much is required. If it is warmer, you will have to take advantage of thermodynamics and use a compressorized cycle. This can be more or less efficient, depending on the difference in inside and outside temperatures.

    (A typical data center operates with a 95-110F outside design temperature, and attempts to deliver 48F chilled water to the CRAC units (Computer Room Air Conditioning). This forces about 50% of the energy consumed by the computers to be used (again) to cool the equipment.)

    Call an engineer when everything melts down...
    • Re:Real Data Center (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Craigj0 (10745) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:13AM (#12918127)
      First off, a "real" data center needs a little more than 1.5 Tons of cooling
      I'm pretty sure 3 (2x1.5) is considered a little more than 1.5 but perhaps I'm not using "real" math.
  • I doubt anyone had a chance to cache these pics.
  • by loony (37622) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:04AM (#12918097)
    At least now I know where my tax money went! Termite tents! That's at least more believable than that $15,000 toilet seat and $20,000 hammer :-)

    Peter.
  • by novalogic (697144) <aramovaNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Monday June 27 2005, @12:05AM (#12918101)
    If that A/C unit freezes up/dies/etc, getting wraped in that bubble will cause those machines to overheat rather quickly...

    Might be a good idea to hookup a tempature controlled moter to pull the plastic down if the A/C dies, if you know how, and have a good junk pile, you can do that cheap enough....
  • by team99parody (880782) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:05AM (#12918102) Homepage
    Clean dry cold air. Self sufficient oil. Great physical security
    • by Solder Fumes (797270) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:08AM (#12918107)
      Heck, why not? Run some massive fiber along the big pipeline. Only disadvantage is that you're out on the edge of the Internet, you're not safely embedded in the middle with nice redundant capabilities.
    • I don't know about now, but Alaska didn't used to have a very reliable power grid.

      Any benefits might be offset by having to have huge UPS and generator systems.
          • by Anonymous Coward
            Excuse me, do you run a datacenter for a living?

            When you are running a mission critical datacenter (this is usually all of them, if we are talking about real datacenters here, not the closet of your 5000 square foot PC repair shop where you keep your web server), you have supplies to get you through any length of power outages. This usually includes supplies of diesel fuel and a contract with a fuel supplier to bring more diesel on site for the duration of the outage.

            Do you have any clue how major datacen
    • Build it in a basement with a good vapor barrier. To make it more efficient to cool, use a cooling system that makes use of a ground loop of coolant. They're extremely efficient and not too expensive.

      Without the a/c on, my basement hovers around 68 degrees throughout the year. It's much easier to control the temperature than elsewhere in the house. With a way to actively dissipate heat (the ground loop), it'd be the ideal datacenter location without having to man a post in Alaska. :)
    • by atarione (601740) on Monday June 27 2005, @01:25AM (#12918372)
      the real problem with a data center in alaska is that the fucking polar bears will keep drinking all the cherry coke.
  • If someone has a cache, I'll host.

    email me the goods.

    thumper **AT** alderflats.com
  • I'll tell you Jeb, if that's how the Nebraska State Patrol runs a datacenter, makes me wonder about their crime lab...
  • Mirror (Score:5, Informative)

    by ProtoStar (575347) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:10AM (#12918116)
  • I hate to burst your bubble, but you just got slashdotted.
  • It's misleading (Score:5, Insightful)

    by SamMichaels (213605) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:15AM (#12918136)
    1.5 ton sounds expensive, big and awe-inspiring. It's not. Most people have cheap 1 ton a/c units in their living room walls (12,000 btu). My 12,000 (1 ton) unit is barely able to cool 3 computers. Good luck with a datacenter.
    • Re:It's misleading (Score:4, Interesting)

      by TheFlyingGoat (161967) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:28AM (#12918197) Homepage Journal
      Your 3 computers must be built with awful components. At my former employer we were keeping the entire server room cool with a $200 window air conditioner. The server room had 2 HP servers, a handful of 1U IBM x336 servers, 3 workstations, 2 racks of networking equipment, and a variety of other smaller devices. The window unit ran about once an hour for 5 minutes in 85 degree weather and kept the room sufficiently cool.

      The key is to move your UPS out of the temperature controlled area, since that's the biggest source of heat in most server rooms. Then we were gradually replacing the multitude of old HP servers with the IBM servers. Each IBM could to the work of 4 HP's easily, and ran much cooler than a single HP.

      Your 3 computers must be running 1000+ watt power supplies, multiple 6800 vid cards, and a ton of hard drives if your home a/c is having trouble cooling that room.
    • Re:It's misleading (Score:5, Informative)

      by drmerope (771119) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:49AM (#12918272)
      No offense, but maybe you missed the point?

      The article was entitled "Keeping a Data Center Cool _on the Cheap_" (emphasis added)

      The suggestion being that they were able to significantly cut back on the size and power consumption of the cooling plant by using plastic wrap.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2005, @12:16AM (#12918140)
    keeping a datacenter cool? Thats nothing..

    try moving to india to try and get your job back from dell only to get dysintry and heat stroke, lose your wallet and end up working in low grade indian miget porno to get enough money to buy a can of coke, only to get typhode.

    Bubbles...pfff...

    Ps. I'm writing this from Iran, send help.
  • Better yet (Score:4, Funny)

    by Mr_Icon (124425) on Monday June 27 2005, @12:31AM (#12918211) Homepage
    You want cool and cheap? Move your datacenter to the North of Siberia.
  • by pla (258480) on Monday June 27 2005, @01:07AM (#12918335) Journal
    Having recently faced a similar problem (though on a much smaller scale), we came up with almost the same solution.

    As one suggestion, though, cardboard (in 4x8ft sheets) proved a lot easier to work with than plastic sheets. For starters, the plastic requires attachment at the ceiling, and will eventually come loose under its own weight; cardboard, with a single fold in the sheet, will stand upright and support its own weight for years, assuming not too high of a humidity level. For another, cardboard won't flap around and potentially block air intakes nearly so easily as plastic will.

    Believe it or not, though, what we found the most effective way to make use of barely adequate AC - Don't treat the room as a closed system. You've basically used the plastic sheets to build giant chimneys - Now take advantage of that fact, and along with a high volume fan above each rack, just exhaust the air at the top outside rather than recycle it back into the room... Think of it this way... You spec your cooling to work to perhaps 110F ambient, right? At the top of a full rack, with 50-60F going in the bottom, you probably have 120-130F going out the top. Does it take more work to cool 130F, or 110F, back to 50F? Not to mention, your normal ambient shouldn't come anywhere near 110F...
      • heh, the plastic folks maybe weren't acquainted with Mr. OSHA and Mr. Confined Space and Mr. Oxygen Deficency Hazard, so adding Mr. Fire Marshall to the list of ignored people isn't a big step.
  • by KlaymenDK (713149) on Monday June 27 2005, @02:43AM (#12918531) Journal
    ...it's about load testing his data center!

    "Here's some pics to check it out." ?? Dead giveaway!
  • by allanj (151784) on Monday June 27 2005, @04:36AM (#12918797)
    "two 1.5 ton AC"

    I know that lots of geeks tend to gain weight, but those are big Anonymous Cowards!
  • by deacon (40533) on Monday June 27 2005, @08:40AM (#12919759) Journal
    Hey Kids!

    Ever wonder why computers are made of metal? Why the plastic pieces are made of plastics that meet flammability performance standards?

    Tiny Tim raises his hand

    Yes, Tiny Tim?

    Please, Mr Deacon Sir, so that if some source of ignition is present, the computer does not turn into a fireball spewing deadly poisionous smoke, Sir!

    Very Good, Tiny Tim. And what happens if someone hangs up huge sheets of generic, flammable plastic in an area with lots of potential ignition sources?

    Please, Mr Deacon Sir, sooner or later it catches fire, and people die. If these boneheads are lucky, Sir, someone from the Building Facilities or the Building Inspector will see this website and make them take it down, Sir.

    Very good, Tiny Tim. The rest of the class is to read up on Flammability [geplastics.com].