Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Belkin To Offer Firmware Fix For Router Hijacking

Posted by timothy on Mon Nov 10, 2003 08:28 PM
from the testing-the-waters dept.
L-Train8 writes "Belkin has an announcement at the bottom of their homepage about the spam router. They have decided to disable the 'feature' that hijacks a random http request every 8 hours and redirects to a webpage advertising their parental control system. This will require a firmware upgrade. The message says details will be forthcoming. Interestingly, while I was preparing this submission, the message changed. Originally, it included a snippy remark about how what they were doing was not spam, despite what everyone on the internet says. The new version is much less testy."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by henc (671554) * <henc@noSpAM.dtek.chalmers.se> on Monday November 10 2003, @08:29PM (#7440029) Homepage
    Although they remove this feature, what other 'usage statistics'-logging-features are silently embedded?

    My newer D-Link 604 router has some statistics and a thorough logging function (which is displayed in the web gui). - Is all of it really visible to the end user?

    It's a good bet from the manufacturers that the device will be online all the time.
    Perhaps one should install a box to surveil the router/firewall, if any connections are initiated from the router?

    henc
    • by Davak (526912) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:33PM (#7440079) Homepage
      - Installing ads onto a router.
      - Redirecting all non-existant domains to "sitefinder"

      Is this the year for the most stupid marketing ideas on the planet?
      • by Xenographic (557057) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:54PM (#7440259) Homepage Journal
        Don't worry.

        They'll think of something else that's worse, more intrusive, etc. every eighteen months or so.

        I hereby dub this law to be known as "Xeno's law"

        The first corollary is that the average IQ of marketers is thought to be a monotone decreasing function which tends to zero.

        • From the parent post: "... average IQ of marketers ... tends to zero."

          The average IQ of some marketers is less than zero. They are very intelligent in being destructive to their companies, meaning they have a high negative IQ. Deciding to include router hijacking is not something an ignorant person could do.

          The router hijacking idea was a product of considerable creative thinking [slashdot.org]. And Belkin's router project manager Eric Deming made himself semi-famous on Slashdot. Not everyone could do that!

          Thi

          • In case you would like to apply for Mr. Deming's job, it's available [belkin.com]. (Scroll down to "Marketing Manager"). Or, just write careers@belkin.com.

            Of course, Belkin won't accept just anyone. The "right candidate" must be able to "strategize, initiate, and execute". He or she must be able to "drive revenue" and "leverage knowledge" about "end-user sell-thru strategies" and must be able to "align resources" and "translate raw content".
        • by Kwil (53679) on Monday November 10 2003, @09:46PM (#7440639)
          Yet in order to decrease to 0, it first must decrease by half.

          In order to decrease by half it first must decrease by half of that.

          In order to decrease by half of that, it must first decrease by half of that, and so on.

          So it would seem that the IQ can never actually decrease at all.

          This would imply that the IQ must start at 0.

          You could call this something spiffy.. Xeno's Paradox maybe. :)
    • by MisanthropicProggram (597526) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:42PM (#7440157)
      I hope the folks whose expertise is in this area will keep an eye out for any other hanky-panky.

      I really appreciate the folks who spend the time to figure out these things instead of writing it off as little "quirks" or accepting the line from tech support that you have to get "used to the product".

      My brother actually got this line from a Fujitsu tech support guy when he complained that his laptop didn't always read the CD-rom when a new one was inserted and the fact that the laptop didn't shutdown when told to (It would just restart ). - this was in 1999 - BTW.

    • by Bowie J. Poag (16898) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:42PM (#7440162) Homepage
      No, but your D-Link 604 router is a piece of shit.. I should know, I own one too, unfortunately.

      The router allows Windows XP to bypass normal user/administrator authentication on the router, and add entires to the firewall table.. Have a look at the firewall page on the router, and see if there's two entries for "msmsgs" that you didn't make. Ever wonder how those got there, especially in light of the fact your router is supposed to be password protected? Gee, thanks D-Link!

      Concievably, any schmuck out there could easilly write a virus that pollutes the firewall table in the same manner. I'm surprised nobody has done so already.

      • by Tiersten (58773) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:47PM (#7440198)
        Actually, those extra entries are caused by UPNP. It's supposed to automatically add forwarding rules for services running on your local machines.
        The MSN Messenger protocol requires you to listen to certain ports and if you're behind a NAT firewall then it doesn't work properly so it uses UPNP. From what I gather, anything which knows about UPNP can request ports to be opened.

        It's not a specific thing from D-Link. A lot of new routers now support it.
        • by Bowie J. Poag (16898) on Monday November 10 2003, @09:01PM (#7440315) Homepage
          ..Which is still an exploit.

          Keep in mind, when these "msmsgs" (Which I think is the spam-happy Microsoft Messaging service, not MSN Messenger) entries pop up, they occupy HUGE swathes of IP space. Literally, tens of thousands of ports.

          I originally noticed this problem while playing RTCW. Periodically, I wouldn't be able to log on to any servers, because the goddamn msmsgs entries in the firewall table would encompass the port range where RTCW servers reside (port 27000-30000 or so)... Huge areas of IP space, sometimes >20000 ports wide.

          Did I mention you cant delete these "msmsgs" entries?

          Yup. Not only are they added to the firewall table without your permission, you cant get rid of them. The only way you can remove those entries is by restoring factory defaults and rebooting. It took me 4 or 5 repetitions of this process to figure out what the fuck was going on.

          D-Link, if you're listening, fix your goddamn router.
            • Right! I always make sure UPNP is disabled on every XP box I set up. I can't really see good reasons for the service to be there - and I recall people complaining about the security holes it created back when it was first released to the public.

              I'm just a little bit surprised routers are actually making use of it now. I guess it's all about pressure put on them to make it easier for people to run special services from multiple computers (since NAT firewalls make you redirect traffic to one specific IP o
            • by Bowie J. Poag (16898) on Tuesday November 11 2003, @02:25AM (#7442051) Homepage
              Thank you.

              I just wish there was a more adequate explanation of UPnP in the manual. Here's a copy of it, taken directly from the manual:

              "UPnP is short for Universal Plug and Play which is a networking architecture that provides compatibility among networking equipment, software, and peripherals. The DI-604 is a UPnP enabled router and will only work with other UPnP devices/softwares. If you do not want to use the UPnP functionality, it can be disabled by selecting "Disabled".

              It should read:

              "Leaving this stupid fucking feature on leaves you bent-over and spread-cheeked for when a piece of malicious software comes along decides block every damn port on our router. UPnP allows changes to be made without your knowledge OR consent--it allows any program to totally bypass user/admin authentication. As an added bonus, entries commited via this backdoor^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H"feature" cant' be removed without first factory-defaulting the whole goddamn router and rebooting it. Anyway, Microsoft wants us to put it here and leave it on by default. Click the box to disable it."

              I think my explanation is much clearer, don't you? :)

        • A lot of new routers support UPnP because it reduces support calls, not because it's a really good idea for a router to support UPnP.

          The disguise of convienience for the home user at the cost of security (which the poor bastard doesn't even know he's giving up)to save the manufacturer the expense and pain in the ass of telling him how to properly configure the device.

          The fact that it allows devices and apps to open their own outgoing doors without asking permission is just icing on the cake for the manufa
      • It's on Tools->Misc.

  • I've got a fix... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Dimensio (311070) <darkstarNO@SPAMiglou.com> on Monday November 10 2003, @08:29PM (#7440032)
    ...It involves a hatchet.

    Seriously, Belkin's response to this has been utterly abysmal. First they tried to justify it, only now that it's blowing up in their face do they try to remedy it.

    They've lost a great deal of trust that they will never regain.
    • by Davak (526912) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:38PM (#7440124) Homepage
      Honestly, this is the most stupid thing since TurboTax decided to write to the boot sector. [slashdot.org]

      Will anybody affected ever buy TurboTax Again?
      You think anybody will buy Belkin after this act of stupidity?

      These companies just need a couple dozen average slashdot-type geeks to filter their ideas through. We would weed a lot of this stupid crap out. Hell, they could have just posted the idea in the newsgroup and watched the flames pour in.

      Somebody will get fired over this...

      Davak
    • by Shakrai (717556) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:43PM (#7440168) Journal
      They've lost a great deal of trust that they will never regain.

      Sure, among uber-geeks and /.'ers. John Q. Public who purchased these Routers was doubtless annoyed by it, but John Q. Public who is still in the market and who (likely) hasn't heard about it will still consider buying Belken products.

      Two questions/points would spring to mind:

      1) I pity the poor Level 1 techs at Belken who are going to have to walk all the Mom & Pop users through flashing the firmware.
      2) I wonder how many units are still sitting on store shelves with the old firmware in them? This could haunt Belken for quite some time yet.

      Personally, I have experience with Linksys, Belken and Netgear NAT routers. I'll be sticking with my Duron based $250 Linux box and iptables :) So what if it uses 50+ kilowatt hours of power a month ;)

        • by Shakrai (717556) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:56PM (#7440275) Journal
          To flash the firmware on most routers, you just login to some web interface and click the "update firmware" option.

          What's a web interface? How do I login? Where do I type in that address? What's number lock? Do I need to plug the router in first? If I unplugged the router by accident in the middle of the upgrade am I in trouble?

          Sorry, again, "I pity the poor Level 1 techs at Belken who are going to have to walk all the Mom & Pop users through flashing the firmware".

          (And yes before I'm modded flamebait that was the disgruntled ramblings of a former Level 1 support tech ;)

            • by Shakrai (717556) on Monday November 10 2003, @09:04PM (#7440340) Journal
              Err, I get your point, but really... "what's a web interface?". Why would they be buying a router if they don't know what the web is?

              The web? Isn't that like AOL?

              Sorry, that was too easy. I should probably lose some of my cynicism :P It's been reinforced too much by end users.

              In all seriousness though, I think "web interface" would confuse them, whereas if you said "We are going to a special webpage in Internet Explorer" or something along those lines you'd have better luck. Or maybe not. Never underestimate the stupidity of an end-user....

            • If you can't walk someone through typing http://myrouter in their address bar and clicking the "install updates" option, you probably weren't a very good support tech.

              You entirely missed the point of my original comment, which was "I pity the poor Level 1....." Just because you can do it, doesn't mean you want to. Give me 5 or 10 minutes I can walk just about anybody through doing anything. That doesn't mean I enjoy doing so.

              My point being, that the Belken tech support ppl (or whoever they outsource it

  • by Evil Adrian (253301) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:30PM (#7440047) Homepage
    "Important message from Belkin:
    We at Belkin apologize for the recent trouble our customers have experienced with the wireless router/browser redirect issue. We will be offering firmware fixes available for download early next week. We do not have exact details yet but we can tell you now that each Router's firmware that incorporates Parental Control as an option will be changed.

    Please expect more detailed information to follow early next week. Thank you."

    If anyone has the testy version, post that too! I'm curious.
    • From the google cache [google.com]

      "Belkin is aware of some recent postings that claim that Belkin wireless routers are spamming users during the setup process and periodically thereafter. It is not now, nor has it ever been, the policy of Belkin to intentionally spam our customers or anyone else. Belkin offers a free trial of our parental control feature in our routers, and to make our customers aware of the feature itself and to give them the opportunity to take advantage of the free trial, we have tried to direct users to the information regarding the parental control features. However, since this has become a source of concern to our users, and it is Belkin policy to address the concerns of our users quickly, Belkin has decided to remove this function from the routers. Each router's firmware that incorporates parental control as an option will be changed.

      Please expect more detailed information to follow early next week. Thank you."
  • by tribes (613022) * on Monday November 10 2003, @08:31PM (#7440052)
    Go go, Google cache [216.239.53.104]!

    Kharma whoring for fun and profit....

  • by AEton (654737) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:32PM (#7440068)

    cache here [216.239.37.104] (as of 10 Nov 2003 20:43 EST):

    Belkin is aware of some recent postings that claim that Belkin wireless routers are spamming users during the setup process and periodically thereafter. It is not now, nor has it ever been, the policy of Belkin to intentionally spam our customers or anyone else. Belkin offers a free trial of our parental control feature in our routers, and to make our customers aware of the feature itself and to give them the opportunity to take advantage of the free trial, we have tried to direct users to the information regarding the parental control features. However, since this has become a source of concern to our users, and it is Belkin policy to address the concerns of our users quickly, Belkin has decided to remove this function from the routers. Each router's firmware that incorporates parental control as an option will be changed.

    • by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Tuesday November 11 2003, @12:44AM (#7441653)
      Here's some more interesting things for the record.

      The origional reply from Eric Deming ("a product manager for Belkin's LAN products and ... very involved with the development of the Parental Control feature") to news.admin.net-abuse.email was removed. Oddly enough. However you can find mirrored copies re-inserted in to Google Groups thanks to:

      Malev [google.com]
      Clifton T. Sharp Jr. [google.com]
      dave [google.com]

      And even a simple text mirror outside Google's domain provided by Steven J Sobol [stevesobol.com].

      The removed message was replaced by a very familiar sounding post again from Eric Deming. Google Groups currently has its own copy available [google.com] (at the time of this writing). But others have already began the process of burying [google.com] the text - probably due to previous experience.

      Of course - if all these sources fail you... you can always find the same text burried in reader comments from the initial Slashdot article mentioned in this article's submission.
  • by L-Train8 (70991) <Matthew_Hawk&hotmail,com> on Monday November 10 2003, @08:33PM (#7440077) Homepage Journal
    I was in the process of cutting and pasting Belkin's message into a story submission earlier today when it changed, so I have the original text. The message earlier today read:

    Belkin is aware of some recent postings that claim that Belkin wireless routers are spamming users during the setup process and periodically thereafter. It is not now, nor has it ever been, the policy of Belkin to intentionally spam our customers or anyone else. Belkin offers a free trial of our parental control feature in our routers, and to make our customers aware of the feature itself and to give them the opportunity to take advantage of the free trial, we have tried to direct users to the information regarding the parental control features. However, since this has become a source of concern to our users, and it is Belkin policy to address the concerns of our users quickly, Belkin has decided to remove this function from the routers. Each router's firmware that incorporates parental control as an option will be changed.

    Please expect more detailed information to follow early next week. Thank you.


    Now we have the more concise and concilliatory

    We at Belkin apologize for the recent trouble our customers have experienced with the wireless router/browser redirect issue. We will be offering firmware fixes available for download early next week. We do not have exact details yet
    but we can tell you now that each Router's firmware that incorporates Parental Control as an option will be changed.

    Please expect more detailed information to follow early next week. Thank you.


    • by Humba (112745) * on Monday November 10 2003, @09:33PM (#7440548)
      We apologise for the fault in the router. Those responsible have been sacked.

      Mynd you, moose bites Kan be pretty nasti...

      We apologise again for the fault in the router. Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.

      --Humba
      • by Drishmung (458368) on Monday November 10 2003, @09:19PM (#7440454)
        It's a very common attitude: that spam is something that other people do. Our advertising is valuable and desirable and can't possibly be spam, so different rules apply.

        It is really, really basic. It's a form of the Golden Rule. "Would this be acceptable to us if someone did it to us?" Or, "would our customers find this acceptable if another company did it?"

        The marketing types responsible for this are demonstrably liabilities to Belkin and should be dismissed. As if...

  • by Evil Adrian (253301) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:33PM (#7440078) Homepage
    Here's an article [com.com] about it from about 7 hrs ago.

    Here's an article about their stupid response [dslreports.com].

    Here's the original Slashdot article [slashdot.org].
  • by toupsie (88295) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:33PM (#7440081) Homepage
    I am in the market for a small home DSL router and now that Belkin is completely out of the running, what would you choose? I would love one with SNMP monitoring. I currently have an old LinkSys 4 port-er. 802.11g would be nice to have on it. Any suggestions?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 10 2003, @08:34PM (#7440094)
    Every 8 hours you get redirected to a page saying "Sorry, we won't do it again. Promise."
  • by fleener (140714) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:39PM (#7440135)
    I have a Belkin for my home. Upon setting up the equipment, the advert page was the first one I saw. I skipped it, but encountered it again about a (?) week later. That time I actually read it and realized I had to jump through a hoop to never see the page again. I can't imagine managing a computer lab and taking more than a day to notice the advert.

    Yes, I was annoyed, but no more than from mandatory product registrations or e-mails I receive from e-tailers from whom I've bought something. In the grand scheme of things, I'm used to the abuse. Today's standard practice is to let the customer opt-out after the first annoying sales pitch.

    I honestly was surprised to see this issue posted on /. as a discussion topic. I accept it as the way companies act today, nothing unusual.
    • by herrvinny (698679) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:48PM (#7440211)
      The problem is, you do accept it so willingly. You shouldn't have to deal with this. Nobody should have to.

      Advertising shouldn't be on a product that is paid for. The router should do only one thing: route packets. Anything else, if it drops packets, rewrites packets (which it does), etc, then it doesn't work properly, and a complaint to Belkin is in order, along with a request for an RMA#. If the router is designed not to work properly (as it seems), then we need to file a report with the FTC.
    • by L-Train8 (70991) <Matthew_Hawk&hotmail,com> on Monday November 10 2003, @09:13PM (#7440397) Homepage Journal
      I accept it as the way companies act today, nothing unusual.

      This is what is really bad, and why Belkin thought they could get away with this crap. We have become used to the abuse. We need to stand up and say, "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it anymore!"

      The incredibly onerous and annoying contracts that have become standard parts of software licenses are starting to creep out of the fine print of click-through EULA's that no one ever reads and into everyday life. I think hardware companies look enviously at software companies, with their "no responsiblity for the company/no rights for the user" legal disclaimers. They are increasingly trying to get the same kind of weasely deals for themselves.

      But actual physical products are a different animal, and you can't hide how you're screwing the customer behind an "agree" button. If EULA's weren't such confusing legalese, and people actually bothered to understand what they are actually "agreeing" to, I believe we'd all make a bigger stink about it. Fortunately, it's more obvious when physical items try to act like virtual ones.
  • by Kentamanos (320208) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:43PM (#7440165)
    Sorry if everyone's seen it already, just saw someone post it on another messageboard I read.

    UserFriendly ad [userfriendly.org]
  • The damage is done (Score:4, Insightful)

    by bnavarro (172692) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:45PM (#7440179)
    I use an old Pentium computer as a Linux router for my cable modem; I was an early adopter of broadband, before these router devices were affordable.

    I had considered switching over to one of these devices (I have periodic problems with the hard disk failing, and I am running out of small hard disk replacements for it :-( ), but after seeing this little stunt, no way. I won't trust any router that I can't program myself now. When my Packard Hell quits, I'm gonna just buy another old used computer and turn it into a Linux router.

    I would strongly urge anyone else savvy with Linux or even *BSD administration to strongly consider this route. Belkin just proved that you can't trust anyone to route your data with a "black box" solution. OK, maybe not Cisco, but are you gonna fork over $10k for a home router? ;-)

    (Yes I know Cisco just bought Linksys; I still won't trust 'em)
  • by WolfWithoutAClause (162946) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:46PM (#7440196) Homepage
    The bottom line of this is that this feature was good for the producer, and bad for the customer (potentially very bad if it messes up something on an intranet).

    Trouble is, we buy products because it is good for us, not good for the manufacturer. They seem to have lost sight of it, although may have realised their mistake (or equally likely they haven't realised it, but it's just they dislike the bad publicity).

    Either way, it speaks volumes of their corporate decision making. In my experience, corporate decision making is at best, of highly variable quality; managers try to come up with just slightly too clever schemes that try to raise profits at the (non financial) expense of the customer. These things add negative qualities to the product. Why would you ever want to do that?

  • by FearUncertaintyDoubt (578295) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:47PM (#7440199)
    The message that is currently running on their web site was actually what they originally posted on their site on Friday night, when they started to realize the uproar that they had provoked (and posted this message to the usenet [slashdot.org]).

    Then, either Saturday or Sunday, they changed it to the far less likable one, which was much closer to Eric Deming's original reply in the usenet thread (which, oddly enough, was deleted from google groups). The problem is that it seemed more that they were trying to spin than acknowledge the problem. Methinks that they went back to the first version because they realized that they couldn't spin it at all.

  • by swordgeek (112599) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:51PM (#7440235) Journal
    Belkin has lost my business, until they very aggressively do something to FIX the problems of the internet.

    All that backing off here is doing, is admitting that they pushed a bit too hard. Nobody can tell me that the goal of Belkin has changed, or is any different from VeriSign's. They want to manipulate the infrastructure of the internet. They want control over my computer, and how it works.

    Fuck 'em. They have to REALLY work hard to win back my business. Apologizing and issuing a firmware patch ain't good enough by half.
  • by PHPee (559830) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:58PM (#7440294) Homepage
    Like many fellow Slashdotters, I emailed several different people/departments at Belkin, expressing my disappointment with their new "feature". I received the following canned response today, from Eric Pipkin, an Account Manager at Belkin:
    Rob,


    Please refer to attachment below in regards to your email.

    Thnx.
    The email contained a 119k pdf file attachment, which I actually found on the Belkin website by adding the filename to the end of the belkin.com URL. Here's a link to the pdf file I received: http://www.belkin.com/Belkin_parental-control.pdf [belkin.com]

    It doesn't really tell us anything new, except that Belkin seems to be missing the point entirely, defending their "feature" and not mentioning anything about any upcoming firmware fixes.
  • by G4from128k (686170) on Monday November 10 2003, @08:59PM (#7440298)
    Corporate behavior like this drives me insane. The personal labor cost to fix their defective product exceeds the price of the product. But I'm sure the EULA is careful to explain that the product is not necessarily useful for anything and Belkin is liable for nothing beyond the price of the product.
  • by austad (22163) on Monday November 10 2003, @09:02PM (#7440324) Homepage
    I went shopping for a laptop bag yesterday. I really liked this Belkin one I found, but decided not to buy it solely because of their little router spamming escapade. I won't buy Belkin products anymore.

    The sooner hardware manufacturers realize that pulling stunts like this results in some sort of backlash which affects their bottom line, the better.
    • by Shakrai (717556) on Monday November 10 2003, @09:15PM (#7440419) Journal
      The sooner hardware manufacturers realize that pulling stunts like this results in some sort of backlash which affects their bottom line, the better.

      Hey, not to rise to Belken's defense (because I'm not too hip on their products.... got a dead USB hub from them once... and a dead USB add-on card a week later, both RMA'ed and replaced thou, but still...), but does anybody seriously think this was an intentional stunt?

      More likely then not, this was the brainchild of some idiot in marketing, who will probably lose his job over it. One of those ideas that looks great on paper and blows up in your face when released to the world. It's happened to all of us at one point or another (though probably not to this scale).

      Now that doesn't excuse the initial statement on the website defending the feature. But again, that was probably the brainchild of some idiot in PR saying "We can't admit we made a mistake". Fortunately, it seems that smarter heads prevailed in this case.

  • Revised Email Sig (Score:3, Informative)

    by Bob9113 (14996) on Monday November 10 2003, @10:03PM (#7440757) Homepage
    Following is my revised email sig, part of which is stolen from a +5 rated message from the last story. Keep the pressure on folks. As Microsoft has so clearly demonstrated, preventing further harm from one specific act is not enough to dissuade new and more creative despicable acts by malicious corporations. Companies must realized that it is not enough to say you're sorry (particularly when you have your fingers crossed behind your back). We don't let criminals who have malice aforethought get away with "I'm Sorry". We should not be any more lenient with malicious corporations.

    Belkin (verb) - To surreptitiously alter a product in such a fashion that legitimate use is hijacked to the benefit of the manufacturer or associated beneficiaries, usually in a crass self-promoting fashion.
    "I installed topdesk and it belkined my browser."
    "VeriSign's SiteFinder belkined the .com and .net TLDs."

    Belkin products are broken as designed. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/07/174020 5

    Belkin has recanted and claims they will issue a patch. Good. Now all they have to do for me to remove this .sig is to pay their pennance. Backing down is not enough, I require satisfaction. May I suggest a $100,000 donation to the EFF?
  • by Pepebuho (167300) on Tuesday November 11 2003, @02:24AM (#7442049) Homepage
    The Belkin router had not only a non compliant routing algorithm, but it had also a backdoor. Remember, if you clicked on "No Thanks", then a flag INSIDE THE ROUTER would be modified to disallow the misbehavior. Namely CLICKING AN EXTERNAL WEBPAGE MODIFIED THE INSIDES OF YOUR ROUTER!!!!! Is Belkin fixing this security hole also?

  • Instant poll:

    Who smoked the most crack in 2003?

    (_) SCO
    (_) Belkin
    (_) Verisign
    (_) CowboyNeal
    (_) *A
    (_) All of the above

    • by Svartalf (2997) on Monday November 10 2003, @11:14PM (#7441194) Homepage
      1) This is not software, nor did it need drivers to work. There should be no "No thanks" 'button'- period.

      2) What if you're NOT using a browser for your applications? What if you're using SOAP or XML-RPC for something? In either of those cases, Belkin's little advert thing will BREAK things.

      3) When I install software, I don't get ads about new products when I'm installing. This includes GAMES.

      I don't care HOW you'd like to rationalize it- what Belkin did was way over the top stupid.