Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Home-Grown TiVo Stories?

Posted by timothy on Mon Apr 21, 2003 05:44 PM
from the cheap-and-perfect-preferred dept.
PolyDwarf writes "I'm in the process of figuring out how I'm going to build a homegrown TiVo machine (i.e. a computer sitting next to or in my home electronics stack). My question for is "What's worked best for you?" Most solutions I've researched are great if you have regular cable. However, satellite systems and digital cable boxes seem to present a special challenge, in that the software on the PC needs to know about an IR connector that is then hooked up to the front of the digital cable/satellite box. Who has done a solution like what I'm researching? What cases/processors/memory/TV Card/IR transceiver/OS/software/etc worked out for you? Did the end result justify the pain and hassle?"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Freevo and linux (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 21 2003, @05:47PM (#5776638)
    Freevo and linux have been working pretty well for me. Just setup xmltv and go.
  • Mini-ITX form factor (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 21 2003, @05:48PM (#5776650)
    A great place to look for small form factor machines is over at mini-itx.com [mini-itx.com], great small form factor stuff. For software, freshmeat.net and a bit of scripting is your friend :D
  • mythtv (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 21 2003, @05:48PM (#5776651)
    mythtv.org looks promissing, version 0.8 works well, dunno about the receiver stuff as I just have cable.
    • Re:mythtv (Score:5, Informative)

      by Col. Klink (retired) (11632) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:07PM (#5776839)
      Yes, I'm very happy with mythtv. With the 0.8 release, it's split between a front-end and a back-end. You can record all your programs on one machine and watch the recordings (or live TV) from any front-end machine, even if the front-end machine doesn't have a tuner card of its own.

      Mythtv also has hooks to execute any command you desire to change the channels. Plus a web front-end (mythweb) for viewing program info and recording a program or deleting old recordings.

      It doesn't recommend stuff for you to watch and it won't think you're gay if you tape Will & Grace.
    • HDTV (Score:4, Informative)

      by WatertonMan (550706) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:23PM (#5776952)
      I couldn't tell if it supports HDTV though. There are several HDTV feeds out now and several PCI HDTV capture/play cards. It seems like a nice intermediate step towards full HDTV. I get a multimedia computer which plays/records HDTV either to a monitor capable of the resolution or to a TV where some card downscales it.

      After downloading episodes of 24, Alias, and Smallville which were in HDTV format I really am a believer in it. Fantastic looking, even on my 17" monitor.

      Unfortunately the software with the PCI cards I've seen aren't that great and are Windows only. (Sadly none are yet available for my Mac)

  • Read avs forums (Score:5, Informative)

    by scootr1 (159749) on Monday April 21 2003, @05:49PM (#5776658)
    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/forumdisplay.php?s= &forumid=26

    They'll be your friend.

    Regular cable is best, just because of TV tuner cards.

    Also check out http://www.mythtv.com if you want to go the linux route.
  • My setup (Score:5, Informative)

    by Kallahar (227430) <kallahar@quickwired.com> on Monday April 21 2003, @05:50PM (#5776663) Homepage
    I have an old Celeron 433 with an STB TVPCI (BT848 chipset). For software I'm running IULabs IUVCR (their site seems to be down) which changes the channel and sets all the encoding options. Everything captures to AVI, which I then play on that computer or any other on the network (nothing has TV out yet)

    For scheduling everything is run through the MS Task Scheduler and is under manual control.

    Travis
  • Buy a Tivo (Score:3, Insightful)

    by pgrote (68235) on Monday April 21 2003, @05:50PM (#5776664) Homepage
    How many of these topics will we see?

    They are $200 and you save time, money and effort. Even the geek effect isn't worth it this time.

    Spend the money and help a company.

    Here's a list of sites that can help if you're married to doing this:
    Freevo [sourceforge.net]
    XMLTV [membled.com]
    • You cannot watch XVID, DIVX, real streams, or wmp streams using your TIVO.
      • Re:Buy a Tivo (Score:5, Insightful)

        by elmegil (12001) on Monday April 21 2003, @05:59PM (#5776758) Homepage Journal
        And you will be stuck paying a monthly fee to the service provider until they go out of business, you may be locked into firmware upgrades which may restrict your ability to do things like skipping commercials, etc.

        Personally, I prefer the idea of building something that I know I have full rights to modify as I see fit and don't have to pay perpetual fees for.

      • Re:Buy a Tivo (Score:5, Insightful)

        by merlyn (9918) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:04PM (#5776807) Homepage Journal
        You also don't get the quality of the program guide if you don't buy a TiVo and subscribe to their service. I've seen the public ones. No other guide service comes close to what I get from my TiVo.
        • Re:Buy a Tivo (Score:4, Informative)

          by billmaly (212308) <.ten.asudoelcm. .ta. .ylam.llib.> on Monday April 21 2003, @08:15PM (#5777654)
          I have got to second this!! The Tivo box (hardware) is great, no complaints. But, where the whole idea really shines is in the software/UI/program guide marraige. The way TiVo allows me to search for shows, select alt. viewing times, specify recording quality, the whole package, really and truly makes it worth the $13 a month for the service. Home rolled is nice and all, but for the time and money you will expend, you will not grow a TiVo clone..not even close. Do yourself the favor, buy a TiVo, check it out...if I am wrong, take it back and get your money back, One of the best devices I ever bought!!
    • Re:Buy a Tivo (Score:5, Informative)

      by oGMo (379) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:15PM (#5776901)
      They are $200 and you save time, money and effort. Even the geek effect isn't worth it this time.

      It took me at most an hour to hack up a script to record using Ruby [ruby-lang.org] and mp1e [sourceforge.net] from RTE. Here it is [nwlink.com], and here's a sample listing [nwlink.com]. Real hard. Not. It finds dupes, conflicts, and can easily support multiple cards just by running multiple instances.

      Granted, it doesn't track showtime changes, and it's not fancy at all. But it gets the job done, it was easy to write, it's easy to modify, and it's been recording all the TV I watch for the past few months without a hitch. It cost me an hour of my time.

      Spend the money and help a company.

      Why would I want to do that? TiVo isn't exactly a "nice" company, either. It might be one thing if these came with open specs for modification, pulling the files off and burning them, and modifying the source to do what I want. But they don't. And they won't.

      Here's a list of sites that can help if you're married to doing this:

      How could you forget MythTV [mythtv.org], particularly when Freevo is just a ripoff of MythTV source?

      • Re:Buy a Tivo (Score:4, Informative)

        by grungeKid (4260) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:37PM (#5777062) Homepage

        How could you forget MythTV [mythtv.org], particularly when Freevo is just a ripoff of MythTV source?


        That's bullshit, Freevo and MythTV have completely separate codebases (Freevo is built using python + some C parts for display), MythTV is built on C++ and QT.

    • by earthforce_1 (454968) <earthforce_1@ya h o o.com> on Monday April 21 2003, @07:20PM (#5777304) Journal
      I live in Canada - TiVo is not supported here, for love or money. Besides, I would prefer a totally DRM free and open, networkable appliance. I am really looking forward to seeing HDTV and time-shifting support.

      I wish these open source projects would pool their efforts - I hate to see duplication of effort between Myth TV and Freevo.
  • by Naikrovek (667) <jjohnson@NosPaM.psg.com> on Monday April 21 2003, @05:50PM (#5776666) Homepage
    they're not THAT expensive, and its probably not worth the effort at all to try and duplicate all that functionality.

    I suppose its one thing if you want to do this for the purposes of learning how to do it, but if you're going to build it to try and save money, just buy a tivo. you're going to wind up spending as much or more money and a LOT of time fine-tuning everything to your preference, and working out little bugs with a self-built solution.

    so, unless this is a project that's more about the journey than the destination, get a tivo.
    • by falser (11170) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:02PM (#5776782) Homepage
      Yup, don't go the homebrew route if you want to save money and have a robust, simple, solution. I'm in the process of building a freevo/mythtv box. It's a lot of work to get the drivers working, I'm getting poor performance with an AMD 1.4GHz machine, and the software is not ready for prime time. The remote control that comes with the Leadtek Winfast TV2000 is a little flakey - it works, but not all the buttons are functional under Linux. Overall it's just one big expensive pain in the butt.

      There are only a few reasons that you might really want to go this route:

      1) you already have the spare parts you need
      2) you live outside the US where Tivo is unavailable
      3) you like spending lots of time getting stuff to work in Linux
      4) you absolutely need the extra functionality that Tivo does not give (DVD burning, network capability etc.)

      Otherwise, Tivo with the unlimited subscription is cheaper and less hassle.
      • by J. Tang (16252) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:48PM (#5777134)
        Just a note to people who still want to have fun hacking away: TiVos run a custom Linux kernel on a PowerPC board. Those lucky enought with a Series 1 TiVo can hack it the kernel to do stuff like providing a bash prompt or run a web server. Those with a Series 2 with Home Media Option (HMO) can write all sorts of applets to their hearts contents; see www.tivo.com/developer to download the API.

        To the original poster: Is it really worth it to build your own system if you reside within the TiVo market? Have you considered things like: hardware costs (a fast processor, video capture board, lots of RAM, motherboard, case), software (time to get the kernel + driver working, time to cobble together a UI), and other intangibles (getting a remote to work, fan noise, getting timely scheduling information)?
      • by stickyc (38756) on Monday April 21 2003, @08:21PM (#5777691) Homepage
        if you want to save money and have a robust, simple, solution

        Don't underestimate the importance of this paragraph. It's one thing to have your desktop machine, which you futz around with constantly go on the fritz, but when you've had a really long shitty day and just wanna sit down and veg in front of a home-made Futurama marathon, the last thing you want is a blank screen with no clue what's going on.

      • by LoadStar (532607) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:58PM (#5777207)

        Just to correct/clarify a few of your points...

        • Standalone: $13 monthly fee, or $249 product lifetime. DirecTiVo: $4.99 monthly fee, no product lifetime available.
        • If TiVo goes out of business, they have promised to release a "boatanchor" code to the public to allow TiVos to continue to function.
        • TiVo will not record the same episode of a show within a 28 day period, unless the user overrides this feature manually, or the episode guide information is missing/incorrect.
        • TiVo will delete episodes to free space for new recordings, unless marked "Save Until I Delete." If "SUID" is selected, that episode will not be deleted unless manually deleted by the user. Number of people using the TiVo is irrelevant - if one person deletes the episode without checking with the other, that's not TiVo's fault. And TiVo will delete shows not marked SUID regardless of if 0, 1, 2, or more people have watched the episode.
        • Correct - there are no "dual tuner" TiVo's compatible with cable or "over the air." You can, however, record one program while watching another pre-recorded show without a problem.
        • TiVo requires a phone line, or you can use an internal NIC for Series I units, or a USB NIC for Series II units. See the TiVo Community Forum for details.
        • It's only marginally harder to add space to a TiVo than it is to add space to a "roll your own" PVR. The only additional step required is to "bless" the drive, and you can purchase pre-blessed drives on the internet.
      • by amuro98 (461673) on Monday April 21 2003, @07:17PM (#5777294)
        Why pay the monthly fee? Pay the lifetime fee and be done with it. Besides, it's cheaper.

        If Tivo does go out of business, I can continue using my Tivo as a "dumb" PVR. I just won't have the guide or the features it enabled.

        Tivo does remember what it's recorded - to a point. If the same episode (description, etc.) shows up within a certain amount of time, Tivo won't re-record it. You can also tell Tivo not to record reruns. Unfortunatly this relies on the guide data being accurate - something that many of the channels don't do (Comedy Central is particularly bad with The Daily Show, for instance.)

        Yes, the multiple people & 1 Tivo problem comes up a lot. Still, what product is perfect? Both Tivo and users have come up with workarounds while Tivo tries to figure out how to solve this.

        You can get your Tivo to use your network connection instead. In fact, Tivo prefers this as it's cheaper for them than having your unit call in everyday.

        For adding storage, it took me an hour - most of which was spent waiting for the disk copy to finish mirroring the Tivo software from the small 30GB drive, to the larger 60GB drive I bought. Later, I bought a 100GB drive, formatted it, stuck into the Tivo, and the Tivo did the rest. Ooh, that was "hard." Yes, you do have to open the case, and you will violate your warranty doing this, but I fail to see how this is "hard" - especially among a group of folks who can probably assemble PCs while blindfolded and asleep.
  • To stave off all the wankers sure to fire up with their superior "I don't watch TV!" pablum, here's the obligatory theonion.com article [theonion.com]. Grow up, folks. There's plenty of quality programming out there and PVR's (TiVo included) are a great tool to filter the good stuff out from the worthless programming. Avoiding television because you don't like Survivor is like staying off the Internet because AOL is here. It just means you're incapable of scrutiny.
  • by jd142 (129673) on Monday April 21 2003, @05:55PM (#5776727) Homepage
    http://www.ramelectronics.net/html/HTPC.html [ramelectronics.net]. Found it this morning for the earlier discussion.
  • by Sheetrock (152993) on Monday April 21 2003, @05:56PM (#5776736) Homepage Journal
    I've looked into setting up something like this myself. I thought it'd be pretty cool to run a PVR using Linux with MythTV, but there are a number of issues that make it impractical.

    First, I'm not sure at all what components to pick up for such an endeavor. Linux only seems to run the high-end stuff with any level of reliability, which begs the question of whether or not it is worth building something like this with Free Software if the hardware costs are enormous. But the overhead of using open source code rather than software written by the companies making the hardware evidently shows.

    Second, trying to find a decent remote control for something like this seems pretty hard. I've heard of various solutions, but all seem to involve familiarity with device drivers and writing your own glue code. Not fun.

    Then there is the sound card issue. Windows seems to make Dolby output easy, but just getting the sound card to run at all can be an issue under Linux. I run two -- one off the motherboard (through ALSA) and a Sound Blaster Live! through OSS, and I can't change the mixer settings on the Live! card. On Windows, it just detected everything and it worked.

    So in conclusion, it seems like such a project might be feasible, but I don't know if it would be worth the time and investment. TiVos don't cost as much as I could see spending in time and money to homebrew a Linux solution. If you're looking for something even more powerful than a TiVo, you might as well sink the money into a Windows Media Center PC. These things will handle just about anything you throw at them.

  • MythTV is great (Score:5, Interesting)

    by foom (29095) on Monday April 21 2003, @05:58PM (#5776746) Homepage
    I just built myself a new MythTV (www.mythtv.org) box a few weeks ago with the following hardware:
    Shuttle SK41G case+MB+PSU - $250
    120GB Maxtor Fluid Dynamic Bearings 5400RPM HD - $130
    WinTV dbx model 401 card - $100
    Athlon 1800+ (I did not need to get this fast a processor, but I wanted speed left over for other things too) - $60
    512MB DDR ram: $70
    New remote control: $20
    Total: $630

    It works great, does ff/rew/pause of live TV, downloads TV listings off free websites, lets you record all showings of a show, has a webserver builtin so you can set recordings remotely, etcetc.

    It also looks pretty and works great with a remote control so you really can use it like a set top box.

    There are even optional modules for showing the weather, playing MP3s, and running various emulators/games.

    It also supports multiple frontends and backends, so you can make an ultimate setup with 10 tuner cards and 20 TVs all connected to the same video storage if you're so inclined.
    • Re:MythTV is great (Score:4, Insightful)

      by ilsie (227381) on Monday April 21 2003, @07:13PM (#5777276)
      Series 2 40 hour refurbed TiVo- $150 AR
      120GB Maxtor Fluid Dynamic Bearings 5400RPM HD - $130 (Just using the same HD you did for clarity)
      Lifetime Service- $250
      Total : $530

      Mine does all kinds of fancy ff/rew/pause, I can easily schedule all recordings, etc., I can have TiVo tell me what to watch (I dont, but I could), I have 30-sec commercial skip, and I have a really nice remote that is extremely well designed and always works.

      To be honest, I could really care less about MP3s and emulators and such, I already have a PC and a Mac that can stream MP3s, an Xbox (and a PC and a Mac) that will play emulators/games (and can also stream MP3, vorbis, divx, etc etc etc etc)
      • Re:MythTV is great (Score:5, Informative)

        by foom (29095) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:24PM (#5776958) Homepage
        Compare my box to the price of a TiVo. From Amazon.com: TiVo Series2 80 Hour Digital Video Recorder - $399 - $50 rebate = $350. (I couldn't find the price of a 120 hour TiVo, so I'll give TiVo a little advantage)

        Okay, now add the lifetime service fee of $299. Now you're up to $650. Wow look, all of a suddenmy box is cheaper! Or maybe you just want to add two years of service. Well then $12.95/month * 24 months of service fee - oops that's more than the lifetime fee!

        But guess what: my box can also play video games, and MP3s. I can get TV shows OFF of it onto other media. It can be a webserver, file server, whatever else I want it to be. It stores my MP3s and can play them. Guess which one's a better deal?
        • Re:MythTV is great (Score:5, Informative)

          by foom (29095) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:36PM (#5777056) Homepage
          And oops, I forgot to include the Home Media Option which lets you have the webserver capability, that's an additional $99. So the real TiVo is up to $749. Yet, that comes for free with a custom built one.

          So the TiVo costs more than $100 more than my box, yet my custom built box does more and won't stop working when TiVo goes out of business.
  • MythTV (Score:5, Informative)

    by pz (113803) on Monday April 21 2003, @05:59PM (#5776754) Journal
    The MythTV Project [mythtv.org] is what you want. As often noted on Slashdot, it does nearly everything that TiVo does, and a heapload more. It's open source, and under active development ... however, it's not quite at full functionality. The most recent stable release is version 0.8 and while not without some bugs seems to work quite nicely. I've paired it with a AVerTV Studio TV capture card, a Shuttle FV25 mainboard, and a Celeron 1.4 GHz processor. To my understanding, MythTV supports external tuner devices such as satellite systems. Installation/construction is straightforward but not for the faint of heart. Some RPMs exist for certain required components, but much of installation involves the "./configure; make; su; make install" cycle.

    IF -- and this is a strong supposition -- you either have spare hardware laying around that's pretty strong (eg, in the GHz range rather than 100s of MHz) or have a weird bent on building your own systems, then by all means roll up your sleeves and dig in! However, if you are looking for the least expensive or easiest alternative, then buy a used or refurbished TiVo.
  • Cable. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by labratuk (204918) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:00PM (#5776760)
    While the temptation to make a PVR is really great at the moment, what with mythTV and friends getting better and better, it really isn't practical at the moment. At least here in the UK, for me, it isn't.

    Why?

    All but 4 (well, 4.5 counting ch5) channels are sent through cable for me. Admittedly, those channels do have the better programming on, but it would be somewhat lame not being able to record cable channels.

    For instance, I have digital cable (ntl). All the decoding is done in the cable box and shoved through to channel 7 on the tv. This means you can only record from one pre determined cable channel. Unless you somehow set up lirc to send a 'channel change' ir command to the cable box every time it wants to change cable channel. I've thought about this, but it would be tricky and probably unreliable.

    The question really is: can I justify building a PVR for just 4 channels?
  • My Answer For You (Score:5, Informative)

    by dbretton (242493) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:00PM (#5776766) Homepage
    My question for [you] is[,] "What's worked best for you?"

    Tivo

  • How about Alienware? (Score:3, Informative)

    by valkraider (611225) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:06PM (#5776826) Journal
    Alienware [alienware.com] seems to have a good model [alienware.com], looks nice too. Apple [apple.com] needs to bring back the Cube [cube-zone.com] for this very purpose...
  • by markv242 (622209) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:11PM (#5776869)
    "I'm too cheap to purchase an awesome product from a company that needs consumers, so how can I build my own [insert product here]?"

    This is -1 Redundant, but just buy a Tivo. The Tivo service alone is worth the subscription fee, and Tivo v2 users who have a Mac will absolutely love the new Media Pack, allowing for Rendezvous discovery of iTunes / iPhoto libraries.

    • by SuperBanana (662181) on Monday April 21 2003, @09:06PM (#5777982)
      Next up: "How can I build my own car?"

      While off-topic, I feel the need to point out something about this comment- it's aburdly ignorant. Believe it or not, a LOT of people feel that no car company makes what THEY want, or they want the experience of going through the design process at any of a number of levels, from "simple" modifications to an existing shell, to really wild stuff or completely custom, hand-formed cars. You see this in particular with motorcycles, because they're easier to make from scratch, and of course, motorcycle enthusiasts are famous for wanting something -unique-; plenty of motorcycle guys would cut their throats before stepping into a Honda Civic(or a Honda bike, for that matter.)

      There are lots of kit cars available, including my personal favorite, the Caterham R500. It's based off the famous Lotus Super Seven, weighs half a ton, and has 250 HP(hence a 500hp/ton ratio, and hence the name). It -is- a race car(again, it's basically a Lotus Super Seven), you can get it for $40k, and embarass silly almost every production roadcar made on the planet; it hits 60mph in a little over 3 seconds(it is limited top-speed-wise though, it has the high-speed aerodynamics of a brick), and being so light, it'll easily out-corner -every- production car available today; motorcycles are probably the only thing capable of beating it. The fact that you BUILT your car, versus the "poser" in the 911 twin turbo who "just" bought his car, is icing on the I-just-spanked-your-3x-as-expensive-little-toy cake.

      In the slightly-less-extreme category, there are those of us who buy old cars and keep them running. I own a 10+ year old Audi that with a few hundred dollars in modifications has 280hp, all wheel drive, 5-speed(these are getting rarer and rarer-dammit, I don't WANT an automatic!) an ENORMOUS amount of interior space and trunk space, gets about 22-24mpg highway, weighs 3600lb(that's VERY light compared to cars its size today- full-size luxury cars nowadays tip the scale at well over 4,000lb- often much more!) It looks like "some old Audi"(nobody will ever steal it.) I get to blow the doors off most everything save the cream of the crop of sports cars. If I ever get bored and have the money, 330hp is about $2-3k around the corner. Almost everything on the car is easy to understand, and occasionally specialized tools are required, but I can repair almost anything myself with enough determination; I also have plenty of parts sources so I can get almost anything quickly and far below what a mechanic/dealer would charge me.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 21 2003, @06:15PM (#5776904)
    Seriously. It works.

    I tried to roll my own. I bought an ATI 8500DV specifically because they touted their awesome TV-on-Demand capabilities. Seemed perfect.

    8500DV: $235

    Until I tried to use the damn thing. Oh. It doesn't work well with my motherboard. I was planning to upgrade anyway.

    Refurb motherboard: $50
    XP1800+: $95
    ATX Case: $40
    DDR RAM: $100

    Okay. We're up and running. TV-on-Demand works great. Scheduling recordings isn't that good, tho. The software's pretty bad. Can't do anything automatically. Can't clear out old searches. No conflict resolution. Only a week's worth of data. And it sure wasn't cheaper than a Tivo when I figure in the cost of the new PC. But I can handle setting up scheduled recordings once a week. And the live TV stuff is great.

    Oh. The live TV stuff stops working if the machine's been running for a few hours. Maybe I should upgrade to the latest drivers and software. Great. Now it doesn't work with one of my games. Try a different version. Now TV-on-Demand is worse. Try a different version. Hey! Finally have a setting that spits out SVCD format. Too bad TV-on-Demand is totally broken now.

    And so began the downward spiral. After a few weeks, I just bought a damn Tivo. $200 for the unit, $80 for a network adapter (series 1), $250 for lifetime service. About what I spent on the computer solution with one major difference. IT WORKS. I can leave it alone for days, weeks, months at a time.
  • Outside US (Score:3, Informative)

    by IanBevan (213109) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:24PM (#5776963) Homepage
    Your comment is fine for people in the US. However here in New Zealand the options are considerably more limited as I expect they are in the vast majority of countries, large and small alike.
  • by handsomepete (561396) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:25PM (#5776973) Journal
    I have both a Tivo and a homebrew, and unless you have real serious moral obligations to purchasing something from a company instead of building your own, consider getting a Tivo.

    Homebrew: All parts (sff case, mb, memory, cpu, tv card, large hdd, etc. using MythTV) = ~$650
    +: Yours to do with whatever you please, using actively maintained popular open free software, easily hardware upgradable, fun to play around with, much more software functionality (MythMusic, emulator front end, weather modules, etc.)
    -: Hardware failure is your problem, TV software not quite up to par, more expensive, not quite as slick looking (without looking real hard for a decent case), maintainers can stop working whenever they get the urge, good luck getting digital/satellite TV working well with a cheapo TV card

    Tivo + Lifetime subscription = ~$600 (add a larger hdd for more money)
    +: Company paying people to maintain software and accurate listings, nice to look at, full featured and completely functional, hacker friendly, warranty makes getting a replacement unit easier, software head and shoulders above competition (IMHO YMMV blah blah - I'm sure other posts outline such functionality), it's a device that doesn't care if the power gets yanked on it, is built to support all sorts of television (digital cable, satellite, coax, whatever)
    -: Warranty voided if you open it up, no control over software or updates, company controls any and all software, if Tivo goes out of business listings and software are at their mercy (although there's rumors of a Plan B if that should happen), only does the TV thing (unless you feel like paying for the lackluster Home Media option).

    Simply put:
    Like tinkering? Have a lot of time and money to burn? Roll your own. Otherwise, there's an excellent effortless pvr already available for the same cost. Worst case scenario, buy a Tivo and keep the receipt (choose monthly sub instead of lifetime). Give it a test run. Don't like it? Return it and make a better one.

    The real question is: Has anyone started trying to hack together drivers for the Tivo hardware so you can use their box but your own software?
    • Tivo-like (Score:3, Insightful)

      He wants a computer based PVR, not TIVO. Happily, TIVO has not copyrighted the concept (yet).

      Sounds like you want something small, silent and with one of those nice Hauppage cards - and a really big HDD!

    • Re:Noise (Score:3, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward
      Turn the TV off, the noise goes way down.
    • Re:Noise (Score:4, Informative)

      by agilliland (657359) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:03PM (#5776794)
      seems like one good way to cut the noise and design a scalable system is to provide independent frontend and backend systems. I know mythtv does this. This way you can run a "server" that can do all your recordings and store all your media and be as loud as it wants since it will be anywhere in your house on a network. Then you can attach any number of frontend clients to tvs or monitors ... and those can be hacked down mini boxes of all sorts. To keep the noise down you wouldn't use HDD's or many fans, you would just netboot or boot from cd or floppy. There are also some using XBox as a frontend as well. Pretty nifty if you ask me.
    • Re:Noise (Score:3, Informative)

      Check out this site [silentpcreview.com] for information about quieting your system.
    • by Nugget (7382) <nugget@distributed.net> on Monday April 21 2003, @05:57PM (#5776743) Homepage
      What happened?

      VCRs are being replaced by better technology that does more, better, and provide a much more useful experience. VCRs perform only a small portion of what a PVR does that it's really unfair to compare them.

      The real win of a PVR is being completely insulated from scheduling and the learning capabilities which are able to record programs which you'll enjoy but aren't aware of yet.
        • by ryanr (30917) <ryan@thievco.com> on Monday April 21 2003, @06:37PM (#5777063) Homepage Journal
          I tried this route.

          I had trouble with getting my VCR to play one show while recording another. I also had some difficulty getting it to stream video from my home network. I couldn't figure out how to set the IP address on the VCR. It doesn't seem to use DHCP either. I think the IP is hardcoded to 1.2.0.0 or something, but setting my gateway to 1.2.0.1 didn't help, it won't ARP for it.

          The commercial skip feature works, but it's pretty slow. Resetting the file to the beginning also takes forever for some reason. The REW button works eventually, but I can't find the slider. At first I thought it was hung, but I just let it sit for 5 minutes, and it finally switched from the REW state to the STOP state.

          There's some sort of bug, the media cartridges keep auto-ejecting if I try to record more than 3 hours. There's a low quality mode (mpeg1?) which works for 6 hours, but the quality is just about unusable. This problem is interfering with the monthly show scheduling.

          I also can't seem to get it to load any games, browse the web, or play DVDs. I'm not sure how to even load code onto it. Does anyone have an VHS API reference?
    • by oneiros27 (46144) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:32PM (#5777023) Homepage
      Personally, I still have a VCR.... three of 'em, in fact, and I use them quite often for making copies of things for other people.

      However, I get much better quality making the original dub using a digital recording (well, I've had a few times where it's gone odd, but typically it's a much higher quality, and I don't end up introducing macrovision in there 'till the final run to tape). It's easier to edit out the commercials once, if I'm going to be making multiple copies to tape, or even just changing the playback order.

      Oh..and let's not forget storage... I'm recording at about 1G/hr... so with 2x120G drives in my system, I don't have to worry about changing tapes every few hours. [and actually, every show, as when I used to send everything straight to VHS, I tried to keep shows in order on each tape, so some nights, I'd be switching tapes every hour or 30 minutes, and having to get the next one queued up and wait for my VCR to to its recording calibration test in just a minute or so.

      Now, I can collect up a few shows, and when I want to dump to tape, I just prep a job to run overnight, or do it right before I leave for work....

      hmmm...that reminds me...I was supposed to dub a new copy of Invader Zim for a friend who wore our her tape. (she has a TiVo, but well, she doesn't have enough space on it to keep all of her Zim)
    • by NanoGator (522640) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:35PM (#5777051) Homepage Journal
      "What happened to the days of using a VCR? Yes its not cool or geeky or even the best quality but it certainly suffices for tape delaying a show. Plus a good VCR costs like $60 nowadays with tapes to be had for under a buck. Cheap and a tried a true technology(plus no monthly fee!)."

      Hi! New here? Just transferred from the "Doesn't Get It" department?
    • by rusty0101 (565565) on Monday April 21 2003, @06:46PM (#5777122) Homepage Journal
      I understand that there are these manufacturing byproducts of processing trees, called books. They seem to come in varying costs from a couple of dollars, through hundreds, or even thousands of dollars in rare incidents. I understand that the modern distributers like to get between $5 and $25 for a new one, and they don't ask you to pay that much again, should you decide to re-read the book.

      Surely they are good enough for you, and you shouldn't be pushing these newfangled VCR's on people.

      -Rusty
    • by rusty0101 (565565) on Monday April 21 2003, @07:15PM (#5777284) Homepage Journal
      TiVo does not do this. RePlay 4000 supposedly did this, though since neither I, nor anyone I know has a 4000, I don't know how well that works.

      As I understand it, most of the programs out there use blank monitoring. Before and after a section of the program, there will be blank space of two or three frames that programs that try to remove commercials key on.

      The problem is that unless one of these frames happens to concide with a keyframe in the mpeg stream, they are extreamly hard to find in that stream. As a result it is sometimes disasterously ineffective. It may very nicely catch the begining of the commercial block, but miss the end, and start the stream at the begining of the next commercial block.

      I seem to recall a few years ago that in Japan, they had a work around on some VCRs that would monitor the audio stream. Since most commercials (at the time) were recorded in mono, and programs were in stereo, the VCRs would automatically pause when the audio stream went to mono, and resume when it went back to stereo.

      The only thing that I am aware of that would make sense to try similar to that would be to monitor close captioning, as most locally produced commercials that I have seen do not have captions. It also seems to be hit or miss for nationally produced commercials.

      Good luck.

      -Rusty