Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Data Storage

NIST Releases Study Of CD/DVD Longevity 325

dirkin writes "The National Institute of Standards and Technology has released a preliminary study of the potential lifespan of CD-Rs and DVD-Rs. The PDF study is here. A good starting point for deciding what type of media to purchase to keep those backups and photos kicking around longer. (You DID buy the silver/gold alloy phthalocyanine CDs, didn't you?)"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NIST Releases Study Of CD/DVD Longevity

Comments Filter:
  • mobile fidelity... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jpellino ( 202698 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @09:51PM (#11579328)
    used to include a study of glove compartment temperature cycles for their high end discs...
    • by sh00z ( 206503 ) <sh00z.yahoo@com> on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:55PM (#11579730) Journal
      used to include a study of glove compartment temperature cycles for their high end discs...
      Sounds like my personal study. The second CD I ever burned was at the fastest speed of my writer; I wrote on the label with a Sharpie; I store it in my glove compartment (in Texas). I listen to it once per quarter, and when it fails, I'll start replacing everything else (praying that temperature- and humidity-controlled environments are better for the media's health).
      • by rokzy ( 687636 )
        isn't that a little bit dangerous as music CD players don't care about errors nearly as much as data CDs? hence one type of copy protection being to intentionally fuck the CD up so a computer can't read it but many CD players will.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Holographic storage is almost here. Just more wasted tax dollars on a technology that will be obsolete by the time the media wears out (unless you own ancient cds).
    • Holographic storage has been "almost here" for decades.
      • by Anonymous Coward
        That's what makes it such a great archival medium. Centuries from now, holographic storage will still be "almost here", so you never have to worry about it becoming obsolete.
    • by theid0 ( 813603 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:22PM (#11579529)
      It doesn't matter whether holographic storage is here now, or ever. I have a large collection of CDs on spindles that will surely go bad within the next 3-5 years, but I'm not going to sweat it. If you figure that at least 50 CDs fit onto a single high-capacity DVD (e.g. blu-ray), there's no way I'm going to worry about it.

      However, the same doesn't apply for everyone. Many information-intensive companies are constantly struggling to keep up with the latest technology, spending big $$ on data retrieval. Thousands of tape backups aren't quite as easy to read and consolidate as a bunch of personal CDs. I guess the story here is that most people think CDs are a permanent storage medium.
  • by Kymermosst ( 33885 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @09:52PM (#11579335) Journal
    You DID buy the silver/gold alloy phthalocyanine CDs, didn't you?

    No, I've not ever ran across them, and it's not like they print the reflective layer and dye compositions on the side of the package. Mine are always green-ish.

    (fp?)
    • heres a document that may help: http://www.memorex.com/downloads/whitepapers/Refer ence%20Guide%20for%20Optical%20Media%209-9.pdf [memorex.com]

      page 24+ has some info on the different dyes and reflective layers.
    • by ColaMan ( 37550 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @11:27PM (#11579875) Journal
      Believe me, if they've got it , they'll print it on the box for you - it's not like you can get many other differentiating features in CD's.

      Kodak Gold Ulitma CD's were a silver / gold alloy. I've still got a few from my first burner... they're 5 years old now and still (apparently) ok.

      Here's a FAQ [kodak.com] about data life of kodak CD's. Accelerated aging at 80 degrees C and 80% RH seems a bit tough :-)

    • this web page explains the different CD types, lists who makes them, etc

      http://www.cdmediaworld.com/hardware/cdrom/cd_dye . shtml

      see also the WSJ article, in PDF form

      http://www.mitsuicdr.com/technology/WSJ.com%20-%20 Portals.pdf

      Note (in the "well, duh" dept): if you google [google.com] or froogle [google.com] for phthalocyanine cd, you can find plenty of sources, since these are advertising points.... [Now including convenient links]

  • HD (Score:5, Funny)

    by bogaboga ( 793279 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @09:53PM (#11579342)
    Mine will be kept on a real Hard Disk. What I have now is a 120GB, 7,200 rpm Maxtor HD, which has never disappointed me at all.
    • Re:HD (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Rosonowski ( 250492 ) <rosonowski&gmail,com> on Friday February 04, 2005 @09:55PM (#11579355)
      So instead of worrying sbout the CD falling apart, you have to worry about mechanical failure. Unfortunately, that can happen from just sitting around, especially in something so fragile as a hard disk drive.
      • I declare radiation-hardened compactflash teh new wave of archiving!
      • Re:HD (Score:3, Funny)

        by bogaboga ( 793279 )
        I think what you are saying is not correct! My manufacturer NEVER mentioned lying around as one of the items I should avoid.

        Ohh! Better check on it now.

        • Re:HD (Score:2, Funny)

          by Anonymous Coward
          Your manufacturer went bankrupt, and all his source code and engineering documents are now in the public domain. One recent service bulletin [bhj.org] does say that lying around is something that should be avoided.
        • It doesn't really matter in the meaningful lifespan of a hard drive, ( I mean, who really uses 2GB drives for much of anything anymore ? ) but the drives can and will fail. I have a bunch of new fridge magnets precisely because of this. For whatever reason, the drives refused to work. (across multiple IDE / ATA chipsets and power supplies )
          • The first HD I bought was a 1.6GB WD Caviar. Still in service, almost 8 years after purchase ;-) Then I bought two disks, one from IBM (30GB DeskStar from the (in)famous series) and another from Seagate (60GB Barracuda IV), and they both failed after 2-3 years. Depressing, isn't it?
      • Re:HD (Score:5, Insightful)

        by pair-a-noyd ( 594371 ) on Saturday February 05, 2005 @01:26AM (#11580481)
        Umm, 'scuse me a sec..

        I have a 133 megabyte full height 5.25 Maxtor that is 20 years old, and a 44 megabyte miniscribe that is 22 years old. I saved them back from the days when they were GOLD to me.
        Like a moron, I traded a 100mhz dual trace Tektronix scope for the 133 meg drive. Now it sits on the floor in the closet. But guess what?
        The drive STILL boots and runs. Yep, it's loaded with IBM DOS 3.1 and I can still play some of my old Sierra games on it.

        It's worth squat. But after 20 years of banging around on the floor as I moved several times, it still boots and runs.

        I can't say that for CDR's I burned two years ago. Most of them over 2 years old are riddled with holes, like moths eating wool..

        I DO NOT trust CD or DVD media for long term storage. Piss poor media if you ask me. I wish they had never invented the damn things, I put lots of important data on them over the years just to go back later and find it ruined and gone forever.

        CD and DVD is a BAD technology. It's time to abandon it and reinvent the wheel..

        • Re:HD (Score:3, Informative)

          by justins ( 80659 )
          CD and DVD is a BAD technology. It's time to abandon it and reinvent the wheel..

          You must have missed the point of the article. They aren't all created equal. Some discs will last a lot longer than others.

          You can't create a technology that's immune from crappy generic products at the bottom of the price range, particularly a media technology. Buy better stuff.
    • What you meant to say is that if you care about your data you will keep it on hard disks with an additional removable media solution kept at a different site and not immediatly vulnerable to any data errors that effect the main data site.
      • Re:HD (Score:3, Interesting)

        by TheLink ( 130905 )
        Uh, my removable media are _harddisks_. I've got my HDDs in caddies/trays (with fans) so I can slide them out easily.

        Doing the figures, HDDs aren't really that expensive compared to other media especially when you factor in the performance, reliability, stability and convenience. Buy one or two 200GB HDDs, backup everything (two or more copies just to be sure :) ), then store/archive the HDDs.

        The stability of data on magnetic disks is pretty good. The only problem usually is the electronics failing or the
        • Re:HD (Score:4, Insightful)

          by afidel ( 530433 ) on Saturday February 05, 2005 @12:23AM (#11580212)
          I personally believe tapes and tape drives are a big con-job nowadays.

          They may not be great for home backups (they never really were) but tape is definitly NOT a con-job. LTO-3 is 800GB per ~$150 tape, disk can't touch that, and they backup at up to 160MB/s, again a single drive can't touch that. The only reasonable solutions to backing up LOTS of data are tape or farms and farms of drives which are offsite with a VERY high speed network connection and which are write protected while not being backed up to. The latter can be done but it generally makes tape look cheap. Again for home use there probably isn't a lot of use for tape (I backup my machine by HDD as well), but for my clients I can't imagine using anything other than tape as an offsite/archival solution.
    • Re:HD (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Maxwell ( 13985 )
      There are two kids of Maxtor users - those that have lost data, and those that are about to...

      JON
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 04, 2005 @09:53PM (#11579345)
    Discerning pr0n collectors choose silver/gold alloy phthalocyanine CDs.
  • by Nova Express ( 100383 ) <lawrenceperson.gmail@com> on Friday February 04, 2005 @09:55PM (#11579356) Homepage Journal
    I carve all my important data on stone tablets. If it was good enough for Yaweh, they by Him, its good enough for me! I look forward to over 2000 years of stable storage without data loss! Unless, of course, I need to smite some wayward Israelites with them or something...

    • Data loss (Score:3, Funny)

      by Faust7 ( 314817 )
      I look forward to over 2000 years of stable storage without data loss!

      Yeah, right. Didn't you see Raiders of the Lost Ark? The Ark was full of dust.

      At least you'll be able to melt some Nazis though.
    • Yeah, I was cool with stone tablets too till I heard about that whole Ten Commandments/DRM fiasco. Something about copyrights, devestating floods and 'pillars of salt' kinda irked me.
      • Actually, the Ten Commandments did a lot to fix that kind of abuse. Before they were handed down, nobody could figure out exactly why The Lord was Smiting them. Lot was really pissed when he wife was turned into a pillar of salt for undocumented sins.
        • Lot was really pissed when he wife was turned into a pillar of salt for undocumented sins.

          They were documented in the EULA, tablet 251, paragraph 2, subparagraphs 2-7. Also see Appendix of Glyphs.
    • by fm6 ( 162816 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:25PM (#11579553) Homepage Journal
      I met a traveller from an antique land

      Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
      Stand in the desert. . . Near them, on the sand,
      Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
      And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
      Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
      Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
      The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.
      And on the pedestal these words appear:
      "My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
      Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
      Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
      Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
      The lone and level sands stretch far away.
      -- Percy Bysshe Shelley, Ozymandias, 1818

    • I carve all my important data on stone tablets. If it was good enough for Yaweh, they by Him, its good enough for me!

      Unfortunately, stone can be very brittle and stone tablets shatter easily. You do know there were originally 15 Commandments, don't you?
    • by Macrobat ( 318224 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @11:31PM (#11579902)
      Only problem is, the message gets corrupted really, really fast. Witness the Religious Right in America. Or medieval Europe. Or the tail end of the Roman Empire.
  • by mg2 ( 823681 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @09:56PM (#11579358)
    I still think that corn CDs [slashdot.org] are the best idea... you'll just need to reburn every once in a while.

    It only becomes a problem if you're a big nacho fan...
  • CDRs and DVDRs? I used to back things up on Kodak Gold CDs but I can't find them anymore :/
  • Yes, I did buy gold CDs. Until they stopped being sold around here...
  • I'm backing up onto my CDR now so I don't lose it. I advise the same to everyone else.
  • i always knew... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Bill the Bilby ( 787404 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:00PM (#11579390)
    that buying cheap crappy CD-Rs meant that your data died faster, but I had no idea how the degredation worked. What about the "armored" DVD-Rs from places like Datawrite [datawrite.co.uk]? They're supposedly almost impossible to destroy. How well do they stand up?
  • by PornMaster ( 749461 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:03PM (#11579406) Homepage
    With the study subjecting discs to extremes to cause them to fail, they've shown relative tolerance to certain conditions, but we still don't have "burn to these CDs and keep temp between 60 and 80, RH between 10% and 50%, and light to a minimum and they're good for 10 years" kind of numbers...
    • I design a certain type of reliability test equipment for a living. The tests performed by NIST are not standard length, they took much longer than industry standards for determining reliability.

      The shortest test was 450 hours, most reliability testing takes around one week, NIST took at least twice as long for their tests, and up to two months for some tests.

      Occasionally researchers will run longer tests (one ran a two year test on our equipment), but companies need information quickly.

      Bottom line: the

    • From the article:

      It should be noted that results presented in this paper represent continuous exposure to direct light and extreme temperature/humidity levels. The error rates are not representative of discs stored in typical, normal or ideal storage conditions.

      Do not be mislead by the numbers presented--they have little relevance to how CD-Rs are typically stored.

  • Standards (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Detritus ( 11846 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:06PM (#11579436) Homepage
    What we need are national or international standards for durability and longevity. Then a manufacturer could have their product tested, and if it passed, put a "Meets ISO Standard XYZ" on the packaging.

    I have some Kodak Gold CD-Rs stashed away for archival masters. I have no idea how long the DVD+Rs and DVD+RWs will last.

    • Re:Standards (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Handpaper ( 566373 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @11:01PM (#11579755)
      I have no idea how long the DVD+Rs and DVD+RWs will last.

      DVD media should do better than CD, if only because the data layer is completely encapsulated, as opposed to covered in thin lacquer like CDRs. This assumes, of course, that the edges are similarly well sealed. Looking at my (DataWrite 8x plain white printable) DVD+Rs, that seems to be the case - the data layer stops about 1mm short of the edge of the disc.

  • by Aardpig ( 622459 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:09PM (#11579453)

    ...papyrus. That, or clay tablets. Nothing else comes close. And I'm not joking.

  • Damn... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anita Coney ( 648748 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:11PM (#11579464) Homepage
    All those Netflix movies I've burned will essentially be worthless!

  • As Usual... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ThisIsFred ( 705426 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:16PM (#11579500) Journal
    ...I guess I'm the oddball here. I've never thought of any of these media as permanent storage. In fact, I learned quickly very early on that all are susceptible to wear, damage or degradation. CDR/W and related tech are more a bandwidth-saving item or convenience item than anything else to me. The things that I need to save, I move to newer formats, usually multiple copies if it's important stuff.

    I've yet to lose data to media degradation, however I once lost some important accounting data to a hard drive crash, followed by two ZIP disk backups that were killed by "click-death". One in a billion shot, I guess. Well, I didn't exactly lose the data, I had hard copies on paper, apparently the only semi-permanent storage media that's trustworthy.
    • Re:As Usual... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by DaveJay ( 133437 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:35PM (#11579624)
      The trouble with this approach is the same as the trouble with preserving old videotape material, something I used to be involved in.

      I worked for a museum that preserved such materials, and always wanted to establish a program not just to copy older videotape to newer analog formats (which already existed) but to copy and RE-copy those digital tapes on a two-year cyclical program; the digital data wouldn't degrade during the transfer, and by essentially replacing the media containing the data on a regular basis, we'd have a good chance of saving the material long-term.

      I never got approval for a simple reason: tape stock is expensive, staff is expensive, and coordination of such an effort requires diligence. Similarly, you could use CD-R/DVD-R to back up your material and re-burn the discs on an ongoing rotation, but most people don't have that kind of discipline even if they have the money.

      For me personally, I've found the best approach is to maintain the data on a redundant RAID array, with occasional backup to DVD-R. This way, the data itself will outlive the death of individual local drives, while the DVD-R only needs to serve as a short-term disaster-recovery solution.

      Of course, once my critical dataset gets large enough to require more than a few DVD-Rs, I'll probably get lazy...aren't we about due for a new format by now? ;)
    • Re:As Usual... (Score:3, Interesting)

      by slide-rule ( 153968 )
      Talk about bad luck on archivals and that one-in-a-billion catastrophic failure... the aerospace company I'm an engineer at lost a good deal of test data for a few aircraft engine performance tests in that (1) a disc in a RAID server failed... I think it must've been RAID-5 or whatever lets one disc crap out... (2) while replacing that disc, multiple other discs failed. The remainder of the RAID array now being worthless, (3) the IT/data company went to pull tape backups, and for much of that data (I think
    • Re:As Usual... (Score:3, Interesting)

      by afidel ( 530433 )
      Don't lump RW in with CDR!

      CD-RW uses a phase change crystaline latice to store data, not a volatile organic dye. This means that the chemical breakdown seen in CD-R's is not going to be present in a CD-RW. For this reason I think that CD-RW is a vastly superior archival solution, of course it doesn't work in areas where WORM is mandated (such as securities firms) but for something like home backups it should seriously be considered. Unfortunatly even with the recent flurry of attention to CD-R archival qua
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:19PM (#11579513)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Useless (Score:5, Informative)

    by SuperBanana ( 662181 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:22PM (#11579533)
    This report is mostly useless. Why?

    As others have noted, the technologies used in the media are never printed on the packaging. Furthe, like many commodity items, the wrapper has nothing to do with who actually made the media. One spindle of Brand Y disks can be made by Manufacturer A, and the spindle twice its size, with the same labelling, also from Brand Y- will be made by Manufacturer Z. It is extremely difficult to be an educated consumer under these conditions.

    It happens in lots of other places- gasolene is not "made" by Mobil; Mobil, Hess, Shell, Sunoco etc contract to area distributors. The distributors buy from whoever is the cheapest or distributes to their area; they slosh-mix any company-specific additives, if any, on the way to the station. Milk? Guess what- federal law requires that the bottling plant's registration number be printed on every bottle of milk. Next time you're in the store, notice how the brand name and generic store brand milk have the same prefix on that stamped number? Notice the brand name milk is pretty expensive compared to the store brand stuff? Dirty little secret of the milk industry, in plain view.

    When I need CD-R/DVD-R media, I don't want to have to spend an hour sitting on some webforum reading posts to find out what the most reliable media looks like this week and where to buy it. I want to walk into a store, see "gold type cyno-whatever", see it's $2 more for a spindle of 20 than the other stuff, and walk out.

    Though I'm sure there is collusion among manufacturers at the moment, it's only a matter of time before one manufacturer realizes they can market their product based on media type/chemistry thanks to this report educating buyers (the major PC mags will probably pick this up in an issue or two).

    What bugs me is how bad my DVD-R disks SMELL. I have to hold the spindle at arm's length when I open the cakebox, and leave the room until the disk is done, because it reeks. I want to know what the hell makes it smell so bad...or, then again, maybe I don't...

    • Re:Useless (Score:5, Informative)

      by the eric conspiracy ( 20178 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:27PM (#11579570)
      You generally won't see gold/silver stabilized dye CDRs in stores. They are more expensive, so stores don't carry them. Look online for Mitsui or MAM-A. They certainly identify the dye system in their literature because it is well known to be vastly superior to the others.

    • Re:Useless (Score:3, Insightful)

      by fm6 ( 162816 )
      This report is mostly useless ... the technologies used in the media are never printed on the packaging.
      But publicizing the problem is a good way to get full disclosure on the packaging. If this report attracts enough attention, you can expect to see advertisements for "archival quality" optical disks. Hardly useless.
    • I'm not one to follow up my own posts, but I found something very interesting reading the PDF more closely.

      DVD-R media is probably the hottest market right now (even NIST/LoC admit CD media is nearly useless in terms of storage capacity), and note that NIST used the least number of samples, couldn't get any information on composition other than "it's Cyanine based" (gee, thanks), and DID NOT name this mysterious "D2" sample that was so much better than the others?

      Sounds like NIST doesn't want to burn an

      • Re:followup (Score:3, Interesting)

        DID NOT name this mysterious "D2" sample that was so much better than the others?

        While it was not named, I think I can guess. Mitsui/MAM-A. They are stating now that their DVD-Rs are silver/phenothiazine based, which is the same chmistry that kicks serious butt with CD-Rs.

        What will be interesting is to see if this chemistry holds up with Blu-Ray. The shorter wavelength may or may not be compatable with the dye.

    • What bugs me is how bad my DVD-R disks SMELL.

      Now not only can you get high off the markers to label the discs, but you can get high off the discs themselves.
    • Re:Useless (Score:5, Informative)

      by polyomninym ( 648843 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @11:48PM (#11580013)
      Hey,
      I'm a duplication specialist in Redmond, WA. I handle and analyze nearly all existing products in the world.
      Why DVD's smell so freakin' bad, is beacause they are two half-discs 'glued' together. I dupe these by the thousands; some brands, like Taiyo Yuden, will smell better than Mitsui Maotsu(Mam-A).

      For the best products on the planet:
      www.dsgi.com
      Get educated about it, and you will appreciate your results.

      later

  • Taiyo Yuden (Score:5, Informative)

    by hkmp5sd5 ( 98671 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:26PM (#11579566)
    Older discussion: Say Goodbye To Your CD-Rs In Two Years? [slashdot.org]

    afterdawn had a discussion on CD-R brands [afterdawn.com] a while back. In short, go with Taiyo Yuden. And to identify Taiyo Yuden [cdfreaks.com]?
  • Readers (Score:4, Insightful)

    by k3v1n ( 262210 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:31PM (#11579592) Homepage
    The biggest issue IMO isn't the media, but the readers. So what if your CD-RW is still readable in 20 years if you can't even find a CD-ROM around to read them with?

    I still have tons of 5" floppy disks around, and I'm sure the data on them is usable, but getting it off is another story.
    • Re:Readers (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 04, 2005 @11:07PM (#11579792)
      "I still have tons of 5" floppy disks"

      That could be a problem, since the only drives around are for 5.25" disks.

      -Anonymous Phil
  • Forget it! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by lawpoop ( 604919 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:33PM (#11579603) Homepage Journal
    I'm no longer keeping things on CD or DVD for storage. I keep everything live on a RAID. I plan on building a new raid every 2-3 years as disk prices fall, and just keep the data live.

    In fact, if I had enough space, I would back up my commerically manufactured CDs and DVDs, given the horror stories I've heard about their crappy longevity. The MP/RIAA wants you to re-purchase all the content they've sold you every 5-6 years. Screw 'em.

    • This works fine until the day your power supply dies and takes the drives with it. It's unlikely to happen; but that does not mean impossible... I know. I've seen it.
    • Others have mentioned power supplies taking out your data - but really the most likely cause of data loss is user error. Other good ways for your data to die in a RAID are controller problems and OS bugs trashing your file system.

  • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by newr00tic ( 471568 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @10:56PM (#11579737) Journal
    (NOT a joke post)

    Is it true with many things that reflect light, that the less light it throws back, the more it ABSORBS?

    --meaning here probably, that absorbation is what degrades the medium.

    I mean, I've had both "dull" and "blinding" discs, (some light-green one's that basically didn't shine at all once "shone on",) and the EXTREMELY reflective one's, that would practically blind you, to some extent.. --I mean, when angled towards a tungsten bulb, or flashlight, whatever..

    -Get the drift? --Maybe this is of some importance, don't ask me.. I always go for 'the shiny' one's; as I've suspected them to be "better"..
    • by ColaMan ( 37550 )
      The reflective layer on CD's is what makes it all work. If you get a cheap CD and look at it's pale green layer... then get a hold of a Kodak ultima CD, you'll certainly spot the difference in reflectivity.

      I *presume* that as the media ages, the margin of error slowly shrinks to the point where your media is now unreadable. As all you're reading is either :
      - the reflected light from the reflective layer
      or
      - the absence of reflected light due to the dye

      Discs with lower reflectivity will end up useless f
    • by whitis ( 310873 )

      While using a flashlight on a disk may be worth doing, the results may not mean what you think they will. First, light from the flashlight is either reflected, absorbed, or transmitted. If you shine light through the disk, you can see pinholes that could be a sign of poor manufacturing or subsequent damage. It is not the absolute reflectivity of the disk that matters it is the contrast.

      Imagine disk A reflects 90% of light for a one and 80% of the light for a zero. Disk B reflects 70% of the li

  • Except for approximately 2% of business-critical or irreplacable data (pictures maybe), most of the stuff you have you don't need. You think you might need it, and you want to know that you have it, but you'll never need it. I know that everything, except my (backed up) downloaded music collection, and some other things, either I won't need or can replace free and easy. In 2 years, I guarantee the majority of what is on your computer now will be useless to you (other than stuff that can be easily replace
  • by swschrad ( 312009 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @11:49PM (#11580020) Homepage Journal
    and ordering numbers, folks. not many websites of manufacturers tell you what they're using.

    the only one I can find right now in three websites (verbatim, imation, tdk) is that tdk uses metal-stabilized cyanine dye in their CD-Rs. that would make them a "c5" sample, which is fairly resistant to stray UV, but temperature/humidity sensitive. to me, TDKs sound just a little bright, but it's not bright enough to be a car-only disk.

    verbatim used to boast of using blue azochrome dye, which In The Beginning was prized by burners who wanted accurate audio. verbatim blue is still out there in the "digital vinyl" series at least. that would be an "S1" or "S3", who knows which, which has some issues with both temp/humidity as well as strong UV. Sounded good and neutral.

    what I haven't seen is the richer, "tube" toned deep green of Sony and 3M 2x/4x disks of the late 90s. never knew what it was chemically, either. I'd order a case of them if I could find 'em. no "scatter-shatter" sound on those disks.

    the only thing I've had issues with are budget CD-Rs with a barely-visible green coating to this point. they go away in a dark, double-shielded player in a console in the car, and have shelf life issues in the house as well. After two years, they wouldn't even pass the pre-record test of the burner. Never again.

    but I can't buy for known permanance, despite NIST, because they don't call out whose disks they tested. Hope somebody consumer-oriented gets an idea from this, and beats 'em up with brand names attached. there's going to be somebody out there who has used junk disks forever and never lost a one sitting open under the cat hair on the window ledge, so anecdotal evidence is, uhhh, not reliable. even mine.
    • Useful info on a few of the manufacturers, thx. But seriously, are you really attempting to describe the performance of a digital storage medium with terms used to describe the way the stored data sounds? "bright", "good and neutral", "richer, 'tube' toned"?

      The terms you use correlate to accuracy of reproduction of various frequency of audio. Audio stored on a CD (I"m not talking about CD with mp3 files on it) is stored as a sequence of samples... that is to say strictly as a time-domain function.
  • for backups (Score:3, Insightful)

    by bitspotter ( 455598 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @11:52PM (#11580035) Journal
    For backups and archiving, I use hard drives, period.

    I change hard drives every few years, since there's a constant attrition rate, anyhow. Plus they just keep getting BIGER and CHEAPER every year.

    to me, optical media are for sending data to others, not for gathering dust.
  • by Eccles ( 932 ) on Saturday February 05, 2005 @12:20AM (#11580193) Journal
    Is the data really gone, or is it simply the reader that can no longer handle the tolerances? Are the dots truly gone, or just harder to read? It could be that archivists and the rest of us need more tolerant, but slower-reading devices for when we have flaky discs.

    Really, the big advantage stone tablets have is huge amounts of redundancy, but a very small amount of actual data. DVDs could have multiple repetitions of the data on different parts of the disc for fault tolerance.
  • What about CDRW? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Doppler00 ( 534739 ) on Saturday February 05, 2005 @01:31AM (#11580497) Homepage Journal
    My understanding is that CD-RW and DVD-RW doesn't use an "organic" dye, but relies on some physical property of an alloy to determine a one/zero. Are CDRW even more or less susceptible to aging?

    I recently starting going through some of my old CDR's and I noticed that 3 of my 4 CDROM drives had trouble reading a certain disc. I try a 4th drive (DVD+RW), and it reads it just fine. My guess is this means that the disc is starting to die, and now would be a good time to back it up again.
  • Media is fallible... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Kjella ( 173770 ) on Saturday February 05, 2005 @07:48AM (#11581630) Homepage
    ...but the really annoying thing about CDs/DVDs, is that you have no idea that they have failed. You'll only notice when you try to recover. And I haven't found any program that'll let you burn a RAID - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Discs. If you want additional redundancy, you have to meddle around with creating PAR sets and distributing them yourself.

    One small thing, which I've yet to see but maybe some slashdotter can point me to - is there any way, under windows, to automagically mirror a folder on one drive, to another folder (on another drive). I don't mean a full RAID1 of the entire disk, but the few 100mbs that are crucial. Sacrificing 160GB HDD space just for that seems like overkill.

    Kjella

Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!

Working...