Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

DoCoMo to Use Linux on Phones

Posted by CowboyNeal on Thu Nov 18, 2004 06:46 PM
from the coming-to-fruition dept.
Handhelds Software Communications Hardware Linux
highwaytohell writes "News.com.au has an announcement that NTT DoCoMo in collaboration with NEC and Panasonic have developed a Linux based software platform for third generation cell phones. 'The main advantage of the new platform will be easy integration of advanced multi-media applications and efficient use of software,' NEC spokeswoman Akiko Shikimori said." This was first reported about a year ago, but the platform looks to be mostly done by now, and a new press release timed to remind us of its impending release.
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

DoCoMo to Use Linux on Phones 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.

  • Multimedia (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 18 2004, @06:50PM (#10860169)
    The main advantage of the new platform will be easy integration of advanced multi-media applications

    I also want this on my Linux desktop.

    • Multi-media apps? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by PMJ2kx (828679) on Thursday November 18 2004, @06:57PM (#10860228) Journal
      I use my phone for making phone calls, not watching movies. How many people do YOU know who need "multi-media applications" on a phone? Not trying to be a troll hree, but seriously, is it a practical application of technology, or a mere technology/fashon fad? Someone please convince me (Joe Schmoe) why I need it.

      • Why not? (Score:2, Interesting)

        by F'Nok (226987)
        The phone is becoming the portable 'thing' you have with you. I know I like to watch some TV on train, take a photo or video snap and send it to a mate (especially helpful when giving directions), and lets face it... Without a dose of neopets while in the doctors waiting room, I'd get much more irritated than I do. :)

        Are they useful?
        For some, probably not the majority.

        But it's still a good thing. :)

        The worst that can happen is you don't use the features, or buy a vanilla phone. No harm.

      • Re:Multi-media apps? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by BrookHarty (9119) on Thursday November 18 2004, @08:04PM (#10860694) Homepage Journal
        I use my phone for making phone calls, not watching movies. How many people do YOU know who need "multi-media applications" on a phone?

        Humm, I was watching real-tv news on my phone at lunch while I waited for my meal, also watched the news in a waiting room this week.

        During my boss's meeting I was browsing CNN news and local news.

        I did it, because I could. I also have SMS pages, and email pictures I take on the phone.

        Connect via Bluetooth for my wireless headset.

        Depends on your job, but the phone also has video conferencing so I can see servers and cable wiring remotely, comes in handy when we have smart hands (techs working on misc hardware).

        I use it, most people at my work use it. OF course I work for a telco, and we have lots of cool phones. ;)
      • Not trolling either here, but I know of at least one person who got some use out of a multimedia phone. This girl I went out with once had an pointlessly expensive phone that was video-capable. She had video of herself blowing some dude on her phone. This was more of a turn-off to me than anything else (I didn't go out with her again), but documenting sexual escapades would certainly qualify as a use for multimedia apps.
      • I'm not gonna try and convince you, I'm not entirely convinced myself.

        On the other hand I'm addicted to using my PocketPC to read books, especially in bed or en route. I've got a half dozen on it at any time (right now I'm halfway through Ben Bova's so-so "Moonbase 1" potboiler.)

        And to listen to audio books (Jon Stewart's "America", up to Ch. 11.)

        And podcasts (none today.)

        And yes, I've usually got a movie or TV show stored on it to watch - decent quality and great for filling wait time (from last ni

      • Well, in 2-3 years time you'll probably be able to get a 1ghz phone with 512mb ram and 10gb solid state storage.

        Then you'll be complaining that your tv [mythtv.org] doesn't have usb or bluetooth or wifi to transfer recordings onto your phone.
      • I use the Internet on my mobile phone all the time, for general surfing etc, and it would be handy to be able to view movie trailers on it as well when deciding which movie to rent (or get on-demand from satellite TV). Multimedia is not something I do a lot of on PCs either, but occasionally it's fun or simply convenient.
      • Well given the choice between a phone that can do just voice calls and a a phone that can do a lot more, customers buy the latter. From the point of view of phone manufacturers it's quite clear where the money is.

        But you are right, most phones are just expensive toys used mostly for sending text messages and calling other people. I have a very old, unfashionable one which does just that and is light and reliable too.
      • Hey now, what's wrong with fads? Especially if you're filthy rich and can buy it just because? :)

  • 3g? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Folmer (827037) *
    Well.. For now i just stick with my 2g telephone, and uses my laptop and wifi for grapping pr0n :)
    Also 3g is way outdated.. Docomo is enrolling 4g in 2006, and they are already experimenting with 5g coorporating with my university.
    The best use i can see for this is when you connect the phone to a computer, so you can get broadband wherever you are.. (but thats what WiMax was developed for)
    • Great. Another fabulous Japanese phone that I can't use anywhere else in the world. When will the Japanese make their phones compatable with the rest of the world?

      People on Slashdot complain about the U.S. being isolationist when it comes to cell phone technology. It's worse in Japan.

      (BTW: If someone can point me in the direction of a GSM phone that will work in the US, Czech Republic, and Japan, I will be grateful.)
      • There is a sort of strange duality when it comes to Japanese isolationism. One one hand, they use a whole lot of standards that match the ones North America uses (Though I'm surprised NTSC works as well as it does on 50Hz power - I've seen TVs run on single cylinder personal generators and the screen wobbles like crazy as the freqency wavers).

        However, there's the whole cellphone thing, and not to mention the artificially high prices for traveling - even within the country, it's expensive as hell to ride th

      • Are you on crack? (Score:4, Interesting)

        by kryonD (163018) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:06PM (#10861443) Homepage Journal
        "When will the Japanese make their phones compatable with the rest of the world?

        People on Slashdot complain about the U.S. being isolationist when it comes to cell phone technology. It's worse in Japan."

        No it's not!! What universe have you been living in? DoCoMo has been trying to get into the American market for years. It's our own fault for pressuring our government to impose high import tarrifs so we can hold our heads high buying 2nd gen crap "made in the USA". Why in God's green Earth would the Japanese want to downgrade their phones to be compatible with "the rest of the world". As it stands, DoCoMo's i-Mode technology is spreading quite well in parts of Europe, China, and Korea.

        Also, I know for a fact that AU (I think Vodafone bought them last year) has a phone that is capable of roaming pretty much anywhere in the northern hemisphere. I'm also fairly certain that DoCoMo offered a phone with those capabilities, but I had no desire to pay the extra mony and just stuck with my D505i which STILL blows away most of the phones here in the US, even though it's 2nd Gen 2G tech in Japan. I plan on returning to Japan in 2 years and I guarantee my first act after finding a place to live will be to re-acquire a real phone.

        Calling Japan isolationist when it comes to cell phones is like calling Italy isolationist when it comes to Lasagna. If you already produce the best in the world, what exactly do you need to import?
        • Vodafone bought J-Phone which was essentially a second-rate cellphone service over there. With the partnership, though, VOD is pushing some pretty serious upgrades and is adapting the European market to be more like the Japanese keitai market.

          In Europe, you define your phone by the device maker. Nokia, Seimens, etc. They define what the phones will be and how they will function. The operators are along for the ride. Whereas in Japan, the phone is defined by the operator. DoCoMo, Au (KDDI), Vodafone,
      • Japan's phones are mostly using the same tech as the USA (i.e. W-CDMA or CDMA2000, at least in those areas which have upgraded)... just on different frequencies. This is because many of the frequencies used by US phones were already allocated for other uses in Japan. Its the same reason why the US's GSM network is 1.9GHz and the rest of the world's GSM is 1.8GHz (I think... might have that backwards).

        But no worry... you can now buy a number of phones that work on 3G in Japan, and both GSM variants for the
        • As I heard it, NTT deliberately chose frequency bands for their own PDC cellular system (used by DoCoMo and TuKa) that would clash with both GSM and IS-95 (CDMA) in order to protect domestic manufacturers and their own control of telephony. The Japanese government, being the largest shareholder of NTT and somewhat inclined to protectionism, went along with this. Japan did get IS-95 (CDMA) networks (J-Phone/Vodafone and AU) but they use a different frequency from the rest of the world. This protectionism mad

  • So just like current phones. But with Linux? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Kenja (541830) on Thursday November 18 2004, @06:53PM (#10860189)
    I see nothing here that my current Nokia cant do. Is Linux realy that much better a choice then Symbian? Windows and PlamOS I'll grant you due to the whole stylus problem.

    • rather Linux + phone (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Doc Ruby (173196) on Thursday November 18 2004, @07:15PM (#10860365) Homepage Journal
      1> No licensing fees to Symbian
      2> More existing apps, most of them networked, run on Linux
      3> Giant developer community, free dev tools, lots of them
      4> Buzzword compliance

      This is good for Linux (the OS, not just the community), especially. They'll add stylus features that we can use on our desktops (and supercomputers, too, if that's your bent). Though we need not use them, just as we can use Linux with CLI or GUI. Personally, I'd prefer to repalce my mouse (trackball, really) with a stylus (my finger, really), using my keyboard only for fast data entry and email, or just when I feel like it. Linux is the OS that can be that flexible. I'd love to plug the phone into my x86 Linux box USB and use it with the bigger form factor of the bigger box and its peripherals.
      • .. and
        5> much better developement tools
        6> easier API's and libraries
        7> better documentation

        Symbian is really pain in the ass for developers.

        Build system documentation tells how to compile hello world but there is no documentation that helps to understand it if you want to do more things than just compile C/C++ files during your build process.

        And the build tools are bunch of windows .cmd scripts and perl scripts wrapped together, and a few symbian's own exe files doing some binary conversion thin
        • 'Yeah, I guess Symbian, iTron, and EVERY OTHER embedded operating system isn't "flexible".'

          I realize your being sarcastic, but from what I've heard, alot of them aren't, particularly Symbian.

          "we can use Linux with CLI

          Right. On a cell phone."

          Agreed, a geek might like to be able to perform and emergency ssh session to send a hup to restart a service on a server while on vacation. Other than that I can't see it mattering much, except perhaps on a development system that isn't really a cell phone (since li
        • Anonymous retard Coward, try thinking about my post before typing at it. Palm smartphones have touchscreens, and have sold millions. They're very useful. The difference between "fundamentally the same" and "identical" means that some touchscreens (the better ones) have drivers, because they're not identical to mouses. Retard: you say both "Linux doesn't have a touch screen driver" and "there are touch screens available that have Linux drivers" in the same paragraph! Retard. Then your density gets in the way
    • I hear the DoCoMos will give you a command line that can be activated by voice. So when you call your friend you can really mess with their heads by saying "arr emmm arrr efff star"

  • 'The Main Advantage' (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    I think the main advantage will be that when NTT stops supporting these phones, the community can.

    Assuming they're down with the GPL.

  • Yes but... (Score:3, Funny)

    by dfn5 (524972) on Thursday November 18 2004, @06:54PM (#10860195) Journal
    Does it support Ogg Vorbis?

  • Pine? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Doc Ruby (173196) on Thursday November 18 2004, @06:54PM (#10860201) Homepage Journal
    How about a project that emulates PalmOS on Linux? A Linux phone that runs PalmOS apps could eat the lunch of both Palm AND Windows smartphones. Not only would the phone add that many more apps to its offerings to consumers (interesting more of them), but lots of those apps are a lot more friendly to users than Linux apps, as they were developed for small mobile devices. Rather than let PalmOS get crushed by the Windows phone onslaught, let's sacrifice it to the greater glory. Everyone wins but Microsoft. If we're already running Wine, and GBA, how hard could a PalmOS API port be?

    • Re:Pine? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Greyfox (87712) on Thursday November 18 2004, @07:09PM (#10860317) Homepage Journal
      You mean like this? [netmeister.org]

      That thing's been around forever. That's the nice thing about Linux -- you think "Gee wouldn't it be nice if FOO" and when you look, FOO has been around forever.

      • That POSE seems cool, though I can't tell if it will emulate PalmOS5, to say nothing of (upcoming) PalmOS6, or even PalmOS4. Also,

        "in order for you to use POSE to actually emulate a Palm device, you need a ROM image"

        You can get the images from your Palm device, or from joining ($) the Palm developer program.

        BTW, one of the nice things about Slashdot -- you post "gee wouldn't it be nice if FOO", and when you look, someone has posted "FOO [slashdot.org]. And 100 other random monkeys have posted BAR [slashdot.org].

      • I suspect that he means make a version of the Emulator (or the newer Simulator) that is more tightly integrated with the system I don't think you'd necessarily want a Palm device to suddenly appear on your screen, I think you'd want Palm applications to work seamlessly with the other applications on the system. Interesting thought, for sure, and definitely a challenge. The main obstacle would be a legal one, not a technical one -- getting the ROM images to install in the emulator/simulator. Doubt PalmSource

      • POSE requires a Palm ROM to run and doesn't support PalmOS 5 or greater. It's also very slow and buggy (on Linux, at least).
    • Someone's going to think I'm a troll, but PalmOS is really far behind. They developed originally for the low-end hardware systems with slow CPU, no MMU, and very little RAM (e.g., 128kbytes) for OS, applications and user data. This worked well for shoehorning usable applications (datebook, calendar, mail, et cetera) into tiny devices. However, PalmOS is now being asked to do things for which it was never designed.

      Modern devices have fast CPU's (600MHz XScale) lots of RAM (128MB), external storage (e.g.
        • It's too little too late, and everyone knows it. There aren't even any Cobalt (PalmOS 6.1) devices announced. Aparrantly there have been licensees of PalmOS 6 since December 2003, but no devices have been shipped. That's an indication to many including me that the OS is not ready for use in an actual product. It could be the integration/emulation layer for old PalmOS programs. It could be the new desktop synchronization software. It could be the stability of the OS itself. It could be a lot of things

  • So much for Ballmer (Score:5, Interesting)

    by RealAlaskan (576404) on Thursday November 18 2004, @06:55PM (#10860203) Homepage Journal
    So much for Ballmer's threats [theregister.co.uk]. Maybe Microsoft will be the next litigious bastards [sco.com]?

    Q: How can you tell the Titanic is sinking?
    A: They keep rearranging the deck chairs, and reassuring us that the ship is too big to sink.

    • I'm pretty sure Ballmer was bluffing. Talk is cheap, so I think Microsoft will just quietly fold rather than risk another monopoly fine in China or Japan. If they were serious about it, they'd go after IBM.

      Gaah, been watching too much poker on Bravo lately...

  • Scriptable phones (Score:3, Interesting)

    by RedFireGuy (96612) on Thursday November 18 2004, @07:16PM (#10860371)
    Emacs jokes aside, what would be really nice is to have some scripting language backing these phones so I could have the phone be a little smarter about fr'instance when to interrupt me.

    (def ring-loud-p (caller)
    "Checks whether the phone should ring LOUD"
    (if (and (eq 'girlfriend caller)
    (> 10 (getAmbientNoiseLevel))
    t
    nil)) )
    --
    • This is a little off topic, but related to your post. Does anyone know if there are any phones that change the order of words you get using predictive text input based on how often you use them? For example, "home" and "good" are both 4663 - if I use "home" a lot more than "good", I want it to come up with "home" first.

      Does such a thing exist?

      Would anyone like to implement it, patent it and give me free phones for life?
    • Emacs jokes aside, what would be really nice is to have some scripting language backing these phones so I could have the phone be a little smarter about fr'instance when to interrupt me.

      Future S60 phones might ship with Python out-of-the-box; Now it's still in beta phase [mobileburn.com].

      See, the Symbian world isn't as closed as some people think. It's also not as open as some people (managers) think, but that's a different story...
    • I'd write one under the condition that I never, ever, ever, have to see that scripting language again ;)
  • At last I can get my Mozilla Thunderbird email onto a mobile device, albeit by porting Thunderbird to it...

  • Linux - secure telephony? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by mwilliamson (672411) on Thursday November 18 2004, @07:55PM (#10860647) Homepage Journal
    Ok, this is the PERFECT opportunity to introduce and deploy SSL to the telephony world. OpenSSL could first be used to secure (and authenticate) mobile to mobile traffic, then mobile to wireline and even wireline to wireline via inexpensive linux-based SSL "adapters" that could go between your POTS jack and telephone(s). The telephony world could use a good dose of end-user-empowering crypto.

  • DoCoMo Money! Mo Money! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by blueZhift (652272) on Thursday November 18 2004, @07:57PM (#10860660) Homepage Journal
    That's a sweet lookin phone, but I think DoCoMo's primary motivation is to keep the cost of the phone down. Using Linux goes a long way towards lowering the cost, which means mo money for DoCoMo! It also means they have a very flexible platform on which to base future phones. If you make your money selling OS licenses for low end devices like cell phones, cameras, and PDAs, Linux is going to make your life a living hell!
  • As companies are forced to squeeze more and more to make good profits they will trim whatever fat there is. Linu and Tron are both viable alternatives to WinCE or other proprietary embedded systems. And Tron is the biggest success in that field. The guy that invented it, if he had charged 1 cent per copy used he would be a billionaire a few times over by now. I doubt that any house lacks one device that may be powered by Tron.
  • But I was under NDA so I couldn't talk about it.

    Seems like a good Idea, but only if it's done right.

  • ...but do they run Linux?
  • There are already mobile phones equipped with Linux [tuxmobil.org] available. You may also consider to enhance your Linux PDA [tuxmobil.org] with a GSM/GPRS CF-Card. For an example see this report about Linux and the AnyCom GS-320 TriBand GSM/GPRS CF-Card [tuxmobil.org].
  • When the HELL is Docomo going to do something about their sound quality?

    For YEARS it's been painful to try and talk to someone using an NTT Docomo phone. Sometimes you just want to tell them to go to a landline phone.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.